SEC Filing - Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

View:

glpi-20231231

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


☒			ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023


☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-36124

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Pennsylvania						46-2116489
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)						(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

845 Berkshire Blvd., Suite 200

Wyomissing, PA 19610

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 610 401-2900

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

GLPI

NASDAQ

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer

☒

Accelerated filer

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2023 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $12.2 billion. Such aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 30, 2023.

Table of Contents

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of February 14, 2024 was 271,500,090.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting of shareholders (when it is filed) will be incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
PART I
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	28
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	39
ITEM 1C.	CYBERSECURITY	39
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	41
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	41
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	41
PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	42
ITEM 6.	RESERVED	42
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	42
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	63
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	65
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	112
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	112
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	114
ITEM 9C.	DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS	114
PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	115
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	115
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS	115
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	115
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	115
PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE	116
ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY	116
	EXHIBIT INDEX	117
	SIGNATURES	123

Table of Contents

IMPORTANT FACTORS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Forward-looking statements in this document are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. ("GLPI") and its subsidiaries (collectively with GLPI, the "Company") to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning the Company's business strategy, plans, goals and objectives.

Forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our ability to grow our portfolio of gaming facilities. In addition, statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "projects," "estimates," "plans," "may increase," "may fluctuate," and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would," "may" and "could" are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. You should understand that the following important factors could affect future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:

•the impact that higher inflation rates and uncertainty with respect to the future state of the economy could have on discretionary consumer spending, including the casino operations of our tenants;

•unforeseen consequences related to United States ("U.S.") government monetary policies and stimulus packages on inflation rates and economic growth;

•the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease the respective properties on favorable terms;

•the degree and nature of our competition;

•the ability to receive, or delays in obtaining, the regulatory approvals required to own and/or operate our properties, or other delays or impediments to completing our planned acquisitions or projects;

•the impact of elevated interest rates and higher levels of inflation (which have been exacerbated by the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine and may be further impacted by recent events in the Middle East);

•the potential of a new pandemic, including its effect on the ability or desire of people to gather in large groups (including in casinos), which could impact our financial results, operations, outlooks, plans, goals, growth, cash flows, liquidity, and stock price;

•our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), given the highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist, where even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize REIT qualification and where requirements may depend in part on the actions of third parties over which the Company has no control or only limited influence;

•the satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis in order for the Company to maintain its REIT status;

•the ability and willingness of our tenants and other third parties to meet and/or perform their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with us, including lease and note requirements and in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;

•the ability of our tenants and operators to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including, without limitation, to satisfy obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness;

•the ability of our tenants to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to deliver high quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract customers;

•the ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness;

Table of Contents

•our ability to access capital through debt and equity markets in amounts and at rates and costs acceptable to GLPI, including for acquisitions or refinancings due to maturities;

•adverse changes in our credit rating;

•the availability of qualified personnel and our ability to retain our key management personnel;

•changes in the U.S. tax law and other federal, state or local laws, whether or not specific to real estate, REITs or the gaming, lodging or hospitality industries;

•changes in accounting standards;

•the impact of weather or climate events or conditions, natural disasters, acts of terrorism and other international hostilities, war (including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and recent conflicts in the Middle East) or political instability;

•the risk that the historical financial statements included herein do not reflect what the business, financial position or results of operations of GLPI may be in the future;

•other risks inherent in the real estate business, including potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments; and

•additional factors discussed in the sections entitled "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report.

Other unknown or unpredictable factors may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to anticipate and are generally beyond the control of the Company.

You should consider the areas of risk described above, as well as those set forth under the heading "Risk Factors," in connection with considering any forward-looking statements that may be made by the Company generally. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless required to do so by law.

Table of Contents

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms "we," "us," "our," the "Company" and "GLPI" refer to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

GLPI is a self-administered and self-managed Pennsylvania REIT. The Company was formed from the 2013 tax-free spin-off of the real estate assets of PENN Entertainment, Inc., formerly known as Penn National Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN) ("PENN") and was incorporated in Pennsylvania on February 13, 2013, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PENN. On November 1, 2013, PENN contributed to GLPI, through a series of internal corporate restructurings, substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with PENN's real property interests and real estate development business, as well as the assets and liabilities of Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and Hollywood Casino Perryville (which are referred to as the "TRS Properties") and then spun-off GLPI to holders of PENN's common and preferred stock in a tax-free distribution (the "Spin-Off"). The assets and liabilities of GLPI were recorded at their respective historical carrying values at the time of the Spin-Off in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 505-60 - Spinoffs and Reverse Spinoffs ("ASC 505").

The Company elected on its U.S. federal income tax return for its taxable year that began on January 1, 2014 to be treated as a REIT and GLPI, together with its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, GLP Holdings, Inc., jointly elected to treat each of GLP Holdings, Inc., Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge) and Penn Cecil Maryland, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Perryville) as a "taxable REIT subsidiary" ("TRS") effective on the first day of the first taxable year of GLPI as a REIT. In connection with the Spin-Off, PENN allocated its accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) for periods prior to the consummation of the Spin-Off between PENN and GLPI. In connection with its election to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, GLPI declared a special dividend to its shareholders to distribute any accumulated earnings and profits relating to the real property assets and attributable to any pre-REIT years, including any earnings and profits allocated to GLPI in connection with the Spin-Off, to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements.

On July 1, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville to PENN and leased the real estate to PENN pursuant to a standalone lease. On December 17, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge to The Queen Casino & Entertainment Inc., formerly known as CQ Holding Company, Inc., ("Casino Queen") and leased the real estate to Casino Queen pursuant to the Casino Queen Master Lease as described below. On December 17, 2021, GLPI declared a special dividend to the Company's shareholders to distribute the accumulated earnings and profits attributable to these sales. In 2021, subsequent to the sale of the operations of the TRS Properties, GLP Holdings, Inc. was merged into GLP Capital, L.P., the operating partnership ("GLP Capital").

During 2020, the Company and Tropicana LV, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that at the time held the real estate of the Tropicana Las Vegas Casino Hotel Resort ("Tropicana Las Vegas"), elected to treat Tropicana LV, LLC as a TRS. In September 2022, Bally's Corporation ("Bally's") acquired both the building assets from GLPI and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas. GLPI retained ownership of the land and entered into a ground lease with Bally's. In connection with this transaction, Tropicana LV, LLC was merged into GLP Capital. GLPI paid a special earnings and profit dividend of $0.25 per share in the first quarter of 2023 related to the sale of the building to Bally's.

As partial consideration for the transactions with The Cordish Companies ("Cordish") described below, GLP Capital issued 7,366,683 newly-issued operating partnership units ("OP Units") to affiliates of Cordish. OP Units are exchangeable for common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain terms and conditions. Such issuance of OP Units to Cordish in exchange for its contribution of certain real property assets resulted in GLP Capital becoming treated as a partnership for income tax purposes, with GLPI being deemed to contribute substantially all of the assets and liabilities of GLP Capital in exchange for the general partnership and a majority of the limited partnership interests, and a minority limited partnership interest being owned by Cordish (the "UPREIT Transaction"). In advance of the UPREIT Transaction, the Company, together with GLP Financing II, Inc., jointly elected for GLP Financing II, Inc. to be treated as a TRS effective December 23, 2021. On January 3, 2023, the Company issued 286,643 OP Units to affiliates of Bally's in connection with its acquisition of Bally's Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Biloxi ("Bally's Biloxi") and Bally's Tiverton Casino & Hotel ("Bally's Tiverton"). There were 7,653,326 OP Units outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

Table of Contents

GLPI's primary business consists of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements. Triple-net leases are leases in which the lessee pays rent to the lessor, as well as all taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance expenses that arise from the use of the property. As of December 31, 2023, GLPI's portfolio consisted of interests in 61 gaming and related facilities, the real property associated with 34 gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with 6 gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: CZR) ("Caesars"), the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Boyd Gaming Corporation (NYSE: BYD) ("Boyd"), the real property associated with 9 gaming and related facilities operated by Bally's Corporation (NYSE: BALY) ("Bally's"), the real property associated with 3 gaming and related facilities operated by Cordish, the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Casino Queen and 1 gaming facility under construction that upon opening is intended to be managed by a subsidiary of Hard Rock International ("Hard Rock"). These facilities, including our corporate headquarters building, are geographically diversified across 18 states and contain approximately 28.7 million square feet. As of December 31, 2023, our properties were 100% occupied. We expect to continue growing our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional gaming facilities to lease to gaming operators under prudent terms.

Leases

PENN 2023 Master Lease and Amended PENN Master Lease

As a result of the Spin-Off, GLPI owns substantially all of PENN’s former real property assets (as of the consummation of the Spin-Off) and leases back most of those assets to PENN for use by its subsidiaries pursuant to a unitary master lease (the initial form of such lease, the "Original PENN Master Lease"). The Original PENN Master Lease was a triple-net lease, the term of which was scheduled to expire on October 31, 2033, with no purchase option, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

On October 10, 2022, the Company announced that it agreed to create a new master lease with PENN for seven of PENN's properties (the "PENN 2023 Master Lease"). The companies also agreed to a funding mechanism to support PENN's pursuit of relocation and development opportunities at several of the properties included in the new master lease.

Pursuant to this agreement, the Original PENN Master Lease was amended (the "Amended PENN Master Lease") to remove PENN's properties in Aurora and Joliet, Illinois; Columbus and Toledo, Ohio; and Henderson, Nevada. The properties removed from the Original PENN Master Lease were added to a new master lease. In addition, the existing leases for the Hollywood Casino at The Meadows in Pennsylvania (the "Meadows Lease") and the Hollywood Casino Perryville in Maryland (the "Perryville Lease") were terminated and these properties were transferred into the new master lease (the "PENN 2023 Master Lease"). Both the Amended PENN Master Lease and the PENN 2023 Master Lease are triple-net operating leases that became effective on January 1, 2023, the terms of which expire on October 31, 2033, with no purchase options, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

GLPI agreed to fund up to $225 million for the relocation of PENN's riverboat casino in Aurora at a 7.75% cap rate and, if requested by PENN, will fund up to $350 million for the relocation of the Hollywood Casino Joliet, the construction of a hotel at Hollywood Casino Columbus, and the construction of a second hotel tower at the M Resort Spa Casino at then current market rates.

The terms of the PENN 2023 Master Lease and the Amended PENN Master Lease are substantially similar to the Original PENN Master Lease with the following key differences:

•The PENN 2023 Master Lease is cross-defaulted and co-terminus with the Amended PENN Master Lease.

•The rent for the PENN 2023 Master Lease is $232.2 million in base rent with fixed annual escalation of 1.50%, with the first escalation occurring on November 1, 2023.

•The rent for the Amended PENN Master Lease is $284.1 million, consisting of $208.2 million of building base rent, $43.0 million of land base rent, and $32.9 million of percentage rent.

Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, Boyd Master Lease and Belterra Park Lease

Table of Contents

(exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions (the "Pinnacle Master Lease"). On October 15, 2018, the Company completed its previously announced transactions with PENN, Pinnacle and Boyd to accommodate PENN's acquisition of the majority of Pinnacle's operations, pursuant to a definitive agreement and plan of merger between PENN and Pinnacle, dated December 17, 2017 (the "PENN-Pinnacle Merger"). Concurrent with the PENN-Pinnacle Merger, the Company amended the Pinnacle Master Lease to allow for the sale of the operating assets of Ameristar Casino Hotel Kansas City, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles and Belterra Casino Resort from Pinnacle to Boyd (the "Amended Pinnacle Master Lease") and entered into a new unitary triple-net master lease agreement with Boyd (the "Boyd Master Lease") for these properties on terms similar to the Company’s Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Boyd Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years (from the original April 2016 commencement date of the Pinnacle Master Lease and expiring April 30, 2026), with no purchase option, followed by five 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. The Company also purchased the real estate assets of Plainridge Park Casino ("Plainridge Park") from PENN for $250.0 million, exclusive of transaction fees and taxes, and added this property to the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Amended Pinnacle Master Lease was assumed by PENN at the consummation of the PENN-Pinnacle Merger. The Company also entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Boyd in connection with Boyd's acquisition of Belterra Park Gaming & Entertainment Center ("Belterra Park"), whereby the Company loaned Boyd $57.7 million (the "Belterra Park Loan"). In May 2020, the Company acquired the real estate assets of Belterra Park in satisfaction of the Belterra Park Loan, subject to a long-term lease (the "Belterra Park Lease") with a Boyd affiliate operating the property. The Belterra Park Lease rent terms are consistent with the Boyd Master Lease. The annual rent is comprised of a fixed component, part of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities which is adjusted, subject to certain floors, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of Belterra Park during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease

On October 1, 2018, the Company closed its previously announced transaction to acquire certain real property assets from Tropicana Entertainment Inc. ("Tropicana") and certain of its affiliates pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 15, 2018 between Tropicana and GLP Capital, which was subsequently amended on October 1, 2018 (as amended, the "Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired the real estate assets of Tropicana Atlantic City, Tropicana Evansville, Tropicana Laughlin, Trop Casino Greenville and the Belle of Baton Rouge (the "GLP Assets") from Tropicana for an aggregate cash purchase price of $964.0 million, exclusive of transaction fees and taxes (the "Tropicana Acquisition"). Concurrent with the Tropicana Acquisition, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (now doing business as Caesars) acquired the operating assets of these properties from Tropicana pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 15, 2018 by and among Tropicana, GLP Capital, Caesars and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caesars and leased the GLP Assets from the Company pursuant to the terms of a new unitary triple-net master lease with an initial term of 15 years, with no purchase option, followed by four successive 5-year renewal periods (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions (the "Caesars Master Lease").

On June 15, 2020, the Company amended and restated the Caesars Master Lease (as amended, the "Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease") to, (i) extend the initial term of 15 years to 20 years, with renewals of up to an additional 20 years at the option of Caesars, (ii) remove the variable rent component in its entirety commencing with the third lease year, (iii) in the third lease year, increase annual land base rent and annual building base rent, (iv) provide fixed escalation percentages that delay the escalation of building base rent until the commencement of the fifth lease year with building base rent increasing annually by 1.25% in the fifth and sixth lease years, 1.75% in the seventh and eighth lease years and 2% in the ninth lease year and each lease year thereafter, (v) subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, permit Caesars to elect to replace the Tropicana Evansville and/or Trop Casino Greenville properties under the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease with one or more of Caesars Gaming Scioto Downs, The Row in Reno, Isle Casino Racing Pompano Park, Isle Casino Hotel – Black Hawk, Lady Luck Casino – Black Hawk, Isle Casino Waterloo ("Waterloo"), Isle Casino Bettendorf ("Bettendorf") or Isle of Capri Casino Boonville, provided that the aggregate value of such new property, individually or collectively, was at least equal to the value of Tropicana Evansville or Trop Casino Greenville, as applicable, (vi) permit Caesars to elect to sell its interest in Belle of Baton Rouge and sever it from the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease (with no change to the rent obligation to the Company), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, and (vii) provide certain relief under the operating, capital expenditure and financial covenants thereunder in the event of facility closures due to pandemics, governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. The effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease was subject to the review and approval of certain gaming regulatory agencies and the expiration of applicable gaming regulatory advance notice periods which conditions were satisfied on July 23, 2020.

Table of Contents

of an Exchange Agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") with subsidiaries of Caesars in which Caesars transferred to the Company the real estate assets of Waterloo and Bettendorf in exchange for the transfer by the Company to Caesars of the real property assets of Tropicana Evansville, plus a cash payment of $5.7 million. In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the annual building base rent and the annual land base rent were increased.

On November 13, 2023, the Company and Caesars amended and restated the Second Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease (as amended and restated, the "Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease") in connection with Caesars selling its interest in the Belle of Baton Rouge to Casino Queen with no change in rent obligation to the Company. See Note 12 for further discussion.

Horseshoe St. Louis Lease

On October 1, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Caesars in connection with Caesars’s acquisition of Lumière Place Casino, now known as Horseshoe St. Louis ("Horseshoe St. Louis"), whereby the Company loaned Caesars $246.0 million (the "CZR loan"). The CZR loan bore interest at a rate equal to (i) 9.09% until October 1, 2019 and (ii) 9.27% until its maturity. On the one-year anniversary of the CZR loan, the mortgage evidenced by a deed of trust on the Horseshoe St. Louis property terminated and the loan became unsecured. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from the Missouri Gaming Commission to own the real estate assets of the Horseshoe St. Louis property in satisfaction of the CZR loan. On September 29, 2020, the transaction closed and the Company entered into a new single property triple net lease with Caesars (the "Horseshoe St. Louis Lease") the initial term of which expires on October 31, 2033, with four separate renewal options of five years each, exercisable at the tenant's option. The Horseshoe St. Louis Lease rent terms were adjusted on December 1, 2021 such that the annual escalator is now fixed at 1.25% for the second through fifth lease years, increasing to 1.75% for the sixth and seventh lease years and thereafter increasing by 2.0% for the remainder of the lease.

Bally's Master Lease

On June 3, 2021, the Company completed its previously announced transaction pursuant to which a subsidiary of Bally's acquired 100% of the equity interests in the Caesars subsidiary that currently operates Tropicana Evansville and the Company reacquired the real property assets of Tropicana Evansville from Caesars for a cash purchase price of approximately $340.0 million. In addition, the Company purchased the real estate assets of Dover Downs Hotel & Casino (now Bally's Dover Casino Resort) from Bally's for a cash purchase price of approximately $144.0 million. The real estate assets of these two facilities were added to a new triple net master lease (the "Bally's Master Lease") the annual rent of which is subject to contractual escalations based on the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") with a 1% floor and a 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI meeting a 0.5% threshold. The Bally's Master Lease has an initial term of 15 years, with no purchase option, followed by four 5 year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

On April 1, 2022 and January 3, 2023, the Company completed the acquisitions of the real estate assets of Bally's Black Hawk, Bally's Quad Cities, Bally's Biloxi, and Bally's Tiverton. These properties were added to the existing Bally's Master Lease with annual rent increases that are subject to the escalation clauses described above.

In connection with GLPI’s commitment to consummate the Bally’s Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton acquisitions, the Company also agreed to pre-fund, at Bally’s election, a deposit of up to $200.0 million, which was funded in September 2022 and recorded in Other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2022. This amount was credited to GLPI along with a $9.0 million transaction fee payable at closing which occurred on January 3, 2023. The Company continues to have the option, subject to receipt by Bally's of required consents, to acquire the real property assets of Bally's Twin River Lincoln Casino Resort ("Bally's Lincoln") prior to December 31, 2026 for a purchase price of $771.0 million and additional rent of $58.8 million.

Tropicana Las Vegas Lease

On April 16, 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries closed on its previously announced transaction to acquire the real property associated with the Tropicana Las Vegas from PENN in exchange for $307.5 million of rent credits which were applied against future rent obligations due under the parties' existing leases during 2020.

On September 26, 2022, Bally’s acquired both GLPI’s building assets and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas for an aggregate cash acquisition price, net of fees and expenses, of approximately $145 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $67.4 million, $52.8 million after-tax. GLPI retained ownership of the land and concurrently entered into a ground lease for an initial term of 50 years (with a maximum term of 99 years inclusive of tenant renewal options). All rent is subject to contractual escalations based on the CPI, with a 1% floor and 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI

Table of Contents

meeting a 0.5% threshold. The ground lease is supported by a Bally’s corporate guarantee and cross-defaulted with the Bally's Master Lease (the "Tropicana Las Vegas Lease").

On May 13, 2023 the Company, Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bally’s, and Athletics Holdings LLC (“Athletics”), which owns the Major League Baseball (“MLB”) team currently known as the Oakland Athletics (the “Team”), entered into a binding letter of intent (the “LOI”) setting forth the terms for developing a stadium that would serve as the home venue for the Team (the “Stadium”). The Stadium is expected to complement the potential resort redevelopment envisioned at our 35-acre property in Clark County, Nevada (the “Tropicana Site”), owned indirectly by GLPI through its indirect subsidiary, Tropicana Land LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and leased by GLPI to Bally’s pursuant to the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease. The LOI allows for Athletics to be granted fee ownership by GLPI of approximately 9 acres of the Tropicana Site for construction of the Stadium. The LOI provides that following the Stadium site transfer, there will be no reduction in the rent obligations of Bally’s on the remaining portion of the Tropicana Site or other modifications to the ground lease, and that to the extent GLPI has any consent or approval rights under the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease, such rights shall remain enforceable unless expressly modified in writing in the definitive documents. Bally's and GLPI are agreeing to provide the Stadium site transfer in exchange for the benefits that the Stadium is expected to bring to the Tropicana Site. The LOI provides that Athletics shall pay all the costs associated with the design, development, and construction of the Stadium and Bally’s shall pay all costs for the redevelopment of the casino and hotel resort amenities. GLPI is expected to commit to up to $175.0 million of funding for hard construction costs, such as demolition and site preparation and build out of minimum public spaces needed for utilization of the Stadium. The LOI provides that during the development period, rent will be due at 8.5% of what has been funded, provided that the first $15.0 million advanced for the costs of construction of the food, beverage and retail entrance plaza shall not be subject to increased rent. GLPI may have the opportunity to fund additional amounts of the construction under certain circumstances. In addition, the LOI provides that the transaction will be subject to customary approvals and other conditions, including, without limitation, approval of a master plan for the site and certain approvals by the Nevada Gaming Control Board and Nevada Gaming Commission.

Morgantown Lease

On October 1, 2020, the Company and PENN closed on their previously announced transaction whereby GLPI acquired the land under PENN's gaming facility under construction in Morgantown, Pennsylvania in exchange for $30.0 million in rent credits that were utilized by PENN in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company is leasing the land back to an affiliate of PENN for an initial term of 20 years, followed by six 5-year renewal options exercisable by the tenant. On the opening date of the gaming facility and on each anniversary thereafter rent shall be increased by 1.5% annually (on a prorated basis for the remainder of the lease year in which the gaming facility opens) for each of the following three lease years and commencing on the fourth anniversary of the opening date and for each anniversary thereafter, (i) if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and (ii) if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year (the "Morgantown Lease"). Hollywood Casino Morgantown opened on December 22, 2021.

Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease

On November 25, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the operations of its Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge to Casino Queen for $28.2 million (the "HCBR transaction"). The HCBR transaction closed on December 17, 2021. The Company retained ownership of all real estate assets at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and simultaneously entered into an amended triple net master lease with Casino Queen, which includes the Casino Queen property in East St. Louis that was leased by the Company to Casino Queen and the Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge facility (the "Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease"). The lease has an initial term of 15 years with four 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. The annual rent increases by 0.5% for the first six years. Beginning with the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.25% then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. Additionally, the Company's landside development project at Casino Queen Baton Rouge was completed in late August 2023 and the rent under the Casino Queen Master Lease was adjusted upon opening to reflect a yield of 8.25% on GLPI's project costs of $77 million. Pursuant to an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, the Company acquired the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million as of September 6, 2023 and annual rent was increased by $2.7 million for this acquisition. Additionally, the Company anticipates funding certain construction costs for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million, for a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette. The rent will be adjusted to reflect a yield of 8.25% for the funded project costs. The Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was subsequently amended and restated on November 13, 2023 (the "Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease").

Table of Contents

Maryland Live! Lease and Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease

On December 6, 2021, the Company announced that it agreed to acquire the real property assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland, Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia, and Live! Casino Pittsburgh, including applicable long-term ground leases, from affiliates of Cordish for aggregate consideration of approximately $1.81 billion, excluding transaction costs at deal announcement. The transaction also includes a binding partnership on future Cordish casino developments, as well as potential financing partnerships between the Company and Cordish in other areas of Cordish's portfolio of real estate and operating businesses. On December 29, 2021, the Company completed its acquisition of the real property assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland and entered into a single asset lease for Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland (the "Maryland Live! Lease"). On March 1, 2022, the Company completed its acquisition of the real estate assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia and Live! Casino Pittsburgh for $689 million and leased back the real estate to Cordish pursuant to a new triple net master lease with Cordish (as amended from time to time, the "Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease"). The Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease and the Maryland Live! Lease both have initial lease terms of 39 years, with a maximum term of 60 years inclusive of tenant renewal options. The annual rent for both leases has a 1.75% fixed yearly escalator on the entirety of rent commencing on the leases' second anniversary.

Rockford Lease

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a casino development project in Rockford, IL, that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock, from an affiliate of 815 Entertainment, LLC ("815 Entertainment") for $100.0 million. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into a ground lease with 815 Entertainment for a 99-year term. The initial annual rent for the ground lease is $8.0 million, subject to fixed 2% annual escalation beginning with the lease's first anniversary and for the entirety of its term (the "Rockford Lease").

In addition to the Rockford Lease, the Company has also committed to providing up to $150 million of development funding via a senior secured delayed draw term loan (the "Rockford Loan"). Borrowings under the Rockford Loan will be subject to an interest rate of 10%. The Rockford Loan has a maximum outstanding period of up to 6 years (5-year initial term with a 1-year extension). The Rockford Loan is prepayable without penalty following the opening of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL, which is expected in September 2024. The Rockford Loan advances are subject to typical construction lending terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2023, $40 million was advanced and outstanding under the Rockford Loan. Additionally, the Company also received a right of first refusal on the building improvements of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL if there is a future decision to sell them once completed.

Guarantees

The obligations under the PENN Master Lease, Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, and the Morgantown Lease, are guaranteed by PENN and, with respect to each lease, jointly and severally by PENN's subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities covered by such lease. Similarly, the obligations under the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease, the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease and the Bally's Master Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by the corporate parent and the parent's subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities leased under the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease, the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease and Bally's Master Lease, respectively. The obligations under the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease are guaranteed by Bally's. The obligations under the Boyd Master Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by Boyd's subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities leased under the Boyd Master Lease. Similarly, the obligations under the Maryland Live! Lease and Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by the Cordish subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities leased under the respective leases and the obligations under the Rockford Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by the subsidiaries of 815 Entertainment, LLC that occupy and operate the facility under the Rockford Lease.

Rent

The rent structure under the Amended PENN Master Lease includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities, which is prospectively adjusted, subject to certain floors (namely the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course property due to PENN's opening of a competing facility) (i) every five years to an amount equal to 4% of the average net revenues of all facilities under the Amended PENN Master Lease during the preceding five years in excess of a contractual baseline.

Table of Contents

Similar to the Amended PENN Master Lease, the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease also includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities, which is prospectively adjusted, subject to certain floors (namely the Bossier City Boomtown property due to PENN's acquisition of a competing facility, Margaritaville Resort Casino), every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average net revenues of all facilities under the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

The PENN 2023 Master Lease that became effective on January 1, 2023 has annual rent of $232.2 million, which is fixed and subject to annual escalation of 1.50%, with the first escalation for the lease year beginning on November 1, 2023. In addition to the fixed escalations, a one-time annualized increase of $1.4 million is scheduled to occur on November 1, 2027. The prepaid rent and deferred revenue from the Perryville Lease and Meadows Lease (which were terminated effective January 1, 2023 and whose underlying real estate was added to the PENN 2023 Master Lease) along with an allocation of the deferred revenue from the Original PENN Master Lease, as well as the guaranteed fixed escalations and the one-time annual base rent increase, are being recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term, which expires on October 31, 2033.

The Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease building base rent escalates at 1.25% during the fifth and sixth lease years. In the seventh and eighth lease years it escalates at 1.75% and then escalates at 2% in the ninth lease year and each lease year thereafter.

The Boyd Master Lease includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities, which is adjusted every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of all facilities under the Boyd Master Lease during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

In May 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Belterra Park in satisfaction of the Belterra Park Loan, subject to the Belterra Park Lease with a Boyd affiliate operating the property. The Belterra Park Lease rent terms are consistent with the Boyd Master Lease. The annual rent is comprised of a fixed component, part of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities which is adjusted, subject to certain floors, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of Belterra Park during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

On September 29, 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Horseshoe St. Louis in satisfaction of the CZR loan, subject to the Horseshoe St. Louis Lease, the initial term of which expires on October 31, 2033, with 4 separate renewal options of five years each, exercisable at the tenant's option. The Horseshoe St. Louis Lease's rent is subject to an annual escalator of 1.25% for the second through fifth lease years, increasing to 1.75% for the sixth and seventh lease years and thereafter increasing by 2.0% for the remainder of the lease.

The Morgantown Lease became effective on October 1, 2020 whereby the Company is leasing the land under PENN's gaming facility and the rent for lease year two and three was increased by 1.5% annually (and on a prorated basis for the remainder of the lease year in which the gaming facility opened) and (ii) commencing on the fourth anniversary of the opening date and for each anniversary thereafter, (a) if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and (b) if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. Hollywood Casino Morgantown opened on December 22, 2021.

The rent under the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease increases annually by 0.5% for lease years two through six. Beginning with the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year, then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.25%, then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. The Company also completed a landside development project that opened in late August 2023 and rent under the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was adjusted to reflect a yield of 8.25% on GLPI's project costs of $77 million. Additionally, on September 6, 2023, the Company acquired the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million. The annual rent on the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was increased by $2.7 million for this acquisition. Finally, the Company anticipates funding certain construction costs of a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette in an amount not to exceed $12.5 million.

The Bally's Master Lease became effective on June 3, 2021 with the annual rent subject to contractual escalations based on the CPI, with a 1% floor and a 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI meeting a 0.5% threshold. On April 1, 2022 and January 3, 2023, the Company completed additional acquisitions from Bally's of various real estate assets of Bally's casinos. These properties were added to the existing Bally's Master Lease with annual rent increases subject to the escalation clauses described

Table of Contents

above.

On December 29, 2021, the Maryland Live! Lease with Cordish became effective. Annual rent increases by 1.75% annually commencing upon the second anniversary of the lease commencement. The Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease with Cordish became effective March 1, 2022 and annual rent increases by 1.75% commencing upon the second anniversary of the lease commencement. These leases were accounted for as an Investment in leases, financing receivables. See Note 7 for the further information including the future annual cash payments to be received under these leases.

On September 26, 2022, the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease became effective. Commencing on the first anniversary and on each anniversary thereafter, if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent shall increase by the greater of 1% of the rent in effect for the preceding lease year and the CPI increase, capped at 2%. If the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year.

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a casino development project in Rockford, IL that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock, from an affiliate of 815 Entertainment. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into the Rockford Lease, the rent of which is subject to fixed 2% annual escalations.

Furthermore, the Company's leases with percentage rent provide for a floor on such percentage rent described above, should the Company's tenants acquire or commence operating a competing facility within a restricted area (typically 60 miles from a property under the existing lease with such tenant). These clauses provide landlord protections by basing the percentage rent floor for any affected facility on the net revenues of such facility for the calendar year immediately preceding the year in which the competing facility is acquired or first operated by the tenant. A percentage rent floor on the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease was triggered on the Bossier City Boomtown property due to PENN's acquisition of Margaritaville Resort Casino. Additionally, a percentage rent floor on the Amended Penn Master Lease was triggered on the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course in connection with PENN opening a facility in York, Pennsylvania, which went into effect on November 1, 2023, the date of the latest reset.

Costs

In addition to rent, as triple-net lessees, all of the Company's tenants are required to pay the following executory costs: (1) all facility maintenance, (2) all insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, including coverage of the landlord's interests, (3) taxes and other impositions levied on or with respect to the leased properties (other than taxes on the income of the lessor), and (4) all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties.

Termination of Leases

Our tenants do not have the ability to terminate their obligations under our long-term tenant leases prior to the expiration of the initial term without the Company's consent. If our long-term tenant leases are terminated prior to their initial expiration other than with our consent, our tenants may be liable for damages and incur charges such as continued payment of rent through the end of the lease term and maintenance costs for the leased property. All of our tenant leases contain a limited number of renewal options which may be exercised at our tenants' option.

/10

Table of Contents

Property Features

The following table summarizes certain features of our properties as of December 31, 2023:


	Location	Tenant/Lease Agreement	Approx. Property Square Footage (1)	Owned Acreage	Leased Acreage (2)	Hotel Rooms
Tenant Occupied Properties
Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg (3)	Lawrenceburg, IN	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	634,000	73.1	32.1	295
Argosy Casino Alton	Alton, IL	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	124,569	0.2	3.6	—
Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races	Charles Town, WV	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	511,249	298.6	—	153
Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course	Grantville, PA	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	451,758	573.7	—	—
Hollywood Casino Bangor	Bangor, ME	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	257,085	6.4	37.9	152
Zia Park Casino (3)	Hobbs, NM	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	109,067	317.4	—	—
Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast	Bay St. Louis, MS	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	425,920	578.7	—	291
Argosy Casino Riverside	Riverside, MO	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	450,397	37.9	—	258
Hollywood Casino Tunica	Tunica, MS	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	315,831	—	67.7	494
Boomtown Biloxi	Biloxi, MS	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	134,800	1.5	1.0	—
Hollywood Casino St. Louis	Maryland Heights, MO	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	645,270	220.8	—	502
Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway	Dayton, OH	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	191,037	119.7	—	—
Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course	Youngstown, OH	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	177,448	193.4	—	—
1st Jackpot Casino	Tunica, MS	PENN/Amended PENN Master Lease	78,941	52.9	93.8	—
Hollywood Casino Toledo	Toledo, OH	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	285,335	42.3	—	—
Hollywood Casino Columbus	Columbus, OH	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	354,075	116.2	—	—
The Meadows Racetrack and Casino (3)	Washington, PA	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	417,921	155.5	—	—
Hollywood Casino Perryville	Perryville, MD	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	97,961	36.3	—	—
Hollywood Casino Aurora	Aurora, IL	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	222,189	0.4	1.7	—
Hollywood Casino Joliet	Joliet, IL	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	322,446	275.6	—	100
M Resort	Henderson, NV	PENN/PENN Master Lease - New	910,173	83.5	—	390
Ameristar Black Hawk	Black Hawk, CO	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	775,744	105.2	—	536
Ameristar East Chicago	East Chicago, IN	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	509,867	—	21.6	288
Ameristar Council Bluffs (3)	Council Bluffs, IA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	312,047	36.2	22.6	160
L'Auberge Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	436,461	99.1	—	205
Boomtown Bossier City	Bossier City, LA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	281,747	21.8	—	187
L'Auberge Lake Charles	Lake Charles, LA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	1,014,497	—	234.5	995
Boomtown New Orleans	New Orleans, LA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	278,227	53.6	—	150
Ameristar Vicksburg	Vicksburg, MS	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	298,006	74.1	—	148
River City Casino and Hotel	St. Louis, MO	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	431,226	—	83.4	200
Jackpot Properties (4)	Jackpot, NV	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	419,800	79.5	—	416
Plainridge Park Casino	Plainville, MA	PENN/Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	196,473	87.9	—	—
Hollywood Casino Morgantown	Morgantown, PA	PENN/Morgantown Lease	—	36.0	—	—
Draft Kings at Casino Queen	East St. Louis, IL	Casino Queen/Amended Casino Queen Master Lease	330,502	67.2	—	157
The Queen Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	Casino Queen/Amended Casino Queen Master Lease	103,990	25.1	—	—
Casino Queen Marquette	Marquette, IA	Casino Queen/Amended Casino Queen Master Lease	22,000	10.4	—	—
Belle of Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	Casino Queen/Amended Casino Queen Master Lease	442,070	13.9	—	288
Belterra Casino Resort	Florence, IN	Boyd/Boyd Master Lease	782,393	167.1	148.5	662
Ameristar Kansas City	Kansas City, MO	Boyd/Boyd Master Lease	763,939	224.5	31.4	184
Ameristar St. Charles	St. Charles, MO	Boyd/Boyd Master Lease	1,272,938	241.2	—	397
Belterra Park Gaming & Entertainment Center	Cincinnati, OH	Boyd/Belterra Park Lease	372,650	160.0	—	—
Tropicana Atlantic City	Atlantic City, NJ	Caesars/Amended Caesars Master Lease	4,232,018	18.3	—	2,364
Tropicana Laughlin	Laughlin, NV	Caesars/Amended Caesars Master Lease	936,453	93.6	—	1,487

/11

Table of Contents


Isle Casino Hotel Bettendorf	Bettendorf, IA	Caesars/Amended Caesars Master Lease	738,905	24.6	—	509
Isle Casino Hotel Waterloo	Waterloo, IA	Caesars/Amended Caesars Master Lease	287,436	52.6	—	194
Trop Casino Greenville	Greenville, MS	Caesars/Amended Caesars Master Lease	94,017	—	7.4	—
Horseshoe St. Louis	St. Louis, MO	Caesars/Horseshoe St. Louis Lease	807,407	18.5	—	494
Bally's Dover Casino Resort	Dover, DE	Bally's Master Lease	212,500	69.6	—	500
Tropicana Evansville	Evansville, IN	Bally's Master Lease	754,833	18.4	10.2	338
Bally's Black Hawk (5)	Black Hawk, CO	Bally's Master Lease	118,552	3.2	—	—
Bally's Quad Cities Casino & Hotel	Rock Island, IL	Bally's Master Lease	390,285	119.9	—	205
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Biloxi	Biloxi, MS	Bally's Master Lease	736,180	8.6	—	479
Bally's Tiverton Hotel & Casino	Tiverton, RI	Bally's Master Lease	139,773	46.6	—	84
Tropicana Las Vegas	Las Vegas, NV	Bally's/ Tropicana Las Vegas Lease	—	35.1	—	—
Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland (6)	Hanover, MD	Cordish / Maryland Live! Lease	2,280,591	—	36.4	310
Live! Casino Pittsburgh (6)	Greensburg, PA	Cordish/Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease	129,552	—	1.8	—
Live! Casino and Hotel Philadelphia (6)	Philadelphia, PA	Cordish/Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease	685,000	9.6	—	208
Hard Rock Casino Rockford (6)	Rockford, IL	815 Entertainment/Rockford Lease	—	26.4	—	—
			28,705,551	5,231.9	835.6	14,780

Other Properties
Other owned buildings and land (7)	various	N/A	23,400	24.5	—	—





Total			28,728,951	5,256.4	835.6	14,780

(1)Square footage includes air-conditioned space and excludes parking garages and barns.

(2)Leased acreage reflects land subject to leases with third-parties and includes land on which certain of the current facilities and ancillary supporting structures are located as well as parking lots and access rights.

(3) These properties include hotels not owned by the Company. Square footage and rooms associated with properties not owned by GLPI are excluded from the table above.

(4) Encompasses two gaming properties in Jackpot, Nevada: Cactus Pete's and The Horseshu.

(5) Encompasses three gaming properties in Black Hawk, CO: Black Hawk North, Black Hawk East, and Black Hawk West.

(6) These properties are accounted for as financing leases and are not included in real estate investments. See Note 7 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

(7) This includes our corporate headquarters building and undeveloped land the Company owns at locations other than its tenant occupied properties.

Competition

We compete for additional real property investments with other REITs, including a publicly traded gaming focused REIT, VICI Properties Inc., investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, lenders, gaming companies and other investors. Some of our competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we have, making it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives.

In addition, percentage rent revenues that apply to certain of our leases are dependent on the ability of our gaming tenants to compete with other gaming operators. The gaming industry is characterized by an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming, emerging varieties of internet gaming, sports betting and other forms of gaming in the U.S. In a broader sense, our gaming tenants and operators face competition from all manner of leisure and entertainment activities, including: shopping, athletic events, television and movies, concerts and travel. Legalized gaming is currently permitted in various forms throughout the U.S., in several Canadian provinces and on various lands taken into trust for the benefit of certain Native Americans in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, established gaming

/12

Table of Contents

jurisdictions could award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion or relocation of existing gaming operations. New, relocated or expanded operations by other parties may increase competition for our gaming tenants and could have a material adverse impact on our gaming tenants and us as landlord. Finally, the imposition of smoking bans and/or higher gaming tax rates have a significant impact on our gaming tenants' ability to compete with facilities in nearby jurisdictions.

Segments

Due to the sale of the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge that occurred in 2021, the Company's operations consist solely of investments in real estate for which all such real estate properties are similar to one another in that they consist of destination and leisure properties and related offerings, whose tenants offer casino gaming, hotel, convention, dining, entertainment and retail amenities, have similar economic characteristics and are governed by triple-net operating leases. The operating results of the Company's real estate investments are reviewed in the aggregate, by the chief operating decision maker (as such term is defined in ASC 280 - Segment Reporting). As such, as of January 1, 2022, the Company has one reportable segment.

Information about our Executive Officers


Name	Age	Position
Peter M. Carlino	77	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Brandon J. Moore	49	Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
Desiree A. Burke	58	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Matthew R. Demchyk	42	Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer
Steven L. Ladany	43	Senior Vice President, Chief Development Officer

Peter M. Carlino. Mr. Carlino has been the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since the Company's inception in November 2013. Mr. Carlino was the founder of PENN and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1994 through October 2013. Mr. Carlino also served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of PENN from April 1994 through May 28, 2019. Mr. Carlino continues to serve as Chairman Emeritus on PENN's Board of Directors and has served in such position since June 2019. Mr. Carlino has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and as Chief Executive Officer for PENN, and now the Company, collectively for over 25 years.

Brandon J. Moore. Mr. Moore is our Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Moore was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in October 2022 and joined the Company in January 2014. Previously, he served as PENN's Vice President, Senior Corporate Counsel from March 2010 where he was a member of the legal team responsible for a variety of transactional, regulatory and general legal matters. Prior to joining PENN, Mr. Moore was with Ballard Spahr LLP, where he provided advanced legal counsel to clients on matters including merger and acquisition transactions, debt and equity financings, and various other matters.

Desiree A. Burke. Ms. Burke is our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. She was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in October 2022 and joined the Company in April 2014 as our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Previously, Ms. Burke served as PENN's Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from November 2009. Additionally, she served as PENN's Vice President and Corporate Controller from November 2005 to October 2009. Prior to her time at PENN, Ms. Burke was the Executive Vice President/Director of Financial Reporting and Control for MBNA America Bank, N.A. She joined MBNA in 1994 and held positions of ascending responsibility in the finance department during her tenure. Ms. Burke is a CPA.

Matthew R. Demchyk. Mr. Demchyk became our Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer in January 2021 in which he leads the Company's investment strategy and is responsible for capital allocation. Mr. Demchyk joined the Company in February 2019 as our Senior Vice President of Investments. Previously, he served as Portfolio Manager of Real Estate Securities at Millennium Partners for nine years. Prior to joining Millennium Partners, he managed a portfolio of REIT equity securities at Carlson Capital and served as Assistant Portfolio Manager at CenterSquare Investment Management, a leading REIT dedicated asset manager. Mr. Demchyk is a CFA Charterholder.

Steven L. Ladany. Mr. Ladany became our Senior Vice President, Chief Development Officer in January 2021 and leads the Company's ongoing merger, acquisition and development efforts. Mr. Ladany joined the Company in September 2014 as Vice President, Finance and served in that role until March 2019, when he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Finance. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ladany served as a Vice President at Revel Casino Hotel, a regional gaming property currently known as Ocean Casino Resort, and as a Vice President at J.P. Morgan in the Syndicated and Leveraged Finance group within the firm's investment banking division.

/13

Table of Contents

Tax Considerations

We intend to continue to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual operating results, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Code. Our ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT also requires that we satisfy certain tests, some of which depend upon the fair market values of assets that we own directly or indirectly. The material qualification requirements are summarized below. Such values may not be susceptible to a precise determination. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of our operations for any taxable year will satisfy such requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. Additionally, while we intend to operate so that we continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") will not challenge our qualification, or that we will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT requirements in the future.

Taxation of REITs in General

As a REIT, generally we will be entitled to a deduction for dividends that we pay and therefore will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our net REIT taxable income that is currently distributed to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the "double taxation" at the corporate and shareholder levels that generally results from an investment in a C corporation. A "C corporation" is a corporation that generally is required to pay tax at the corporate level. Double taxation means taxation once at the corporate level when income is earned and once again at the shareholder level when the net earnings and profits are distributed as dividends. In general, the income that we generate is taxed only at the shareholder level upon a distribution of dividends to our shareholders. We will nonetheless be subject to U.S. federal tax in the following circumstances:

•We will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed net taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains.

•If we have net income from prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a 100% tax.

•If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or certain leasehold terminations as "foreclosure property," we may thereby avoid the 100% tax on gain from a resale of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction), but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate (currently 21%).

•If we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test and/or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because we satisfy other requirements, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount based on the magnitude of the failure, as adjusted to reflect the profit margin associated with our gross income.

•If we violate the asset tests (other than certain de minimis violations) or other requirements applicable to REITs, as described below, and yet maintain our qualification as a REIT because there is reasonable cause for the failure and other applicable requirements are met, we may be subject to a penalty tax. In that case, the amount of the penalty tax will be at least $50,000 per failure, and, in the case of certain asset test failures, will be determined as the amount of net income generated by the nonqualifying assets in question multiplied by the highest corporate tax rate (currently 21%) if that amount exceeds $50,000 per failure.

•If we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for such year and (iii) any undistributed net taxable income from prior periods, we will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (a) the amounts that we actually distributed and (b) the amounts we retained and upon which we paid income tax at the corporate level.

•We may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet record-keeping requirements intended to monitor our compliance with rules relating to the composition of a REIT's shareholders.

•A 100% tax may be imposed on transactions between us and a TRS that do not reflect arm's-length terms.

/14

Table of Contents

•If we acquire appreciated assets from a corporation that is not a REIT (i.e., a corporation taxable under subchapter C of the Code) in a transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in our hands is determined by reference to the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the subchapter C corporation, we may be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax rate then applicable if we subsequently recognize gain on a disposition of any such assets during the five-year period following their acquisition from the subchapter C corporation.

•The earnings of our TRS will generally be subject to U.S. federal, state and corporate income tax, and we will be required to include, any dividends received from the TRS in our distribution tests.

In addition, we and our subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property, gross receipts and other taxes on our assets and operations. We could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.

Requirements for Qualification—General

The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of

beneficial interest;

(3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for its election to be subject to tax as a REIT;

(4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to specific provisions of the Code;

(5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

(6) in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is

owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer "individuals" (as defined in the Code to include specified tax-

exempt entities); and

(7) that meets other tests described below, including with respect to the nature of its income and assets.

The Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year, and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Conditions (5) and (6) need not be met during a corporation's initial tax year as a REIT (which, in our case, was 2014). Our charter provides restrictions regarding the ownership and transfers of our stock, which are intended to assist us in satisfying the stock ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. If we fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, except as provided in the next sentence, our status as a REIT will terminate. If, however, we comply with the rules contained in the applicable Treasury regulations that require us to ascertain the actual ownership of our shares and we do not know, or would not have known through the exercise of reasonable diligence, that we failed to meet the requirements described in condition (6) above, we will be treated as having met this requirement.

To monitor compliance with the stock ownership requirements, we generally are required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our stock. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of our stock pursuant to which the record holders must disclose the actual owners of the stock (i.e., the persons required to include our dividends in their gross income). We must maintain a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand as part of our records. We could be subject to monetary penalties if we fail to comply with these record-keeping requirements. If, upon request by the Company, a shareholder fails or refuses to comply with the demands, such holder will be required by Treasury regulations to submit a statement with his, her or its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of our stock and other information.

Qualified REIT Subsidiaries

The Code provides that a corporation that is a "qualified REIT subsidiary" shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of a "qualified REIT subsidiary" shall be treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT. A "qualified REIT subsidiary" is a corporation, all of the capital stock of which is owned by the REIT, that has not elected to be a "taxable REIT subsidiary" (discussed below). In applying the requirements described herein, all of our "qualified REIT subsidiaries" will be ignored, and all assets, liabilities

/15

Table of Contents

and items of income, deduction and credit of such subsidiaries will be treated as our assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit. These subsidiaries, therefore, will not be subject to federal corporate income taxation, although they may be subject to state and local taxation. During 2021, we had one qualified REIT subsidiary for most of the year, which elected to become a TRS in December 2021.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

In general, we may jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned, to treat such subsidiary corporation as a TRS. We generally may not own more than 10% of the securities of a taxable corporation, as measured by voting power or value, unless we and such corporation elect to treat such corporation as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS is not ignored for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, a TRS generally is subject to corporate income tax on its earnings, which may reduce the cash flow that we and our subsidiaries generate in the aggregate and may reduce our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

We are not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or as receiving any income that the TRS earns. Rather, the stock issued by the TRS to us is an asset in our hands, and we treat the dividends paid to us, if any, as income. This treatment can affect our income and asset test calculations, as described below. Because we do not include the assets and income of TRSs on a look-through basis in determining our compliance with the REIT requirements, we may use such entities to undertake indirectly activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude us from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries. For example, we may use a TRS to perform services or conduct activities that give rise to certain categories of income or to conduct activities that, if conducted by us directly, would be treated in our hands as prohibited transactions.

The TRS rules impose a 100% excise tax on transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT or the REIT's tenants that are not conducted on an arm's-length basis. We intend that all of our transactions with our TRS, if any, will be conducted on an arm's-length basis.

Ownership of Partnership Interests by a REIT

A REIT that is a partner in a partnership is deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership and is deemed to receive the income of the partnership attributable to such share. In addition, the character of the assets and gross income of the partnership retains the same character in the hands of the REIT (except that, for purposes of the 10% of value asset test described below, our proportionate share of the partnership’s assets is based on our proportionate interest in the equity and certain debt securities issued by the partnership, as described in the Code). Accordingly, our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities and items of income of the OP, as defined below, are treated as assets, liabilities and items of income of ours for purposes of applying the requirements described herein. We have control over the OP and intend to operate it in a manner that is consistent with the requirements for qualification of GLPI as a REIT.

Income Tests

As a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income requirements on an annual basis. First, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in "prohibited transactions," discharge of indebtedness and certain hedging transactions, generally must be derived from "rents from real property," gains from the sale of real estate assets (but not including certain debt instruments of publicly offered REITs that are not secured by mortgages on real property), interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities), dividends received from other REITs, and specified income from temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of our gross income in each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, discharge of indebtedness and certain hedging transactions, must be derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% gross income test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property. Income and gain from certain hedging transactions will be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

Rents received by a REIT will qualify as "rents from real property" in satisfying the gross income requirements described above only if several conditions are met.

•The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount received or accrued generally will not be excluded from the term "rents from real property" solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales.

•Rents received from a tenant will not qualify as "rents from real property" in satisfying the gross income tests if the REIT, or a direct or indirect owner of 10% or more of the REIT, directly or constructively, owns 10% or more of such tenant (a "Related Party Tenant"). However, rental payments from a TRS will qualify as rents from real property even

/16

Table of Contents

if we own more than 10% of the total value or combined voting power of the TRS if (i) at least 90% of the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for comparable space or (ii) the property leased is a "qualified lodging facility," as defined in Section 856(d)(9)(D) of the Code, or a "qualified health care property," as defined in Section 856(e)(6)(D)(i) of the Code, and certain other conditions are satisfied.

•Rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property will not qualify as "rents from real property" if such rent exceeds 15% of the total rent received under the lease.

•The REIT generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or render services to tenants, except through an "independent contractor" who is adequately compensated and from whom the REIT derives no income, or through a TRS. The "independent contractor" requirement, however, does not apply to the extent the services provided by the REIT are "usually or customarily rendered" in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only, and are not otherwise considered "rendered to the occupant." In addition, a de minimis rule applies with respect to non-customary services. Specifically, if the value of the non-customary service income with respect to a property (valued at no less than 150% of the direct costs of performing such services) is 1% or less of the total income derived from the property, then all rental income except the non-customary service income will qualify as "rents from real property." A TRS may provide services (including noncustomary services) to a REIT’s tenants without "tainting" any of the rental income received by the REIT, and will be able to manage or operate properties for third parties and generally engage in other activities unrelated to real estate.

We do not anticipate receiving rent that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person (except by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales consistent with the rules described above). Our former parent, PENN, received a private letter ruling from the IRS prior to the Spin-Off that concluded certain rental formulas under the PENN Master Lease will not cause any amounts received under the PENN Master Lease to be treated as other than rents from real property. While we do not expect to seek similar rulings for additional leases we enter into that have substantially similar terms as the PENN Master Lease, we intend to treat amounts received under those leases consistent with the conclusions in the ruling, though there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge such treatment. We also do not anticipate receiving more than a de minimis amount of rents from any Related Party Tenant or rents attributable to personal property leased in connection with real property that will exceed 15% of the total rents received with respect to such real property. We may receive certain types of income that will not qualify under the 75% or 95% gross income tests. In particular, dividends received from a TRS will not qualify under the 75% test. We believe, however, that the aggregate amount of such items and other non-qualifying income in any taxable year will not cause GLPI to exceed the limits on non-qualifying income under either the 75% or 95% gross income tests.

We may directly or indirectly receive distributions from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified REIT subsidiaries. These distributions generally are treated as dividend income to the extent of the earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any dividends that we receive from another REIT or qualified REIT subsidiary, however, will be qualifying income for purposes of both the 95% and 75% gross income tests.

We believe that we have and will continue to be in compliance with these gross income tests. If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may still qualify to be taxed as a REIT for such year if we are entitled to relief under applicable provisions of the Code. These relief provisions will be generally available if (i) our failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and (ii) following our identification of the failure to meet the 75% or 95% gross income test for any taxable year, we file a schedule with the IRS setting forth each item of our gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test for such taxable year in accordance with Treasury regulations. It is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances, we will not qualify to be taxed as a REIT. Even if these relief provisions apply, and we retain our status as a REIT, the Code imposes a tax based upon the amount by which we fail to satisfy the particular gross income test.

Asset Tests

At the close of each calendar quarter, we must also satisfy five tests relating to the nature of our assets. First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by some combination of "real estate assets," cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this purpose, real estate assets include interests in real property (such as land, buildings, leasehold interest in real property and, for taxable years that began on or after January 1, 2016, personal property leased with real property if the rents attributable to the personal property would be rents from real property under the income tests discussed above), interests in mortgages on real property or

/17

Table of Contents

on interests in real property, shares in other qualifying REITs, and stock or debt instruments held for less than one year purchased with the proceeds from an offering of shares of our stock or certain debt and, for tax years that began on or after January 1, 2016, debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs. Assets that do not qualify for purposes of the 75% asset test are subject to the additional asset tests described below.

Second, the value of any one issuer's securities that we own may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets.

Third, we may not own more than 10% of any one issuer's outstanding securities, as measured by either voting power or value. The 5% and 10% asset tests do not apply to securities of TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiaries and the 10% asset test does not apply to "straight debt" having specified characteristics and to certain other securities described below. Solely for purposes of the 10% asset test, the determination of our interest in the assets of a partnership or limited liability company in which we own an interest will be based on our proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership or limited liability company, excluding for this purpose, certain securities described in the Code. The safe harbor under which certain types of securities are disregarded for purposes of the 10% value limitation includes (1) straight debt securities (including straight debt securities that provide for certain contingent payments); (2) any loan to an individual or an estate; (3) any rental agreement described in Section 467 of the Code, other than with a "related person"; (4) any obligation to pay rents from real property; (5) certain securities issued by a State or any political subdivision thereof, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (6) any security issued by a REIT; and (7) any other arrangement that, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, is excepted from the definition of a security. In addition, for purposes of applying the 10% value limitation, (a) a REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security; (b) any debt instrument issued by a partnership is not treated as a security if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income is from sources that would qualify for the 75% REIT gross income test; and (c) any debt instrument issued by a partnership is not treated as a security to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership.

Fourth, the aggregate value of all securities of TRSs that we hold, together with other non-qualified assets (such as furniture and equipment or other tangible personal property, or non-real estate securities) may not, in the aggregate, exceed 20% of the value of our total assets.

Fifth, not more than 25% of the value of our gross assets may be represented by debt instruments of publicly offered REITs that are not secured by mortgages on real property or interests in real property.

However, certain relief provisions are available to allow REITs to satisfy the asset requirements or to maintain REIT qualification notwithstanding certain violations of the asset and other requirements. For example, if we should fail to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, such a failure would not cause us to lose our REIT qualification if we (i) satisfied the asset tests at the close of the preceding calendar quarter and (ii) the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset requirements was not wholly or partly caused by an acquisition of non-qualifying assets, but instead arose from changes in the relative market values of our assets. If the condition described in (ii) was not satisfied, we still could avoid disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close of the calendar quarter in which it arose or by making use of the relief provisions described above.

In the case of de minimis violations of the 10% and 5% asset tests, a REIT may maintain its qualification despite a violation of such requirements if (i) the value of the assets causing the violation does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT's total assets and $10,000,000 and (ii) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within six months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or the relevant tests are otherwise satisfied within that time frame.

Even if we did not qualify for the foregoing relief provisions, one additional provision allows a REIT which fails one or more of the asset requirements to nevertheless maintain its REIT qualification if (i) the REIT provides the IRS with a description of each asset causing the failure, (ii) the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (iii) the REIT pays a tax equal to the greater of (a) $50,000 per failure and (b) the product of the net income generated by the assets that caused the failure multiplied by the highest applicable corporate tax rate (currently 21%) and (iv) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within six months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or otherwise satisfies the relevant asset tests within that time frame.

We believe that we have been and will continue to be in compliance with the asset tests described above.

Annual Distribution Requirements

In order to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to:

(i)the sum of

/18

Table of Contents

(a) 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to our net capital gains and the deduction for dividends paid; and

(b) 90% of our after tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property (as described below); minus

(ii)the excess of the sum of specified items of non-cash income over 5% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to our net capital gain and the deduction for dividends paid.

We generally must make these distributions in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for the year and if paid with or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration. These distributions will be treated as received by our shareholders in the year in which paid. In order for distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions must not be "preferential dividends." A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is (i) pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class and (ii) in accordance with any preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. Given our status as a "publicly offered REIT" (within the meaning of the Code), the preferential dividend rules do not apply to us for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

To the extent that we distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate tax rates on the retained portion. We may elect to retain, rather than distribute, some or all of our net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such gains. In this case, we could elect for our shareholders to include their proportionate shares of such undistributed long-term capital gains in income, and to receive a corresponding credit for their share of the tax that we paid. Our shareholders would then increase the adjusted basis of their stock by the difference between (i) the amounts of capital gain dividends that we designated and that they include in their taxable income, minus (ii) the tax that we paid on their behalf with respect to that income.

To the extent that in the future we may have available net operating losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.

If we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for such year and (iii) any undistributed net taxable income from prior periods, we will be subject to a non-deductible 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (a) the amounts actually distributed, plus (b) the amounts of income we retained and on which we have paid corporate income tax.

We expect that our REIT taxable income will be less than our cash flow because of depreciation and other non-cash charges included in computing REIT taxable income. Accordingly, we anticipate that we generally will have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the distribution requirements described above. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet these distribution requirements due to timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, and the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses in determining our taxable income. In addition, we may decide to retain our cash, rather than distribute it, in order to repay debt, acquire assets, or for other reasons. If these timing differences occur, we may borrow funds to pay dividends or pay dividends through the distribution of other property (including shares of our stock) in order to meet the distribution requirements, while preserving our cash.

If our taxable income for a particular year is subsequently determined to have been understated, we may be able to rectify a resultant failure to meet the distribution requirements for a year by paying "deficiency dividends" to shareholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, we may be able to avoid losing REIT qualification or being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends, subject to the 4% excise tax described above. We will be required to pay interest based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.

For purposes of the 90% distribution requirement and excise tax described above, any distribution must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if such distributions are declared in October, November or December of the taxable year, are payable to shareholders of record on a specified date in any such month, and are actually paid before the end of January of the following year. Such distributions are treated as both paid by us and received by our shareholders on December 31 of the year in which they are declared.

In addition, at our election, a distribution for a taxable year may be declared before we timely file our tax return for the year, provided we pay such distribution with or before our first regular dividend payment after such declaration, and such payment is made during the 12-month period following the close of such taxable year. Such distributions are taxable to our shareholders in the year in which paid, even though the distributions relate to our prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement.

/19

Table of Contents

We believe that we have satisfied the annual distribution requirements for the year ended December 31, 2023. Although we intend to satisfy the annual distribution requirements to continue to qualify as a REIT for the year ending December 31, 2024 and thereafter, economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations could limit our ability to meet those requirements.

Failure to Qualify

If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification other than the income or asset tests, we could avoid disqualification as a REIT if our failure is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect and we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure. Relief provisions are also available for failures of the income tests and asset tests, as described above in "Income Tests" and "Asset Tests."

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and the relief provisions described above do not apply, we would be subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We cannot deduct distributions to shareholders in any year in which we are not a REIT, nor would we be required to make distributions in such a year. In this situation, to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes), distributions to shareholders would be taxable as regular corporate dividends. Such dividends paid to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates may be taxable at the preferential income tax rates (i.e., currently the 20% maximum U.S. federal rate) for qualified dividends. In addition, subject to the limitations of the Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we would also be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification. It is not possible to state whether, in all circumstances, we would be entitled to this statutory relief.

2021 GLP Holdings Inc. Operating Asset Sales, TRS Merger, and E&P Purging Distribution

On December 17, 2021, we completed our sale of the membership interests of Louisiana Casino Cruises, LLC to a third-party operator and tenant, which was preceded by its conversion from a C corporation and transfer of the real property assets to GLP Holdings, Inc. We completed a similar transaction with PENN involving the membership interests of Penn Cecil Maryland, LLC in July 2021. On December 23, 2021, GLP Holdings, Inc. was merged with and into GLP Capital, L.P. in a transaction which was intended to be treated as a tax-free liquidation of GLP Holdings, Inc., a TRS, into the REIT. The result of such transaction was intended to wind up GLP Holdings, Inc. after its taxable sale of the operating assets and have the REIT receive the real property assets in a carryover basis transaction for income tax purposes prior to the completion of the UPREIT Transaction discussed below. As a result of the tax-free nature of the transaction, the REIT inherited all of GLP Holdings, Inc.'s C corporation earnings and profits earned while it was a TRS. Under Section 857 of the Code, as of the close of the taxable year, a REIT must not have earnings and profits which were accumulated in any non-REIT year, so the REIT was required to distribute any GLP Holdings, Inc. earnings and profits which had accumulated prior to its merger with GLP Capital, L.P. The Company’s Board of Directors declared a special earnings and profits cash dividend of $0.24 per share of its common stock payable on January 7, 2022 to shareholders of record on December 27, 2021. We believe that in accordance with Code Section 857(b)(9), such dividend will be treated as having been paid by the REIT and received by the REIT shareholders on or prior to December 31, 2021 to the extent it was treated as satisfying the REIT’s requirements to purge any earnings and profits from a non-REIT year.

2021 UPREIT Transaction

On December 29, 2021, we completed a transaction with Cordish whereby they contributed certain real property assets into GLP Capital (our operating partnership, or the “OP”) in exchange for newly issued partnership interests in the OP. As a result of the contribution, the UPREIT Transaction was consummated. Prior to the UPREIT Transaction, the OP was owned by the REIT and another entity wholly owned by the REIT and disregarded for income tax purposes, making the OP disregarded as separate from the REIT. The structure of the transaction is intended to allow the REIT to still receive rents from real property on a passthrough basis from the OP, and it will continue to own an interest in real property through its ownership of the OP partnership interests as its sole asset, as discussed below. Based on this, we believe that the UPREIT Transaction will not impact our ability to meet the requirements of the REIT asset, income, and distribution tests described above.

Tax Aspects of Investment in the Operating Partnership

We may hold investments through entities that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including our interest in the OP. In general, partnerships are passthrough entities that are not subject to U.S. federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated their proportionate shares of the items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of a partnership, and are subject to tax on these items without regard to whether the partners receive a distribution from the partnership. We will include in our income our proportionate share of these partnership items of the OP for purposes of the various REIT income

/20

Table of Contents

tests and in the computation of our REIT taxable income. Moreover, for purposes of the REIT asset tests, we will include our proportionate share of assets held by the OP.

The investment by us in the OP involves special tax considerations, including the possibility of a challenge by the IRS to the status of the OP as a partnership, as opposed to an association taxable as a corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the OP were treated as an association for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation and, therefore, could be subject to an entity-level tax on its income.

Treasury regulations provide that a domestic business entity not otherwise organized as a corporation may elect to be treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Generally, an entity will be classified as a partnership or disregarded entity (depending on its number of owners) for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless it elects otherwise. The OP intends to be classified as a partnership under these Treasury regulations. We have not requested and do not intend to request a ruling from the IRS that the OP will be classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

To be a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the OP generally must not be a “publicly traded partnership”. A publicly traded partnership is a partnership whose interests are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market (or a substantial equivalent). A publicly traded partnership is generally treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but will not be so treated if, for each taxable year beginning after December 31, 1987 in which it was classified as a publicly traded partnership, at least 90% of the partnership’s gross income consisted of specified passive income, including real property rents (which includes rents that would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, with certain modifications that make it easier for the rents to qualify for the 90% passive income exception), gains from the sale or other disposition of real property, interest, and dividends (the “90% passive income exception”).

Treasury regulations provide limited safe harbors from treatment as a publicly traded partnership. We expect that the OP will fall within one of the “safe harbors” for the partnership to avoid being classified as a publicly traded partnership. However, no assurance can be given regarding the OP's ability to satisfy the requirements of some of these safe harbors and accordingly no assurance can be given that the OP would not be treated as a publicly traded partnership. Even if the OP failed to meet one of the safe harbors, it generally will not be treated as a corporation if it qualifies for the 90% passive income exception discussed immediately above.

Partnership Allocations

Although a partnership agreement generally will determine the allocation of income and losses among partners, such allocations will be disregarded for tax purposes if they do not comply with the provisions of Section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, which require that partnership allocations respect the economic arrangement of the partners. If an allocation is not recognized for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the item subject to the allocation will be reallocated in accordance with the partners’ interests in the partnership, which will be determined considering all of the facts and circumstances relating to the economic arrangement of the partners with respect to such item. The OP’s allocations of taxable income and loss are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder.

Pursuant to Section 704(c) of the Code, items of income, gain, loss, and deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership must be allocated for U.S. federal income tax purposes in a manner such that the contributor is charged with or benefits from the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or unrealized loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair market value of the contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the time of contribution. Such allocations are solely for U.S. federal income tax purposes and do not affect other economic or legal arrangements among the partners.

Our OP has entered into transactions involving the contribution to the OP of appreciated property, and the OP may enter into such transactions in the future. The partnership agreement of the OP requires allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction attributable to contributed property to be made in a manner that is consistent with Section 704(c) of the Code. Treasury regulations issued under Section 704(c) give partnerships a choice of several methods of allocating taxable income with respect to contributed properties (and the tax protection agreements entered into in connection with the contributions of properties to the OP require that a certain method be used). Depending upon the method used, (1) our tax depreciation deductions attributable to those properties may be lower than they would have been if our OP had acquired those properties for cash and (2) in the event of a sale of such properties, we could be allocated gain in excess of our corresponding economic or book gain. These allocations may cause us to recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds received by us, which might

/21

Table of Contents

adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT distribution requirements or result in our shareholders recognizing additional dividend income without an increase in distributions.

Assets contributed to a partnership in a tax-free transaction generally retain the same depreciation method and recovery period as they had in the hands of the partner who contributed them to the partnership. Accordingly, a substantial amount of the OP’s depreciation deductions for its real property are based on the historic tax depreciation schedules for the properties prior to their contribution to the OP.

Basis in OP Interest

Our adjusted tax basis in a partnership in which we have an interest (including the OP) generally (1) will be equal to the amount of cash and the basis of any other property contributed to such partnership by us, (2) will be increased by (a) our allocable share of such partnership’s income and (b) our allocable share of any indebtedness of such partnership, and (3) will be reduced, but not below zero, by our allocable share of (a) such partnership’s loss and (b) the amount of cash and the tax basis of any property distributed to us and by constructive distributions resulting from a reduction in our share of indebtedness of such partnership.

If our allocable share of the loss (or portion thereof) of any partnership in which we have an interest would reduce the adjusted tax basis of our partnership interest in such partnership below zero, the recognition of such loss will be deferred until such time as the recognition of such loss (or portion thereof) would not reduce our adjusted tax basis below zero. To the extent that distributions to us from a partnership, or any decrease in our share of the nonrecourse indebtedness of a partnership (each such decrease being considered a constructive cash distribution to the partners), would reduce our adjusted tax basis below zero, such distributions (including such constructive distributions) would constitute taxable income to us. Such distributions and constructive distributions normally would be characterized as long-term capital gain if our interest in such partnership has been held for longer than the long-term capital gain holding period (currently 12 months).

Sale of Partnership Property

Generally, any gain realized by a partnership on the sale of property held by the partnership for more than 12 months will be long-term capital gain, except for any portion of such gain that is treated as depreciation or cost recovery recapture. However, under requirements applicable to REITs under the Code, our share as a partner of any gain realized by the OP on the sale of any property held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax.

Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs and Partnerships

The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the Treasury which may result in statutory changes as well as revisions to regulations and interpretations. Changes to the U.S. federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our common stock.

On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, known as the Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018 (the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act") was signed into law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made significant changes to the U.S. federal income taxation of individuals and corporations, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. In addition to reducing corporate and individual income tax rates, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates or restricts various deductions that, along with other provisions, may change the way that we calculate our REIT taxable income and our TRS's taxable income. Significant provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that investors should be aware of include provisions that: (i) lower the corporate income tax rate to 21%, (ii) provide noncorporate taxpayers with a deduction of up to 20% of certain income earned through partnerships and REITs, (iii) limit the net operating loss deduction to 80% of taxable income, where taxable income is determined without regard to the net operating loss deduction itself, generally eliminates net operating loss carry backs and allow unused net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely, (iv) expand the ability of businesses to deduct the cost of certain property investments in the year in which the property is purchased, and (v) generally lower tax rates for individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers, while limiting deductions such as miscellaneous itemized deductions and state and local tax deductions. In addition, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act limits the deduction for net interest expense incurred by a business to 30% of the "adjusted taxable income" of the taxpayer. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Stability Act increased the limitation to 50% of “adjusted taxable income” for tax years beginning in 2019 and 2020. The limitation on the interest expense deduction does not apply to certain small-business taxpayers or electing real property trades or businesses, such as any real property development, redevelopment, construction,

/22

Table of Contents

reconstruction, acquisition, conversion, rental, operation, management, leasing, or brokerage trade or business. Making the election to be treated as a real property trade or business requires the electing real property trade or business to depreciate non-residential real property, residential rental property, and qualified improvement property over a longer period using the alternative depreciation system. We have not yet elected out of the new interest expense limitation.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “BBA”) revised the rules applicable to federal income tax audits of partnerships (such as the OP) and the collection of any tax resulting from any such audits or other tax proceedings, generally for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Under the applicable rules, a partnership itself may be liable for a tax computed by reference to the hypothetical increase in partner-level taxes (including interest and penalties) resulting from an adjustment of partnership tax items on audit, regardless of changes in the composition of the partners (or their relative ownership) between the year under audit and the year of the adjustment. The rules also include an elective alternative method under which the additional taxes resulting from the adjustment are assessed against the affected partners, subject to a higher rate of interest than otherwise would apply. Although it is uncertain how these rules will be implemented, it is possible that they could result in partnerships in which we directly or indirectly invest being required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties as a result of an audit adjustment, and we, as a direct or indirect partner of those partnerships could be required to bear the economic burden of those taxes, interest and penalties even though we, as a REIT, may not otherwise have been required to pay additional corporate-level taxes as a result of the related audit adjustment. The changes created by these rules are sweeping and, in some respects, dependent on the promulgation of future regulations or other guidance by the U.S. Treasury.

Shareholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to the impact that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the BBA, and other legislation may have on their investment and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on their investment in our shares.

Supplemental U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion supplements and updates the disclosures under “Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” in the prospectus dated August 12, 2022, contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on August 12, 2022. Capitalized terms herein that are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as when used in such disclosures (as supplemented).

On December 29, 2022, the Internal Revenue Service promulgated final Treasury Regulations under Sections 897, 1441, 1445, and 1446 of the Code that were, in part, intended to coordinate various withholding regimes for non-U.S. stockholders. The new Treasury Regulations provide guidance regarding qualified foreign pension funds and are in large part consistent with the previously issued proposed Treasury Regulations.

Accordingly, the last two sentences of the first paragraph under the heading “Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Stockholders and Potential Tax Consequences of Their Investment in Shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock—Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders—Qualified Foreign Pension Funds” are hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

Under Treasury Regulations, subject to the discussion below regarding “qualified holders,” a “qualified controlled entity” also is not generally treated as a foreign person for purposes of FIRPTA. A qualified controlled entity generally includes a trust or corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country all of the interests of which are held by one or more qualified foreign pension funds either directly or indirectly through one or more qualified controlled entities.

Additionally, the following two paragraphs are added after the first paragraph under the heading “Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Stockholders and Potential Tax Consequences of Their Investment in Shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock—Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders—Qualified Foreign Pension Funds”:

Treasury Regulations further require that a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity will not be exempt from FIRPTA with respect to dispositions of U.S. real property interests or REIT distributions attributable to the same unless the qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity is a “qualified holder.” To be a qualified holder, a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity must satisfy one of two alternative tests at the time of the disposition of the U.S. real property interest or the REIT distribution. Under the first test, a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity is a qualified holder if it owned no U.S. real property interests as of the earliest date during an uninterrupted period ending on the date of the disposition or distribution during which it qualified as a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity. Alternatively, if a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity held U.S. real property interests as of the earliest date during the period described in the preceding sentence, it can be a qualified holder only if it satisfies certain testing period requirements.

/23

Table of Contents

Treasury Regulations also provide that a foreign partnership all of the interests of which are held by qualified holders, including through one or more partnerships, may certify its status as such and will not be treated as a foreign person for purposes of withholding under FIRPTA.

Regulation

The ownership, operation, and management of, and provision of certain products and services to, gaming and racing facilities are subject to pervasive regulation. Gaming laws are generally based upon declarations of public policy designed to protect gaming consumers and the viability and integrity of the gaming industry. Gaming laws also may be designed to protect and maximize state and local revenues derived through taxes and licensing fees imposed on gaming industry participants as well as to enhance economic development and tourism. To accomplish these public policy goals, gaming laws establish procedures to ensure that participants in the gaming industry, including landlords and other suppliers of products and services to gaming operators, meet certain standards of character and suitability to hold a gaming license. In addition, gaming laws require gaming industry participants to:

•ensure that unsuitable individuals and organizations have no role in asset ownership and/or the operations of gaming assets, and in those jurisdictions that require landowner licensure, ownership of the real property;

•ensure transparency through periodic reporting around certain events, including levels of ownership and control, and licensure for those deemed necessary by the regulators;

•establish procedures designed to prevent cheating and fraudulent practices;

•establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures;

•maintain effective controls over their financial practices, including establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues;

•maintain systems for reliable record keeping;

•ensure that contracts and financial transactions are commercially reasonable, reflect fair market value and are arms-length transactions; and

•establish programs to promote responsible gaming.

These regulations impact our business insomuch as the gaming and racing regulatory agencies in the jurisdictions in which we own real estate and our gaming tenants operate require GLPI and its affiliates to maintain a license or finding of suitability as a key business entity, principal affiliate, business entity, qualifier, operator or supplier because of its status as landlord. We are presently licensed by gaming and racing regulatory agencies in the following jurisdictions: Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Rhode Island and Pennsylvania.

Our businesses and those operated by our tenants are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations including gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, health care, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.

Insurance

We maintain comprehensive general liability, commercial property, fiduciary, directors and officers liability, and business interruption insurance covering our business. In regards to our properties subject to triple-net leases, those lease agreements require our tenants to procure and maintain their own comprehensive general liability, commercial property and business interruption coverage, including all insurance mandated by law, including protection for our insurable interests as the landlord.

/24

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

Our properties are subject to U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws governing and regulating, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges and the handling and disposal of wastes, including medical wastes, and required actions and response efforts. Certain of the properties we own utilize or have utilized above or underground storage tanks to store oil and certain fuels for use at the properties. Other properties were built during the time that asbestos-containing building materials were routinely installed in residential and commercial structures. Certain of the real estate assets owned by GLPI were developed and constructed on remediated former commercial and industrial sites. In connection with the ownership of our real property assets, we could be found legally responsible for environmental liabilities or costs relating to a release of hazardous substances or other regulated materials at or emanating from such property.

Pursuant to applicable environmental laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to investigate, remove and/or remediate a release of hazardous substances or other regulated materials at, or emanating from, such property. Further, under certain circumstances, such owners or operators of real property may be held liable for property damage, personal injury and/or natural resource damage resulting from or arising in connection with such releases. Certain of these laws have been interpreted to provide for joint and several liability unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. We also may be liable under certain of these laws for damage that occurred prior to our ownership of a property or at a site where we or our tenants sent wastes for disposal.

For most triple-net leases to which we are a party, environmental liabilities arising from the businesses and operations are retained by our tenants, and the tenants are required to indemnify GLPI (and its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and certain other related parties) against any claims, losses, orders or fines arising from or relating to such environmental liabilities. Further, our triple-net leases obligate our tenants thereunder to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations. We expect that future leases with new parties and renewals with existing tenants will include the same provisions. A tenant’s failure to comply could result in fines and penalties or the requirement to undertake corrective actions which could result in significant costs to the tenant and thus adversely affect their ability to meet their obligations to us.

As part of the Company's due diligence process prior to acquiring real estate assets we routinely commission environmental assessments to assess the potential for such liability. We are not aware of any environmental issues, potential litigation or recognized environmental conditions that are expected to have a material impact on the operations of any of our properties or that would materially impact our ownership of those real estate assets.

Corporate Responsibility and Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG)

We believe that corporate responsibility, including environmental and community stewardship, is an integral component of being a responsible corporate citizen. With this in mind, we continue to integrate ESG practices and implement social and sustainability strategies and initiatives into our overall business strategies intended to create long-term value for our shareholders, employees and other stakeholders.

ESG opportunities, risks and strategy are developed and managed by the Company’s management team collaboratively with the Company's cross-functional ESG Steering Committee. The Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees Company matters relating to ESG, including oversight of the Company’s policies and strategies relating to human capital management, corporate culture, and diversity, equity, and inclusion, which are discussed thoughtfully by the Committee and reported to our Board of Directors. The ESG Steering Committee meets regularly and reports to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on a quarterly basis and more frequently, as needed.

Environmental Sustainability

We are committed to conducting our business in an environmentally conscious manner. We strive to maintain a corporate environment that fosters a sense of community and well-being and that encourages our employees to focus on their long-term success along with the long-term success of the Company. We promote sustainable practices and environmental stewardship throughout the organization, with a particular emphasis on energy efficiency, recycling, indoor environmental quality, and environmental awareness.

With the exception of our corporate headquarters, our properties are leased to gaming operators pursuant to triple-net lease agreements, meaning each operator is responsible for business operations, maintenance, insurance, taxes, utilities, and

/25

Table of Contents

other property-related expenses, including with respect to all ESG strategies. The oversight and control of all energy and water usage and consumption and operations-related sustainability strategies related thereto is the sole responsibility of our tenants. Consequently, fostering a strong channel of communication with our tenants is an important component in the evolution of the environmental sustainability of our properties and establishing long-term, successful relationships is critical to the success of our business. Through our formalized Tenant Partnership Program, we discussed the importance of collecting and sharing utility data. To reinforce our level of commitment and support to tenants in these areas, we provided them with accessibility and use, at no charge, to a third-party platform to aid in the aggregation and compilation and reporting of utility data to encourage enhanced transparency and to aid in determining greenhouse gas emissions at our properties. As of December 31, 2023, we had 100% agreement from our tenants to provide utility data for those properties. We are committed to offering continued support to our tenants in the area of data sharing and sustainability. We also implemented certain green lease provisions, which include data collection obligations in many of our leases.

We are evaluating climate-related risks and opportunities to include in our near and long-term environmental strategies. We published our first standalone ESG Tearsheet in 2022 and expect to publish our inaugural standalone Corporate Responsibility Report with updated metrics and environmental data in the first quarter of 2024. We also refined our process for Scope 1 and 2 emissions data collection and reporting through the engagement of a third-party vendor.

The growth of our business often involves the acquisition of real estate assets from third parties. In furtherance of our commitment to environmental sustainability, we routinely engage nationally recognized and certified environmental engineers to perform Phase I Environmental Site Assessments as part of our acquisition process and require future tenants to ensure compliance with all environmental laws, including any necessary testing, remediation and/or monitoring.

Recognizing that sustainability is a journey, we are committed to continuous improvement and will endeavor to engage and communicate with our key stakeholders regarding our ESG stewardship. Further, we are committed to developing initiatives to address and mitigate those environmental risks within our control and supporting our tenants to do the same. In 2023, we completed portfolio wide inspections of all of the leased real estate owned by the Company, which also included a comprehensive ESG and climate assessment component.

Human Capital Management

As of December 31, 2023, we had 18 full-time employees. Our employees are a valued asset and integral to the success of the Company. We strive to prioritize our employees’ education, development, growth, and well-being. We are passionate about developing our talent. We provide tuition reimbursement, professional development reimbursement, and performance appraisals. We are committed to continuing to develop strategies focused on employee growth, development and well-being.

Senior management holds employee meetings and social events at a regular cadence to create an open forum for learning and to foster feedback.

Every employee receives an annual grant of GLPI restricted stock that vests over a three-year period. This program was proposed and instituted by our Chairman and CEO as a way to attract and maintain talent across all levels of the organization and to ensure that every employee has a stake in the Company’s continued growth and success.

We offer competitive and balanced benefits, including a flexible work policy designed to ensure a healthy work-life balance as well as flexible summer hours. Our array of other well-being and benefits packages includes a 401(k) plan with employer match, family leave, a health and fitness facility at the corporate campus and an employee assistance plan (EAP), among other non-salary benefits. The Company also offers paid time off for volunteering and community involvement.

Our view of human capital management extends beyond our employees to our vendors and other third parties with whom we do business. Our adoption of our Vendor Code of Conduct was designed to ensure that we engage individuals and businesses that are committed to the health and well-being of their employees as well.

/26

Table of Contents

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

GLPI is focused on cultivating a diverse and inclusive culture where our employees can freely bring diverse perspectives and varied experiences to the workplace. We value diverse representation, backgrounds and viewpoints and believe that they serve to strengthen our business proposition for the long-term horizon.

Within our hiring and recruitment processes, we adhere to equal employment policies, and we are committed to prioritizing diversity in any expansion of our Board of Directors or the filling of any vacancy. We abide by our Inclusive Workplace Policy and require all employees, including our Board of Directors, to complete an annual training on diversity and inclusion, alongside other trainings for various GLPI policies, including our Code of Business Conduct.

As of December 31, 2023, 50% of our employees identify as female.

Tenant Engagement

Since the formalization of our Tenant Partnership Program, we have continued to engage with our tenants, at least annually, but more frequently as deemed necessary, to address and discuss ESG related matters such as environmental data collection, sustainability strategies and community engagement opportunities. We are proud to report 100% tenant participation in response to our engagement efforts again in 2023. We continue to foster these relationships and identify community engagement partnership opportunities. We believe that aligning, sharing and committing to similar sustainability goals will continue to allow our Company and our tenant stakeholders to make a greater collective impact, while fostering long-term, successful relationships in the communities in which we own real estate and conduct business.

Community Engagement

We take an active role in supporting our communities by partnering with local and national organizations to administer charitable contributions, provide community service, and organize the donation of goods to assist local families in need. We endeavor to broaden our outreach and maximize our impact year over year. Our employees volunteer at food banks and participate in other charitable events. We completed our second Annual Day of Service to support the Berks County branch of Helping Harvest in fighting hunger. 89% of our employees participated in this initiative focused on helping our local community. The Company also contributed to the construction of a women's and children's shelter in Berks County, Pennsylvania and committed to a multi-year donation. The Company proudly further expanded its local community involvement efforts nationally partnering with certain tenants in those states where we own real estate. For example, in 2023, the Company partnered with its tenant to sponsor the St. Charles County Mayor's Charity Ball which benefited deserving charities in the St. Charles, Missouri area. Other notable partnerships and community outreach and involvement include Angel Tree, Trees for Troops, Salvation Army and Habitat for Humanity.

Available Information

For more information about us, visit our website at www.glpropinc.com. The contents of our website are not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our electronic filings with the SEC (including all annual reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-Q/A, and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports), including the exhibits, are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the SEC.

/27

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors Relating to Our Business

The majority of our revenues are dependent on PENN and its subsidiaries until we further diversify our portfolio. Any event that has a material adverse effect on PENN’s business, financial position or results of operations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

The majority of our revenue is based on the revenue derived under our master leases with subsidiaries of PENN. Because these master leases are triple-net leases, we depend on PENN to operate the properties that we own in a manner that generates revenues sufficient to allow PENN to meet its obligations to us, including payment of rent and all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses, and to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with its business. There can be no assurance that PENN will have sufficient assets, income or access to financing to enable it to satisfy its payment obligations to us under the master leases. The ability of PENN to fulfill its obligations depends, in part, upon the overall profitability of its gaming operations and, other than limited contractual protections afforded to us as a landlord, we have no control over PENN or its operations. The inability or unwillingness of PENN to meet its subsidiaries’ rent obligations and other obligations under the master leases may materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations, including our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Due to our dependence on rental payments from PENN as a significant source of revenue, we may be limited in our ability to enforce our rights under the master leases. Failure by PENN to comply with the terms of its master leases or to comply with the gaming regulations to which the leased properties are subject could require us to find another lessee for such leased property. In such event, we may be unable to locate a suitable lessee at similar rental rates or at all, which would have the effect of reducing our rental revenues. Likewise, our financial position may be materially weakened if PENN failed to renew or extend any master lease as such lease expires and we are unable to lease or re-lease our properties on economically favorable terms.

Any event that has a material adverse effect on PENN’s business, financial position or results of operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, continued consolidation in the gaming industry would increase our dependence on our existing tenants and could make it increasingly difficult for us to find alternative tenants for our properties.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of any of our tenants could result in termination of such tenant's lease and material losses to us.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of any of our tenants could diminish the income we receive from that tenant’s lease or leases. If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, federal law may prohibit us from evicting such tenant based solely upon such bankruptcy or insolvency. In addition, a bankrupt or insolvent tenant may be authorized to reject and terminate its lease or leases with us. Any claims against such bankrupt tenant for unpaid future rent would be subject to statutory limitations that would likely result in our receipt of rental revenues that are substantially less than the contractually specified rent we are owed under the lease or leases. In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent, if any, may not be paid in full. We may also be unable to re-lease a terminated or rejected space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms. Moreover, tenants who are considering filing for bankruptcy protection may request amendments of their master leases to remove certain of the properties they lease from us under such master leases. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to sell or re-lease such properties or that lease termination fees, if any, received in exchange for such releases will be sufficient to make up for the rental revenues lost as a result of such lease amendments.

Our pursuit of investments in, and acquisitions or development of, additional properties may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and face competition from other REITs (including other gaming-focused REITs), investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, lenders, gaming companies and other investors, some of whom are significantly larger and have greater resources and lower costs of capital. Increased competition may make it more challenging to identify and successfully capitalize on acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives. If we cannot identify and purchase a sufficient number of investment properties at favorable prices or if we are unable to finance acquisitions on commercially favorable terms, our business, financial position or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Additionally, the fact that we must distribute 90% of our net taxable income in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT may limit our ability to rely upon rental payments from our leased properties or subsequently acquired properties in order to finance acquisitions. As a result, if debt or equity financing is not available on acceptable terms, further acquisitions might be limited or curtailed and completing proposed acquisitions may be adversely

/28

Table of Contents

impacted. Furthermore, fluctuations in the price of our common stock may impact our ability to finance additional acquisitions through the issuance of common stock and/or cause significant dilution.

Investments in and acquisitions of gaming properties and other properties we might seek to acquire entail risks associated with real estate investments, including that the investment's performance will fail to meet expectations or that the tenant, operator or manager will underperform. Real estate development projects present other risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant development costs prior to completion of the project.

We are dependent on the gaming industry and may be susceptible to the risks associated with it, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

As the landlord of gaming facilities, we are impacted by the risks associated with the gaming industry. Therefore, our success is to some degree dependent on the gaming industry, which could be adversely affected by economic conditions in general, changes in consumer trends and preferences and other factors over which our tenants have no control. As we are subject to risks inherent in substantial investments in a single industry, a decrease in the gaming business may have a greater adverse effect on our revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio, particularly because a component of the rent under our leases is based, over time, on the revenue of the gaming facilities operated by our tenants. Decreases in discretionary consumer spending brought about by weakened general economic conditions such as, but not limited to, high unemployment levels, higher income taxes, low levels of consumer confidence, weakness in the housing market, cultural and demographic changes, and increased stock market volatility may negatively impact our revenues and operating cash flow.

The gaming industry is characterized by an increasing number of gaming facilities with an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming and other forms of gaming in the U.S. Furthermore, competition from alternative wagering products, such as internet lotteries, sweepstakes, social gaming products, daily fantasy sports and other internet wagering gaming services, online sports wagering or games of skill, which allow their customers a wagering alternative to the casino-style, such as remote home gaming or in non-casino settings, could divert customers from our properties and thus adversely affect our tenants and, indirectly, our business. Present state or federal laws that restrict the forms of gaming authorized or the number of competitors that offer gaming in the applicable jurisdiction are subject to change and may increase the competition affecting the business of our tenants and, indirectly, our business. Currently, there are proposals that would legalize several forms of internet gaming and other alternative wagering products in a number of states. Further, several states have already approved intrastate internet gaming and sports betting. Expansion of internet gaming and sports betting in other jurisdictions may compete with our traditional operations, which could have an adverse impact on our business and result of operations.

Certain of our tenants operate and manage facilities that are located in areas that experience extreme weather conditions and are more sensitive to the adverse effects of climate change.

The operations of our tenants in our leased facilities are subject to disruptions or reduced patronage as a result of severe weather conditions, changing climate conditions, natural disasters and other casualty events. Because many of our facilities are located on or adjacent to bodies of water, they are subject to risks in addition to those associated with land-based facilities, including loss of service due to casualty, forces of nature, mechanical failure, extended or extraordinary maintenance, flood, hurricane or other severe weather and climate conditions. A component of the rent under our leases is based, over time, on the revenues of the gaming facilities operated by PENN and Boyd on our properties; consequently, a casualty that leads to the loss of use of a casino facility subject to our leases for an extended period may negatively impact our revenues.

The Company cannot predict the impact that changing climate conditions will have on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Indirect weather-related impacts may affect the number of visitors to our tenants’ facilities in various ways, such as blocked access due to flooding, restricted access due to property damage, or decreased destination attractiveness of our tenants’ facilities. These facilities could be impacted by damage to their infrastructure or disruptions in their operations. The Company considers the potential impact of weather and climate change in acquiring properties and assessing portfolio risk.

We face extensive regulation from gaming and other regulatory authorities.

The ownership, operation, and management of gaming and racing facilities are subject to pervasive regulation. These regulations impact both GLPI and the operations of our gaming tenants. Many gaming and racing regulatory agencies in the jurisdictions in which our tenants operate require GLPI, its affiliates and certain officers and directors to maintain licenses as a key business entity, principal affiliate, business entity qualifier, operator, supplier or key person because of GLPI's status as landlord. For GLPI to maintain such licenses in good standing, certain of GLPI's officers and directors are also required to maintain licenses or a finding of suitability.

/29

Table of Contents

Many jurisdictions also require any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than a certain percentage of securities of a company licensed in such jurisdiction, typically 5%, to report the acquisition to gaming authorities, and gaming authorities may require such holders to apply for qualification or a finding of suitability, subject to limited exceptions for "institutional investors" that hold a company's voting securities for passive investment purposes only. Some jurisdictions may also limit the number of gaming licenses or gaming facilities in which a person may hold an ownership or a controlling interest. Subject to certain regulations and administrative proceeding requirements, the gaming regulators have the authority to deny any application or limit, condition, restrict, revoke or suspend any license, registration, finding of suitability or approval, or fine any person licensed, registered or found suitable or approved, for any cause deemed reasonable by the gaming authorities.

Additionally, substantially all material loans, significant acquisitions, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by us and our subsidiaries must be reported to and in some cases approved by gaming authorities in advance of the transaction. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries may make a public offering of securities without the prior approval of certain gaming authorities. Changes in control through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or otherwise are subject to receipt of prior approval of certain gaming authorities. Entities seeking to acquire control of GLPI or one of its subsidiaries must satisfy gaming authorities with respect to a variety of stringent licensing standards prior to assuming control.

Required regulatory approvals can delay or prohibit transfers of our gaming properties, which could result in periods in which we are unable to receive rent for such properties.

The tenants of our gaming properties are operators of gaming facilities and must be licensed under applicable state law. Prior to the transfer of gaming facilities, including a controlling interest, the new owner or operator generally must become licensed under applicable state law. In the event that any current lease or any future lease agreement we enter into is terminated or expires and a new tenant is found, any delays in the new tenant receiving regulatory approvals from the applicable state government agencies, or the inability to receive such approvals, may prolong the period during which we are unable to collect the applicable rent.

Our pursuit of strategic acquisitions unrelated to the gaming industry may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations.

We may pursue strategic acquisitions of real property assets unrelated to the gaming industry, including acquisitions that may be complementary to our existing gaming properties. Our management does not possess the same level of expertise with the dynamics and market conditions applicable to non-gaming assets, which could adversely affect the results of our expansion into other asset classes. In addition, we may be unable to achieve our desired return on our investments in new or adjacent asset classes.

COVID-19 has had, and may continue to have, a significant impact on our tenants' financial conditions and operations.

In December 2019, a new strain of novel coronavirus, COVID-19, was reported in China and shortly thereafter spread across the globe. This global pandemic outbreak led to unprecedented responses by federal, state and local officials. Certain responses included mandates from authorities requiring temporary closures of or imposed limitations on the operations of many businesses in the attempt to mitigate the spread of infections. Unemployment levels rose sharply and economic activity levels declined dramatically as a result. The United States government implemented various significant aid packages to support the economy and credit markets to combat these declines.

Our TRS Properties and our tenants' casino operations were forced to close temporarily in mid-March of 2020 through various dates into May and June 2020. Even though most of our properties recommenced operations to encouraging results, including certain locations where earnings were higher than the corresponding period prior to COVID-19, it is uncertain whether these strong results will continue in future periods.

Rent coverage ratios under our leases exceed that of pre-COVID-19 levels and business and social life have mostly returned to normal. However, the ultimate impact of COVID-19 and its variants on us is uncertain and subject to change and will depend on future developments, which cannot be accurately predicted, including the continued emergence of new strains of COVID-19, the effectiveness of vaccines and therapeutics over time against current and future strains of COVID-19, additional or modified government actions, new information that will emerge concerning the severity and impact of COVID-19 and the actions taken to contain COVID-19 or address its impact in the short and long term, among others.

Our charter restricts the ownership and transfer of our outstanding stock, which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or change of control of our company.

/30

Table of Contents

In order for us to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of stock may be owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year after the first year for which GLPI elected to qualify to be taxed as a REIT (2014). Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own GLPI stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year (other than the first taxable year for which GLPI elected to be taxed as a REIT). GLPI's charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes the Board of Directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve GLPI's qualification as a REIT. GLPI's charter also provides that, subject to certain exceptions approved by the Board of Directors, no person may beneficially or constructively own more than 7% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of GLPI's outstanding shares of all classes and series of stock. The constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause shares of stock owned directly or constructively by a group of related individuals or entities to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control of GLPI that might involve a premium price for shares of GLPI stock or otherwise be in the best interests of GLPI shareholders. The acquisition of less than 7% of our outstanding stock by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own beneficially or constructively in excess of 7% in value of our outstanding stock, and thus violate our charter's ownership limit. Our charter prohibits any person from owning shares of our stock that would result in our being "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our stock in violation of these restrictions may result in the transfer being automatically void. GLPI's charter also provides that shares of GLPI's capital stock acquired or held in excess of the ownership limit will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and that any person who acquires shares of GLPI's capital stock in violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the market price on the day the shares were transferred to the trust or the amount realized from the sale. GLPI or its designee will have the right to purchase the shares from the trustee at this calculated price as well. A transfer of shares of GLPI's capital stock in violation of the limit may be void under certain circumstances. GLPI's 7% ownership limitation may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of GLPI, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for GLPI's shareholders. To assist GLPI in complying with applicable gaming laws, our charter also provides that capital stock of GLPI that is owned or controlled by an unsuitable person or an affiliate of an unsuitable person will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and that any such unsuitable person or affiliate will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the price paid by the unsuitable person or affiliate for the shares or the amount realized from the sale, in each case less a discount in a percentage (up to 100%) to be determined by our Board of Directors in its sole and absolute discretion. The shares shall additionally be redeemable by GLPI, out of funds legally available for that redemption, to the extent required by the gaming authorities making the determination of unsuitability or to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable by our Board of Directors, at a redemption price equal to the lesser of (i) the market price on the date of the redemption notice, (ii) the market price on the redemption date, or (iii) the actual amount paid for the shares by the owner thereof, in each case less a discount in a percentage (up to 100%) to be determined by our Board of Directors in its sole and absolute discretion.

Pennsylvania law and provisions in our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent takeover attempts by third parties and therefore inhibit our shareholders from realizing a premium on their stock.

Our charter and bylaws, in addition to Pennsylvania law, contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. Our charter and bylaws, among other things (i) permit the Board of Directors, without further action of the shareholders, to issue and fix the terms of preferred stock, which may have rights senior to those of the common stock; (ii) establish certain advance notice procedures for shareholder proposals, and require all director candidates to be recommended by the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board of Directors following the affirmative determination by the nominating and corporate governance committee that such nominee is likely to meet the applicable suitability requirements of any federal, state or local regulatory body having jurisdiction over us; (iii) provide that a director may only be removed by shareholders for cause and upon the vote of 75% of the shares entitled to vote; (iv) require shareholders or shareholder groups to own 3% or more of our outstanding common stock in order to recommend a person for direct nomination for election to the Board of Directors and inclusion in our proxy materials; (v) require shareholders to have beneficially owned at least 1% of our outstanding common stock in order to recommend a person for nomination for election to the Board of Directors, or to present a shareholder proposal, for action at a shareholders' meeting; and (vi) provide for super majority approval requirements for amending or repealing certain provisions in our charter and in order to approve an amendment or repeal of any provision of our bylaws that has not been proposed by our Board of Directors.

In addition, specific anti-takeover provisions in Pennsylvania law could make it more difficult for a third party to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions require (i) approval of certain transactions by a majority of the voting stock other than that held by the potential acquirer; (ii) the acquisition at "fair value" of all the outstanding shares not held by an acquirer of 20% or more; (iii) a five-year moratorium on certain "business combination" transactions with an "interested shareholder;" (iv) the loss by interested shareholders of their voting rights over "control shares;" (v) the disgorgement of profits

/31

Table of Contents

realized by an interested shareholder from certain dispositions of our shares; and (vi) severance payments for certain employees and prohibiting termination of certain labor contracts.

We believe these provisions will protect our shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors and by providing our Board of Directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make GLPI immune from takeovers or to prevent a transaction from occurring. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our Board of Directors determines is not in the best interests of GLPI. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

We may experience uninsured or under insured losses, which could result in a significant loss of the capital we have invested in a property, decrease anticipated future revenues or cause us to incur unanticipated expense.

While our leases require, and new lease agreements are expected to require, that comprehensive insurance and hazard insurance be maintained by the tenants, a tenant's failure to comply could lead to an uninsured or under insured loss and there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover such uninsured or under insured amounts from such tenant. Further, there are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods, that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Insurance coverage may not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of a loss. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to replace the property after such property has been damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds received might not be adequate to restore the economic position with respect to such property.

If we or one of our tenants experience a loss that is uninsured, or that exceeds our or our tenant's policy coverage limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties were subject to recourse indebtedness, we could continue to be liable for the indebtedness even if these properties were irreparably damaged.

In addition, even if damage to our properties is covered by insurance, a disruption of our or our tenant's business caused by a casualty event may result in the loss of business or tenants. The business interruption insurance our tenants carry may not fully compensate us for the loss of business of our tenants due to an interruption caused by a casualty event.

A disruption in the financial markets may make it more difficult to evaluate the stability, net assets and capitalization of insurance companies and any insurer's ability to meet its claim payment obligations. A failure of an insurance company to make payments to us or our tenants upon an event of loss covered by an insurance policy could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, and holders of our common stock could lose a significant portion of their investment if the market price of our common stock declines.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, and shareholders may not be able to resell their shares of our common stock at or above the price at which they acquired the common stock due to fluctuations in its market price, including changes in price caused by factors unrelated to our performance or prospects.

Specific factors that may have a significant effect on the market price for our common stock include, among others, the following:

•changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings estimates regarding our common stock or other comparable REITs;

•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue stream or future prospects;

•strategic actions taken by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions;

•our failure to close pending acquisitions;

•our failure to achieve the perceived benefits of our acquisitions, including financial results, as rapidly as or to the extent anticipated by financial or industry analysts;

/32

Table of Contents

•new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business and operations or the gaming industry;

•changes in tax or accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

•changes in the interest rate environment and/or the impact of rising inflation;

•adverse conditions in the financial markets or general U.S. or international economic conditions, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism and responses to such events; and

•sales of our common stock by members of our management team or other significant shareholders.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with real estate properties owned by us may materially impair the value of those investments.

As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. Although we do not operate or manage most of our properties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there has been a release or threatened release of a regulated material as well as other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release.

In addition to these costs, which are typically not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property's value, we could be liable for certain other costs, including governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Further, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and the costs the government incurs in connection with such contamination.

Although we require our operators and tenants to undertake to indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, including environmental liabilities they cause, the amount of such liabilities could exceed the financial ability of the tenant or operator to indemnify us. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral.

Changes to U.S. federal income tax laws could materially and adversely affect us and our shareholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made significant changes to the federal income taxation of individuals and corporations under the Code, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. In addition to reducing corporate and individual income tax rates, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates or restricts various deductions that, along with other provisions, may change the way that we calculate our REIT taxable income and our TRS’s taxable income. Significant provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that investors should be aware of include provisions that: (i) lower the corporate income tax rate to 21%, (ii) provide noncorporate taxpayers with a deduction of up to 20% of certain income earned through partnerships and REITs, (iii) limit the net operating loss deduction to 80% of taxable income, where taxable income is determined without regard to the net operating loss deduction itself, generally eliminate net operating loss carry backs and allow unused net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely, (iv) expand the ability of businesses to deduct the cost of certain property investments in the year in which the property is purchased, (v) generally lower tax rates for individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers, while limiting deductions such as miscellaneous itemized deductions and state and local tax deductions, and (vi) limit the deduction for net interest expense incurred by a business to 30% of the "adjusted taxable income" of the taxpayer, but do not apply to certain small-business taxpayers or electing real property trades or businesses, including REITs. The effect of these, and the many other, changes made is highly uncertain, both in terms of their direct effect on the taxation of holders of our common stock and their indirect effect on the value of our assets or market conditions generally. In addition, future changes in tax laws, including the proposed tax agenda presented by the Biden administration, or tax rulings, could affect our effective tax rate, the tax rate of shareholders of our stock, and overall benefit of maintaining our status as a REIT. For example, the reduction in the corporate income tax rate resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could be reduced or rescinded, individual tax rates may increase, and the §199A deduction for REIT dividends could be phased out.

We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.

We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber

/33

Table of Contents

terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems; result in misstated financial reports, violations of loan covenants and/or missed reporting deadlines; result in our inability to monitor our compliance with the rules and regulations regarding our qualification as a REIT; result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against us or for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes; require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result; subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, penalties or termination of certain agreements; or damage our reputation among our tenants and investors generally.

If our tenants fail to detect fraud or theft, including by our tenants’ users and employees, our tenants, and, therefore, our reputation may suffer which could harm our tenants, and, therefore, our brand and reputation and negatively impact our tenants, and therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operations and can subject us to investigations and litigation.

Our tenants may incur losses from various types of financial fraud, including use of stolen or fraudulent credit card data, claims of unauthorized payments by a user and attempted payments by users with insufficient funds. Bad actors use increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities involving personal information, such as unauthorized use of another person’s identity, account information or payment information and unauthorized acquisition or use of credit or debit card details, bank account information and mobile phone numbers and accounts. Under current credit card practices, our tenants may be liable for use of funds on their products with fraudulent credit card data, even if the associated financial institution approved the credit card transaction. Acts of fraud may involve various tactics, including collusion. Successful exploitation of our tenants' systems could have negative effects on their product offerings, services and user experience and could harm their reputation. Failure to discover such acts or schemes in a timely manner could result in harm to their operations. In addition, negative publicity related to such schemes could have an adverse effect on their reputation, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We cannot guarantee that any of our tenants’ measures to detect and reduce the occurrence of fraudulent or other malicious activity on our offerings will be effective or will scale efficiently with our tenants business. Our tenants’ failure to adequately detect or prevent fraudulent transactions could harm our tenants’, and, therefore, our reputation or brand, result in litigation or regulatory action and lead to expenses that could adversely affect our tenants, and, therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risk Factors Relating to our Status as a REIT

If we do not qualify to be taxed as a REIT, or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We elected on our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return to be treated as a REIT and intend to continue to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT. We currently operate, and intend to continue to operate, in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We received an opinion from our special tax advisors, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and KPMG LLP (collectively the "Special Tax Advisors"), with respect to our qualification as a REIT in connection with the Spin-Off. Opinions of advisors are not binding on the IRS or any court. The opinions of the Special Tax Advisors represent only the view of the Special Tax Advisors based on their review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations relating to the values of our assets and the sources of our income. The opinions are expressed as of the date issued. The Special Tax Advisors have no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed or of any subsequent change in applicable law. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinions of Special Tax Advisors and our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis, the results of which are not monitored by the Special Tax Advisors. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals.

PENN has received a private letter ruling from the IRS with respect to certain issues relevant to our qualification as a REIT. In general, the ruling provides, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein, that (1) certain of the assets to be held by us after the Spin-Off and (2) the methodology for calculating a certain portion of rent received by us pursuant to the

/34

Table of Contents

PENN Master Lease will not adversely affect our qualification as a REIT. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge our qualification as a REIT on the basis of other issues or facts outside the scope of the ruling.

If we were to fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and dividends paid to our shareholders would not be deductible by us in computing our taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders, which in turn could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code and violations of these provisions could jeopardize our REIT qualifications.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Our qualification as a REIT depends on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify to be taxed as a REIT may depend in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence.

We could fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT if income we receive from our tenants, or their subsidiaries, is not treated as qualifying income.

Under applicable provisions of the Code, we will not be treated as a REIT unless we satisfy various requirements, including requirements relating to the sources of our gross income. Rents received or accrued by us from our tenants or their subsidiaries, will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of these requirements if our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and are instead treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangements. If any leases are not respected as a true lease for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. Furthermore, our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals.

In addition, subject to certain exceptions, rents received or accrued by us from our tenants will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of these requirements if we or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of our stock actually or constructively owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of such respective tenant's stock entitled to vote or 10% or more of the total value of such respective tenant's stock. Our charter provides for restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares of stock, including restrictions on such ownership or transfer that would cause the rents received or accrued by us from our tenants, to be treated as non-qualifying rent for purposes of the REIT gross income requirements. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that such restrictions will be effective in ensuring that rents received or accrued by us from our tenants or their subsidiaries will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of REIT qualification requirements.

Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to income from "qualified dividends" payable by U.S. corporations to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is currently 20%. Ordinary dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. However, for taxable years that begin after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026: (i) the U.S. federal income tax brackets generally applicable to ordinary income of individuals, trusts and estates have been modified (with the rates generally reduced) and (ii) shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates are generally entitled to a deduction equal to 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary income dividends received from a REIT (not including dividends that are eligible for the reduced rates applicable to "qualified dividend income" or treated as capital gain dividends), subject to certain limitations.

The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts or estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our stock, even taking into account the lower 37% maximum rate for ordinary income and the 20% deduction for ordinary REIT dividends received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026.

/35

Table of Contents

REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.

We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, in order to qualify to be taxed as a REIT (assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied) so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code and to avoid the imposition of corporate income tax or the 4% excise tax.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, or pay dividends in the form of taxable in-kind distributions of property, including potentially, shares of our common stock, to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our stock. Restrictions on our indebtedness, including restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make certain distributions, could preclude us from meeting the 90% distribution requirement. Decreases in funds from operations due to unfinanced expenditures for acquisitions of properties or increases in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding without commensurate increases in funds from operations each would adversely affect our ability to maintain distributions to our shareholders. Moreover, the failure of PENN to make rental payments under its leases would materially impair our ability to make distributions. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to make distributions at the anticipated distribution rate or any other rate.

Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

Even if we remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. For example, we may hold certain of our assets and conduct related activities through TRS subsidiary corporations that are subject to federal, state, and local corporate-level income taxes as regular C corporations as well as state and local gaming taxes. In addition, we may incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS if they are not conducted on an arm's-length basis. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, government securities and "real estate assets" (as defined in the Code), including certain mortgage loans and securities. The remainder of our investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. Lastly, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by unsecured debt of publicly traded REITs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate or forego otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.

In addition to the asset tests set forth above, to qualify to be taxed as a REIT we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the amounts we distribute to shareholders and the ownership of our stock. We may be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source-of-income or asset-diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make certain attractive investments.

/36

Table of Contents

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.

The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Income from certain hedging transactions that we may enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or from transactions to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that satisfy the REIT gross income tests (including gain from the termination of such a transaction) does not constitute "gross income" for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests that apply to REITs, provided that certain identification requirements are met. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions or fail to properly identify such transactions as a hedge, the income is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may be required to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because the TRS may be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in the TRS will generally not provide any tax benefit, except that such losses could theoretically be carried back or forward against past or future taxable income in the TRS.

Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

We may have future capital needs and may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.

As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $6.6 billion in long-term indebtedness, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts, consisting of:

•$6,075.0 million of outstanding senior unsecured notes;

•$600.0 million of term loans, and

•approximately $0.4 million of finance lease liabilities related to certain assets.

We may incur additional indebtedness in the future to refinance our existing indebtedness or to finance newly-acquired properties. Any significant additional indebtedness could require a substantial portion of our cash flow to make interest and principal payments due on our indebtedness. Greater demands on our cash resources may reduce funds available to us to pay dividends, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, or carry out other aspects of our business strategy. Increased indebtedness may also limit our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions, make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions and create competitive disadvantages for us compared to other companies with relatively lower debt levels and/or borrowing costs. Increased future debt service obligations may limit our operational flexibility, including our ability to acquire properties, finance or refinance our properties, contribute properties to joint ventures or sell properties as needed. If we incur additional indebtedness or such other obligations, the risks associated with our leverage, including our possible inability to service our debt, may increase.

We may be unable to obtain additional financing or financing on favorable terms or our operating cash flow may be insufficient to satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time (if any). If financing is not available when needed, or is available on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to develop new or enhance our existing properties, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have a material amount of indebtedness which could have significant effects on our business including the following:

•it may limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements and general corporate or other purposes;

•a material portion of our cash flows will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, and will not be available for other purposes, including to make acquisitions;

•it could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or are less leveraged;

•it could make us more vulnerable to downturns in general economic or industry conditions or in our business, or prevent us from carrying out activities that are important to our growth;

/37

Table of Contents

•it could increase our interest expense if interest rates in general increase because our indebtedness under the Amended Credit Facility bears interest at floating rates;

•it could limit our ability to take advantage of strategic business opportunities;

•it could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness. Any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness under the Amended Credit Facility and other outstanding debt obligations; and

•it could impact our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our Amended Credit Facility or from other debt financing, in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt service obligations, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness, selling assets or seeking to raise additional capital, including by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities. Our ability to restructure or refinance our indebtedness or access new indebtedness will depend on the capital and credit markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt service requirements or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms may have an adverse effect, which could be material to our business, financial position or results of operations.

Our shareholders may be subject to significant dilution caused by the additional issuance of equity securities.

If and when additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, including under our "at the market" offering program relating to our common stock or in connection with future acquisitions, our shareholders may experience significant dilution. Additionally, sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, make it more difficult for our shareholders to sell their GLPI common stock at a time and price that they deem appropriate and impair our future ability to raise capital through an offering of our equity securities.

Adverse changes in our credit rating may affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.

Our outstanding debt is periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based upon our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to both our industry and the economic outlook. Our credit rating may affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Because we rely in part on debt financing to fund growth, the absence of an investment grade credit rating or any credit rating downgrade may have a negative effect on our future growth.

If we cannot obtain additional capital, our growth may be limited.

As described above, in order to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT each year, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our shareholders. As a result, our retained earnings available to fund acquisitions, development, or other capital expenditures are nominal, and we rely upon the availability of additional debt or equity capital to fund these activities. Our long-term ability to grow through acquisitions or development, which is an important component of our strategy, may be limited if we cannot obtain additional debt financing or raise equity capital. Market conditions may make it difficult to obtain debt financing or raise equity capital, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing or that we will be able to obtain such capital on favorable terms.

An increase in market interest rates could increase our interest costs on existing and future debt and could adversely affect our stock price.

If interest rates increase, so could our interest costs for any new debt and our variable rate debt obligations. This increased cost could make the financing of any acquisition more costly, as well as lower our current period earnings. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the access third parties have to credit, thereby decreasing the amount they are willing to pay for our assets and consequently limiting our ability to reposition our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

/38

Table of Contents

Further, the dividend yield on our common stock, as a percentage of the price of such common stock, may influence the price of such common stock. Thus, an increase in market interest rates may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend yield, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The majority of our debt is at fixed rates and our exposure to variable interest rates is currently limited to outstanding obligations, if any, under our $1.75 billion revolving credit facility (the "Initial Revolving Credit Facility") and our Term Loan Credit Facility. These debt instruments are indexed to a Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"). Our total variable rate debt approximated 9% of our total debt at December 31, 2023.

Covenants in our debt agreements may limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach or default could materially adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain customary covenants, including restrictions on our ability to grant liens on our assets, incur indebtedness, sell assets, make investments, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations and pay certain dividends and other restricted payments. Specifically, our debt agreements contain the following financial covenants: a maximum total debt to total asset value ratio of 60% (subject to increase to 65% for specified periods in connection with certain acquisitions), a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1, a maximum senior secured debt to total asset value ratio of 40% and a maximum unsecured debt to unencumbered asset value ratio of 60%. These restrictions may limit our operational flexibility. Covenants that limit our operational flexibility as well as defaults under our debt instruments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Risk Factors Relating to Our Acquisition of Pinnacle and Tropicana's Gaming Properties

Our recourse against Tropicana, including for any breaches under the Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement or the Tropicana Merger Agreement, is limited.

As is customary for a public company target in a merger and acquisition transaction, Tropicana has no obligation to indemnify us or Caesars for any breaches of its representations and warranties or covenants included in the Tropicana Merger Agreement and the Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement, or for any pre-closing liabilities or claims. While we have certain arrangements in place with Caesars in connection with certain limited pre-closing liabilities, if any issues arise post-closing (other than as provided for in the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease), we may not be entitled to sufficient, or any, indemnification or recourse from Tropicana or Caesars, which could have a materially adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

PENN has contractual obligations to indemnify us for certain liabilities, including liabilities as successor in interest to Pinnacle. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that PENN's ability to satisfy its and Pinnacle's indemnification obligations will not be impaired in the future.

PENN has contractual obligations to indemnify us for certain liabilities, including liabilities as successor in interest to Pinnacle. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that PENN and Pinnacle agreed to retain, and there can be no assurance that PENN will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from PENN any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from PENN and such recovery could have a material adverse impact on PENN's financial condition and ability to pay rent due under the PENN 2023 Master Lease, the Amended PENN Master Lease and/or the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

The Company maintains a cyber risk program as a part of its enterprise risk management program that is designed to identify, assess, mitigate and manage cyber risks. The Company’s Vice President of Information Technology is responsible for managing the Company’s cyber risk program, informing senior management regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents and supervising third parties assisting in these efforts. The Company's Vice President of Information Technology has two decades of experience in the Information Technology industry, with a strong emphasis on cybersecurity whose professional experience is distinguished by a Bachelor's degree in Network Operation and

/39

Table of Contents

Security and enriched by practical, hands on experience in the field. The Vice President's long standing career in Information Technology reflects a deep seated expertise in safeguarding digital infrastructures in today's dynamic cyber environment.

The Company has policies and procedures concerning cybersecurity matters, which include policies that directly or indirectly relate to cybersecurity, such as policies related to encryption standards, antivirus protection, remote access, multifactor authentication, confidential information and the use of the internet, social media, email and wireless devices. All Company employees are required to complete annual cybersecurity training programs.

The Company engages third party vendors to periodically test, monitor and maintain the performance and effectiveness of the Company’s cyber risk program. In addition, in 2023 the Company participated in a comprehensive third-party cyber risk review as part of its annual insurance renewal process and consideration of cyber risk coverage.

The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risk program and the process employed to monitor and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Members of the management team provide periodic updates to the Audit and Compliance Committee on the status of the Company’s cyber risk management program. In addition, cybersecurity risks are reviewed by the Board of Directors as part of the Company’s ongoing enterprise risk management program.

As a triple net REIT with no significant consumer facing infrastructure or exposure, the Company faces a limited number of cybersecurity risks in connection with the operation of the business. Risks from cybersecurity threats have not materially affected the Company to date and are not reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, including the Company's business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Other than widespread threats generally affecting businesses, the Company has not experienced threats to or breaches of its data or systems, including malware and computer virus attacks. For more information about the cybersecurity risks faced by the Company, see the risk factor entitled “We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems” in Item 1A- Risk Factors.

/40

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Rental Properties

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 61 rental properties, consisting of the real property associated with 34 gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with 6 gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars, the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Boyd, the real property associated with 3 gaming and related facilities operated by the Cordish Companies, the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Casino Queen, 9 gaming and related facilities operated by Bally's and 1 gaming facility under construction that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock. All rental properties are subject to long-term triple-net leases. For additional information pertaining to our tenant leases and our rental properties see Item 1.

Corporate Office

The Company's corporate headquarters building is located in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania and is owned by the Company.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to various legal and administrative proceedings relating to personal injuries, employment matters, commercial transactions and other matters arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the financial outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Company maintains what it believes is adequate insurance coverage to further mitigate the risks of such proceedings and requires its tenants to carry insurance and defend and indemnify the Company from and against any claims or liabilities. However, such proceedings can be costly, time consuming and unpredictable and, therefore, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of such proceedings may not materially impact the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Further, no assurance can be given that the amount or scope of existing insurance coverage carried by the Company or its tenants will be sufficient to cover losses arising from such matters.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

/41

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "GLPI." As of February 14, 2024, there were approximately 687 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

The Company's annual dividend is greater than or equal to at least 90% of its REIT taxable income on an annual basis, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pays tax at regular corporate rates on any undistributed income to the extent that it distributes less than 100% of its taxable income in any tax year.

Cash available for distribution to GLPI shareholders is derived from income from real estate. All distributions will be made by GLPI at the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend on the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, capital requirements, debt covenants, applicable laws and other factors as the Board of Directors of GLPI deems relevant. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on dividends.

ITEM 6. RESERVED

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Operations

GLPI is a self-administered and self-managed Pennsylvania REIT. The Company was formed from the 2013 tax-free spin-off of the real estate assets of PENN and was incorporated in Pennsylvania on February 13, 2013, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PENN. On November 1, 2013, PENN contributed to GLPI, through a series of internal corporate restructurings, substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with PENN's real property interests and real estate development business, as well as the assets and liabilities of the TRS Properties and then spun-off GLPI to holders of PENN's common and preferred stock in the Spin-Off. The assets and liabilities of GLPI were recorded at their respective historical carrying values at the time of the Spin-Off.

The Company elected on its U.S. federal income tax return for its taxable year that began on January 1, 2014 to be treated as a REIT and the Company, together with its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, GLP Holdings, Inc., jointly elected to treat each of GLP Holdings, Inc., Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge) and Penn Cecil Maryland, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Perryville) as a TRS effective on the first day of the first taxable year of GLPI as a REIT. In connection with the Spin-Off, PENN allocated its accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) for periods prior to the consummation of the Spin-Off between PENN and GLPI. In connection with its election to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, GLPI declared a special dividend to its shareholders to distribute any accumulated earnings and profits relating to the real property assets and attributable to any pre-REIT years, including any earnings and profits allocated to GLPI in connection with the Spin-Off, to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements.

On July 1, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville to PENN and leased the real estate to PENN pursuant to a standalone lease. On December 17, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge to Casino Queen and leased the real estate to Casino Queen pursuant to the Casino Queen Master Lease as described below. On December 17, 2021, GLPI declared a special dividend to the Company's shareholders to distribute the accumulated earnings and profits attributable to these sales. In 2021, subsequent to the sale of the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge, GLP Holdings, Inc. was merged into GLP Capital.

During 2020, the Company and Tropicana LV, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that at the time held the real estate of the Tropicana Las Vegas, elected to treat Tropicana LV, LLC as a TRS. In September 2022, Bally's acquired both the building assets from GLPI and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas. GLPI retained ownership of the land and entered into a ground lease with Bally's. In connection with this transaction, Tropicana LV, LLC was merged

/42

Table of Contents

into GLP Capital. GLPI paid a special earnings and profit dividend of $0.25 per share in the first quarter of 2023 related to the sale of the building to Bally's.

In connection with the UPREIT Transaction with Cordish, GLP Capital issued 7,366,683 newly-issued OP Units to affiliates of Cordish. OP Units are exchangeable for common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain terms and conditions. Such issuance of OP Units to Cordish in exchange for its contribution of certain real property assets resulted in GLP Capital becoming treated as a partnership for income tax purposes, with GLPI being deemed to contribute substantially all of the assets and liabilities of GLP Capital in exchange for the general partnership and a majority of the limited partnership interests, and a minority limited partnership interest being owned by Cordish. In advance of the UPREIT Transaction, the Company, together with GLP Financing II, Inc. jointly elected for GLP Financing II, Inc. to be treated as a TRS effective December 23, 2021. On January 3, 2023, the Company issued 286,643 OP Units to affiliates of Bally's in connection with its acquisition of Bally's Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton. There were 7,653,326 OP Units outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

GLPI's primary business consists of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements. As of December 31, 2023, GLPI's portfolio consisted of interests in 61 gaming and related facilities, which was comprised of the real property associated with 34 gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with 6 gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars, the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Boyd, the real property associated with 9 gaming and related facilities operated by Bally's, the real property associated with 3 gaming and related facilities operated by Cordish and the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Casino Queen and 1 gaming facility under construction that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock. These facilities, including our corporate headquarters building, are geographically diversified across 18 states and contain approximately 28.7 million square feet. As of December 31, 2023, our properties were 100% occupied. We expect to continue growing our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional gaming facilities to lease to gaming operators under prudent terms.

PENN 2023 Master Lease and Amended PENN Master Lease

As a result of the Spin-Off, GLPI owns substantially all of PENN’s former real property assets (as of the consummation of the Spin-Off) and leases back most of those assets to PENN for use by its subsidiaries pursuant to the Original PENN Master Lease. The Original PENN Master Lease was a triple-net operating lease, the term of which was scheduled to expire on October 31, 2033, with no purchase option, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

On October 10, 2022, the Company announced that it agreed to create the PENN 2023 Master Lease for seven of PENN's properties. The companies also agreed to a funding mechanism to support PENN's pursuit of relocation and development opportunities at several of the properties included in the new master lease. The PENN 2023 Master Lease became effective on January 1, 2023.

Pursuant to this agreement, the Amended PENN Master Lease was also created to remove PENN's properties in Aurora and Joliet, Illinois; Columbus and Toledo, Ohio; and Henderson, Nevada. The properties removed from the Original Penn Master Lease were added to the PENN 2023 Master Lease. In addition, the Meadows Lease and the Perryville Lease were terminated and these properties were transferred into the PENN 2023 Master Lease. Both the Amended PENN Master Lease and the PENN 2023 Master Lease are triple-net operating leases, the terms of which expire on October 31, 2033, with no purchase options, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

The terms of the PENN 2023 Master Lease and the Amended PENN Master Lease are substantially similar to the Original PENN Master Lease with the following key differences:

•The PENN 2023 Master Lease is cross-defaulted and co-terminus with the Amended PENN Master Lease.

•The rent for the PENN 2023 Master Lease is $232.2 million in base rent with fixed annual escalation of 1.50%, with the first escalation occurring on November 1, 2023.

/43

Table of Contents

•The rent for the Amended 2023 PENN Master Lease was adjusted to $284.1 million, consisting of $208.2 million of building base rent, $43.0 million of land base rent, and $32.9 million of percentage rent.

Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, Boyd Master Lease and Belterra Park Lease

In April 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the real estate assets of Pinnacle for approximately $4.8 billion. GLPI originally leased these assets back to Pinnacle, under the Pinnacle Master Lease, the term of which expires on April 30, 2031, with no purchase option, followed by four remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. On October 15, 2018, the Company completed the previously announced PENN-Pinnacle Merger to accommodate PENN's acquisition of the majority of Pinnacle's operations, pursuant to a definitive agreement and plan of merger between PENN and Pinnacle, dated December 17, 2017. Concurrent with the PENN-Pinnacle Merger, the Company amended the Pinnacle Master Lease to allow for the sale of the operating assets of Ameristar Casino Hotel Kansas City, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles and Belterra Casino Resort from Pinnacle to Boyd and entered into the Boyd Master Lease for these properties on terms similar to the Company’s Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Boyd Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years (from the original April 2016 commencement date of the Pinnacle Master Lease and expiring April 30, 2026), with no purchase option, followed by five 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. The Company also purchased the real estate assets of Plainridge Park from PENN for $250.0 million, exclusive of transaction fees and taxes and added this property to the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Amended Pinnacle Master Lease was assumed by PENN at the consummation of the PENN-Pinnacle Merger. The Company also entered into the Belterra Park Loan with Boyd in connection with Boyd's acquisition of Belterra Park. In May 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Belterra Park in satisfaction of the Belterra Park Loan, subject to the Belterra Park Lease with a Boyd affiliate operating the property. The Belterra Park Lease rent terms are consistent with the Boyd Master Lease. The annual rent is comprised of a fixed component, part of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities which is adjusted, subject to certain floors, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of Belterra Park during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease

On October 1, 2018, the Company closed its previously announced transaction to acquire certain real property assets from Tropicana and certain of its affiliates pursuant to the Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Real Estate Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired the real estate assets of Tropicana Atlantic City, Tropicana Evansville, Tropicana Laughlin, Trop Casino Greenville and the Belle of Baton Rouge from Tropicana for an aggregate cash purchase price of $964.0 million, exclusive of transaction fees and taxes. Concurrent with the Tropicana Acquisition, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (now doing business as Caesars) acquired the operating assets of these properties from Tropicana pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 15, 2018 by and among Tropicana, GLP Capital, Caesars and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caesars and leased the GLP Assets from the Company pursuant to the terms of the Caesars Master Lease.

On June 15, 2020, the Company entered into the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease to, (i) extend the initial term of 15 years to 20 years, with renewals of up to an additional 20 years at the option of Caesars, (ii) remove the variable rent component in its entirety commencing with the third lease year, (iii) in the third lease year, increase annual land base rent and annual building base rent, (iv) provide fixed escalation percentages that delay the escalation of building base rent until the commencement of the fifth lease year with building base rent increasing annually by 1.25% in the fifth and sixth lease years, 1.75% in the seventh and eighth lease years and 2% in the ninth lease year and each lease year thereafter, (v) subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, permit Caesars to elect to replace the Tropicana Evansville and/or Trop Casino Greenville properties under the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease with one or more of Caesars Gaming Scioto Downs, The Row in Reno, Isle Casino Racing Pompano Park, Isle Casino Hotel – Black Hawk, Lady Luck Casino – Black Hawk, Waterloo, Bettendorf or Isle of Capri Casino Boonville, provided that the aggregate value of such new property, individually or collectively, is at least equal to the value of Tropicana Evansville or Trop Casino Greenville, as applicable, (vi) permit Caesars to elect to sell its interest in Belle of Baton Rouge and sever it from the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease (with no change to the rent obligation to the Company), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, and (vii) provide certain relief under the operating, capital expenditure and financial covenants thereunder in the event of facility closures due to pandemics, governmental restrictions and certain other instances of unavoidable delay. The effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease was subject to the review of certain gaming regulatory agencies and the expiration of applicable gaming regulatory advance notice periods which were received on July 23, 2020.

/44

Table of Contents

On December 18, 2020, the Company and Caesars entered into the Second Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease in connection with the completion of the Exchange Agreement with subsidiaries of Caesars in which Caesars transferred to the Company the real estate assets of Waterloo and Bettendorf in exchange for the transfer by the Company to Caesars of the real property assets of Tropicana Evansville, plus a cash payment of $5.7 million. In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the annual building base rent and the annual land component were increased.

On November 13, 2023, the Company and Caesars entered into the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease in connection with Caesars selling its interest in the Belle of Baton Rouge to Casino Queen with no change in rent obligation to the Company. See Note 12 for further discussion.

Horseshoe St. Louis Lease

On October 1, 2018 the Company entered into a loan agreement with Caesars in connection with Caesars’s acquisition of Horseshoe St. Louis, whereby the Company extended funds to Caesars under the CZR loan. On the one-year anniversary of the CZR loan, the mortgage evidenced by a deed of trust on the Horseshoe St. Louis property terminated and the loan became unsecured. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from the Missouri Gaming Commission to own the real estate assets of Horseshoe St. Louis property in satisfaction of the CZR loan. On September 29, 2020, the transaction closed and we entered into the Horseshoe St. Louis Lease, the initial term of which expires on October 31, 2033 with four separate renewal options of five years each, exercisable at the tenant's option. The Horseshoe St. Louis Lease rent terms were adjusted on December 1, 2021 such that the annual escalator is now fixed at 1.25% for the second through fifth lease years, increasing to 1.75% for the sixth and seventh lease years and thereafter increasing by 2.0% for the remainder of the lease.

Bally's Master Lease

On June 3, 2021, the Company completed its previously announced transaction pursuant to which a subsidiary of Bally's acquired 100% of the equity interests in the Caesars subsidiary that currently operates Tropicana Evansville and the Company reacquired the real property assets of Tropicana Evansville from Caesars for a cash purchase price of approximately $340.0 million. In addition, the Company purchased the real estate assets of Dover Downs Hotel & Casino (now Bally's Dover Casino Resort) from Bally's for a cash purchase price of approximately $144.0 million. The real estate assets of these two facilities were added to the Bally's Master Lease which has an initial term of 15 years, with no purchase option, followed by four five-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. Rent under the Bally's Master Lease is subject to contractual escalations based on the CPI, with a 1% floor and a 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI meeting a 0.5% threshold.

On April 1, 2022 and January 3, 2023, the Company completed the acquisitions of real estate assets of Bally's Biloxi, Bally's Tiverton, Bally's Black Hawk, and Bally's Quad Cities. These properties were added to the existing Bally's Master Lease with annual rent increases that are subject to the escalation clauses described above.

In connection with GLPI’s commitment to consummate the Bally’s Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton acquisitions, a deposit of $200.0 million funded by GLPI in September 2022 was returned to the Company along with a $9.0 million transaction fee that was recorded against the purchase price of the assets acquired. Concurrent with the closing, GLPI borrowed $600 million under its previously structured delayed draw term loan. The Company continues to have the option, subject to receipt by Bally's of required consents, to acquire the real property assets of Bally's Twin River Lincoln Casino Resort prior to December 31, 2026 for a purchase price of $771.0 million and additional rent of $58.8 million.

Tropicana Las Vegas

On April 16, 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries closed on its previously announced transaction to acquire the real property associated with the Tropicana Las Vegas from PENN in exchange for rent credits of $307.5 million, which were applied against future rent obligations due under the parties' existing leases during 2020.

On September 26, 2022, Bally’s acquired both GLPI’s building assets and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas for an aggregate cash acquisition price, net of fees and expenses, of approximately $145 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $67.4 million, $52.8 million after-tax. GLPI retained ownership of the land and concurrently entered into a ground lease for an initial term of 50 years (with a maximum term of 99 years inclusive of tenant renewal options) with rent subject to contractual escalations based on the CPI, with a 1% floor and a 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI

/45

Table of Contents

meeting a 0.5% threshold. The ground lease is supported by a Bally’s corporate guarantee and cross-defaulted with the Bally's Master Lease.

On May 13, 2023 the Company, Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bally’s, and Athletics, which owns the Team, entered into the LOI setting forth the terms for developing the Stadium. The Stadium is expected to complement the potential resort redevelopment envisioned at our 35-acre Tropicana Site, owned indirectly by GLPI through its indirect subsidiary, Tropicana Land LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and leased by GLPI to Bally’s pursuant to the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease. The LOI allows for Athletics to be granted fee ownership by GLPI of approximately 9 acres of the Tropicana Site for construction of the Stadium. The LOI provides that following the Stadium site transfer, there will be no reduction in the rent obligations of Bally’s on the remaining portion of the Tropicana Site or other modifications to the ground lease, and that to the extent GLPI has any consent or approval rights under the Tropicana Las Vegas Lease, such rights shall remain enforceable unless expressly modified in writing in the definitive documents. Bally's and GLPI are agreeing to provide the Stadium site transfer in exchange for the benefits that the Stadium is expected to bring to the Tropicana Site. The LOI provides that Athletics shall pay all the costs associated with the design, development, and construction of the Stadium and Bally’s shall pay all costs for the redevelopment of the casino and hotel resort amenities. GLPI is expected to commit to up to $175.0 million of funding for hard construction costs, such as demolition and site preparation and build out of minimum public spaces needed for utilization of the Stadium. The LOI provides that during the development period, rent will be due at 8.5% of what has been funded, provided that the first $15.0 million advanced for the costs of construction of the food, beverage and retail entrance plaza shall not be subject to increased rent. GLPI may have the opportunity to fund additional amounts of the construction under certain circumstances. In addition, the LOI provides that the transaction will be subject to customary approvals and other conditions, including, without limitation, approval of a master plan for the site and certain approvals by the Nevada Gaming Control Board and Nevada Gaming Commission.

Morgantown Lease

On October 1, 2020, the Company and PENN closed on their previously announced transaction whereby GLPI acquired the land under PENN's gaming facility under construction in Morgantown, Pennsylvania in exchange for $30.0 million in rent credits that were utilized by PENN in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company is leasing the land back to an affiliate of PENN pursuant to the Morgantown Lease for an initial term of 20 years, followed by six 5-year renewal options exercisable by the tenant. In lease years two and three, rent increased by 1.5% annually (and on a prorated basis for the remainder of the lease year in which the gaming facility opened) for each of the following three lease years and commencing on the fourth anniversary of the opening date and for each anniversary thereafter, (i) if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and (ii) if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. Hollywood Casino Morgantown opened on December 22, 2021.

Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease

On November 25, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with respect to the HCBR transaction. The HCBR transaction closed on December 17, 2021. The Company retained ownership of all real estate assets at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and simultaneously entered into the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease. The lease has an initial term of 15 years with four 5 year renewal options exercisable by the tenant on the same terms and conditions. See Note 12 for a discussion regarding such renewal options. Annual rent increases by 0.5% for the first six years. Beginning with the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.25% then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. Additionally, the Company's landside development project at Casino Queen Baton Rouge was completed in late August 2023 and the rent under the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was adjusted upon opening to reflect a yield of 8.25% on GLPI's project costs of $77 million. The Company then entered into an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease in connection with the acquisition of the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million on September 6, 2023. The annual rent on the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was increased by $2.7 million for this acquisition. Additionally, the Company anticipates funding certain construction costs of a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million. The rent will be adjusted to reflect a yield of 8.25% for the funded project costs. The Company entered into the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease on November 13, 2023.

Maryland Live! Lease and Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease

On December 6, 2021, the Company announced that it had agreed to acquire the real property assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland, Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia, and Live! Casino Pittsburgh, including applicable long-term ground

/46

Table of Contents

leases, from affiliates of Cordish for aggregate consideration of approximately $1.81 billion, excluding transaction costs, at deal announcement. The transaction also includes a binding partnership on future Cordish casino developments, as well as potential financing partnerships between the Company and Cordish in other areas of Cordish's portfolio of real estate and operating businesses. On December 29, 2021, GLPI closed the acquisition of the Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland and GLPI entered into the Maryland Live! Lease. On March 1, 2022, GLPI closed the acquisition of the Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia and Live! Casino Pittsburgh and leased back the real estate to Cordish pursuant to the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease. The Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease and the Maryland Live! Lease each have initial lease terms of 39 years, with maximum terms of 60 years inclusive of tenant renewal options. The annual rent for both leases has a 1.75% fixed yearly escalator on the entirety of rent commencing on the leases' second anniversary.

Rockford Lease

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a development project in Rockford, IL, that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock, from an affiliate of 815 Entertainment. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into the Rockford Lease with 815 Entertainment. The initial annual rent for the Rockford Lease is subject to fixed 2% annual escalation beginning with the lease's first anniversary and for the entirety of its term.

In addition to the Rockford Lease, the Company has also committed to providing up to $150 million of development funding via the Rockford Loan. Any borrowings under the Rockford Loan will be subject to an interest rate of 10%. The Rockford Loan has a maximum outstanding period of up to 6 years (5-year initial term with a 1-year extension). The Rockford Loan is prepayable without penalty following the opening of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL, which is expected in September 2024. The Rockford Loan advances are subject to typical construction lending terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2023, $40 million was advanced and outstanding under the Rockford Loan. Additionally, the Company also received a right of first refusal on the building improvements of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL if there is a future decision to sell them once completed.

The majority of our earnings are the result of revenues we receive from our triple-net master leases with PENN, Boyd, Bally's, Cordish, Casino Queen and Caesars. In addition to rent, the tenants are required to pay the following executory costs: (1) all facility maintenance, (2) all insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, including coverage of the landlord's interests, (3) taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties (other than taxes on the income of the lessor) and (4) all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties.

Additionally, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC 842"), we record revenue for the ground lease rent paid by our tenants with an offsetting expense in land rights and ground lease expense within the Consolidated Statement of Income as we have concluded that as the lessee we are the primary obligor under the ground leases. We sublease these ground leases back to our tenants, who are responsible for payment directly to the landlord.

Gaming revenue for our TRS Properties (whose operations we sold during 2021) was derived primarily from gaming on slot machines and to a lesser extent, table game and poker revenue, which was highly dependent upon the volume and spending levels of customers at our TRS Properties. Other revenues at our TRS Properties were derived from our dining, retail and certain other ancillary activities.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe the following competitive strengths will contribute significantly to our success:

Geographically Diverse Property Portfolio

As of December 31, 2023, our portfolio consisted of 61 gaming and related facilities. Our portfolio, including our corporate headquarters building, comprises approximately 28.7 million square feet and approximately 5,200 acres of land and is broadly diversified by location across 18 states. We expect that our geographic diversification will limit the effect of a decline in any one regional market on our overall performance.

/47

Table of Contents

Financially Secure Tenants

Five of the company's tenants, PENN, Caesars, Boyd, Cordish and Bally's, are leading, diversified, multi-jurisdictional owners and managers of gaming and pari-mutuel properties and established gaming providers with strong financial performance. With the exception of Cordish, all of the aforementioned tenants are publicly traded companies that are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to file periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Readers are directed to PENN's, Caesar's, Boyd's and Bally's respective websites for further financial information on these companies.

Long-Term, Triple-Net Lease Structure

Our real estate properties are leased under long-term triple-net leases guaranteed by our tenants, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, including coverage of the landlord's interests, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties (other than taxes on our income) and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties.

Resilient Regional Gaming Characteristics

We believe that the recession resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated the resiliency of the regional gaming market. In spite of all our properties being forced to close during mid-March 2020, the Company collected all contractual rents, inclusive of rent credits, due in 2020. Furthermore, our tenants' results since they have reopened has been strong and in some cases better than prior to COVID-19, due to their increased focus on cost efficiencies and decreasing and/or eliminating lower margin amenities. For instance, the rent coverage ratios on all of our leases have increased compared to pre-COVID-19 levels at December 31, 2019. Although we are unable to predict whether these results will continue, we believe that our assets should generate substantial cash flows well into the future for both ourselves and our tenants.

Flexible UPREIT Structure

We operate through an umbrella partnership, commonly referred to as an UPREIT structure, in which substantially all of our properties and assets are held by GLP Capital or by subsidiaries of GLP Capital. Conducting business through GLP Capital allows us flexibility in the manner in which we structure and acquire properties. In particular, an UPREIT structure enables us to acquire additional properties from sellers in exchange for limited partnership units, which provides property owners the opportunity to defer the tax consequences that would otherwise arise from a sale of their real properties and other assets to us. As a result, this structure potentially may facilitate our acquisition of assets in a more efficient manner and may allow us to acquire assets that the owner would otherwise be unwilling to sell because of tax considerations. We believe that this flexibility will provide us an advantage in seeking future acquisitions.

Experienced and Committed Management Team

Our management team has extensive gaming and real estate experience. Peter M. Carlino, our chief executive officer, has more than 30 years of experience in the acquisition and development of gaming facilities and other real estate projects. Through years of public company experience, our management team also has extensive experience accessing both debt and equity capital markets to fund growth and maintain a flexible capital structure.

Segment Information

Due to the sale of the operations of the TRS Properties, the Company's operations consist solely of investments in real estate for which all such real estate properties are similar to one another in that they consist of destination and leisure properties and related offerings, whose tenants offer casino gaming, hotel, convention, dining, entertainment and retail amenities, have similar economic characteristics and are governed by triple-net operating leases. As such, as of January 1, 2022, the Company has one reportable segment. The operating results of the Company's real estate investments are reviewed in the aggregate using the Company's consolidated financial statements by the Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker (as such term is defined in ASC 280 - Segment Reporting).

/48

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Financial Highlights

We reported total revenues and income from operations of $1,440.4 million and $1,068.7 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,311.7 million and $1,029.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The major factors affecting our results for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, were as follows:

•Total income from real estate was $1,440.4 million and $1,311.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Total income from real estate increased by $128.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Current results benefited from the additions to, and/or the full year impact of the Bally's Master Lease, the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease, the Tropicana Lease, the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, and the Rockford Lease and Rockford Loan, which in the aggregate increased cash income by $74.2 million. Current year results also benefited by $15.3 million from escalations on our leases. The Company also recognized favorable straight line rent adjustments of $35.6 million compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, as well as higher accretion of $3.6 million on its Investment in leases, financing receivables. Finally, the Company had higher ground rent income of $1.3 million due primarily to the additions to the Bally's Master Lease. Partially offsetting these favorable variances, was a $1.3 million decline in percentage rent.

•Total operating expenses increased by $89.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the prior year. The reason for the increase was due to a decline in gains from dispositions of property of $67.5 million compared to the prior year due to the sale of the Tropicana Las Vegas building to Bally's in 2022, a $24.2 million increase in depreciation expense due to our recent acquisitions and a $5.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses due primarily from transaction related costs that did not qualify for capitalization as well as higher stock based compensation charges due to higher valuations on the Company's equity awards. Partially offsetting these increases was a property transfer tax recovery of $2.2 million in the current year compared to an impairment charge of $3.3 million in 2022, as well as lower land rights and ground lease expense of $0.9 million and lower provision for credit losses of $0.4 million.

•Other expenses, net increased by $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the prior year. The increase was due to higher borrowing levels that partially funded our recent acquisitions, partially offset by an increase in interest income.

•Income tax expense decreased by $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the prior year The reason for the decrease was primarily due to the taxes incurred on the gain on the sale of the building at Tropicana Las Vegas in 2022.

•Net income increased by $52.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to the variances explained above.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions when applying accounting principles in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The nature of the estimates and assumptions are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain factors or the susceptibility of such factors to change. We have identified the accounting for leases, investment in leases, financing receivables, net, allowance for credit losses, income taxes, and real estate investments as critical accounting estimates, as they are the most important to our financial statement presentation and require difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and, in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition.

/49

Table of Contents

Leases

As a REIT, the majority of our revenues are derived from rent received from our tenants under long-term triple-net leases. Currently, we have master leases with PENN, Caesars, Bally's, Boyd, Cordish and Casino Queen. We also have separate single property leases with PENN, Caesars, Boyd, Cordish and 815 Entertainment. The accounting guidance under ASC 842 is complex and requires the use of judgments and assumptions by management to determine the proper accounting treatment of a lease. We perform a lease classification test upon the entry into any new tenant lease or lease modification to determine if we will account for the lease as an operating or sales-type lease. The revenue recognition model and thus the presentation of our financial statements is significantly different under operating leases and sales-type leases.

Under the operating lease model, as the lessor, the assets we own and lease to our tenants remain on our balance sheet as real estate investments and we record rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the lease term. This includes the recognition of percentage rents that are fixed and determinable at the lease inception date on a straight-line basis over the entire lease term, resulting in the recognition of deferred rental revenue on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred rental revenue is amortized to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the remainder of the lease term. The lease term includes the initial non-cancelable lease term and any reasonably assured renewal periods. Contingent rental income that is not fixed and determinable at lease inception is recognized only when the lessee achieves the specified target.

Under the sales-type lease model, however, at lease inception we would record an Investment in leases, financing receivables on our Consolidated Balance Sheet rather than recording the actual assets we own. Furthermore, the cash rent we receive from tenants is not recorded as rental revenue, but rather a portion is recorded as interest income using an effective yield and a portion is recorded as a reduction to the Investment in leases, financing receivables. Under ASC 842, for leases with both land and building components, leases may be bifurcated between operating and sales-type leases. To determine if our real estate leases trigger full or partial sales-type lease treatment we conduct the five lease tests outlined in ASC 842 below. If a lease meets any of the five criteria below, it is accounted for as a sales-type lease.

1) Transfer of ownership - The lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title.

2) Bargain purchase option - The lease contains a bargain purchase option, which is a provision allowing the lessee, at its option, to purchase the leased property for a price which is sufficiently lower than the expected fair value of the property at the date the option becomes exercisable and that is reasonably certain to be exercised.

3) Lease term - The lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset. However, if the commencement date falls at or near the end of the economic life of the underlying asset, this criterion shall not be used for purposes of classifying the lease.

4) Minimum lease payments - The present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset.

5) Specialized nature - The underlying asset is of such specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term.

The tests outlined above, as well as the resulting calculations, require subjective judgments, such as determining, at lease inception, the fair value of the underlying leased assets, the residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term, the likelihood a tenant will exercise some or all renewal options (in order to determine the lease term), the estimated remaining economic life of the leased assets, and an allocation of rental income received under our Master Leases to the underlying leased assets. A slight change in estimate or judgment can result in a materially different financial statement presentation and income recognition method.

Investment in Leases, Financing Receivables, net

In accordance with ASC 842, for transactions in which we enter into a contract to acquire an asset and lease it back to the seller under a sales-type lease (i.e. a sale leaseback transaction), the Company must determine whether control of the asset has transferred to us. In cases whereby control has not transferred to the Company, we do not recognize the underlying asset but instead recognize a financial asset in accordance with ASC 310 "Receivables". The accounting for the financing receivable

/50

Table of Contents

under ASC 310 is materially consistent with the accounting for our investments in leases - sales type under ASC 842. We have concluded that certain of our leases are required to be accounted for as an Investment in leases - financing receivable on our Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 310, since control of the underlying assets was not considered to have transferred to the Company under GAAP.

Allowance for credit losses

The Company follows ASC 326 “Credit Losses” (“ASC 326”), which requires that the Company measure and record current expected credit losses (“CECL”), the scope of which includes our Investments in leases - financing receivables, net as well as the Company's real estate loans.

We have elected to use an econometric default and loss rate model to estimate the Allowance for credit losses, or CECL allowance. This model requires us to calculate and input lease and property-specific credit and performance metrics which in conjunction with forward-looking economic forecasts, project estimated credit losses over the life of the lease or loan. The Company then records a CECL allowance based on the expected loss rate multiplied by the outstanding investment.

Expected losses within our cash flows are determined by estimating the probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) of our instruments subject to CECL. We have engaged a nationally recognized data analytics firm to assist us with estimating both the PD and LGD. The PD and LGD are estimated during the initial term of the instruments subject to CECL. The PD and LGD estimates were developed using current financial condition forecasts. The PD and LGD predictive model was developed using the average historical default rates and historical loss rates, respectively, of over 100,000 commercial real estate loans dating back to 1998 that have similar credit profiles or characteristics to the real estate underlying the Company's instruments subject to CECL. Management will monitor the credit risk related to its instruments subject to CECL by obtaining the applicable rent and interest coverage on a periodic basis. The Company also monitors legislative changes to assess whether it would have an impact on the underlying performance of its tenant. We are unable to use our historical data to estimate losses as the Company has no loss history to date on its lease portfolio.

We are required to update our CECL allowance on a quarterly basis with the resulting change being recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the relevant period. Finally, each time the Company makes a new investment in an asset subject to ASC 326, we will be required to record an initial CECL allowance for such asset, which will result in a non-cash charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the relevant period. Changes in economic conditions and/or the underlying performance of the property contained within our leases accounted for as financing receivables impacts the assumptions utilized in the CECL reserve estimates. Changes in our assumptions could result in non-cash provisions or recoveries in future periods that could materially impact our results of operations.

Income Taxes - REIT Qualification

We elected on our U.S. federal income tax return for our taxable year that began on January 1, 2014 to be treated as a REIT and we, together with an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, GLP Holdings, Inc., jointly elected to treat each of GLP Holdings, Inc., Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. and Penn Cecil Maryland, Inc. as a TRS effective on the first day of the first taxable year of GLPI as a REIT. In addition, during 2020, the Company and Tropicana LV, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which holds the real estate of Tropicana Las Vegas, elected to treat Tropicana LV, LLC as a TRS. Finally, in advance of the UPREIT Transaction, the Company, together with GLP Financing II, jointly elected for GLP Financing II, Inc. to be treated as a TRS effective December 23, 2021. We intend to continue to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, and meet the various other requirements imposed by the Code relating to matters such as operating results, asset holdings, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership.

As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and dividends paid to our shareholders would not be deductible by us in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to this statutory relief.

Our TRS is able to engage in activities resulting in income that would not be qualifying income for a REIT. As a result, certain activities of the Company which occur within our TRS are subject to federal and state income taxes.

/51

Table of Contents

Real Estate Investments

Real estate investments primarily represent land and buildings leased to the Company's tenants. Real estate investments that we received in connection with the Spin-Off were contributed to us at PENN's historical carrying amount. We record the acquisition of real estate at fair value, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by GLPI includes costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and building improvements. If we used a shorter or longer estimated useful life, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We continually monitor events and circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amount of our real estate investments may not be recoverable or realized. The factors considered by the Company in performing these assessments include evaluating whether the tenant is current on their lease payments, the tenant’s rent coverage ratio, the financial stability of the tenant and its parent company, and any other relevant factors. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable, we determine whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the underlying lease exceeds the real estate investments' carrying value. If we determine the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the asset's carrying value then we would recognize an impairment charge equivalent to the amount required to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value, calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). We group our real estate investments together by lease, the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are available, in evaluating impairment. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value, the Company must make assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors. The factors considered by the Company in performing this assessment include current operating results, market and other applicable trends and residual values, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss.

Results of Operations

The following are the most important factors and trends that contribute or may contribute to our operating performance:

•We have announced or closed numerous transactions in recent years and expect to continue to grow our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional gaming facilities to lease to gaming operators under prudent terms.

•Several wholly-owned subsidiaries of PENN lease a substantial number of our properties and account for a significant portion of our revenue.

•The risks related to economic conditions, including stress in the banking sector, high inflation levels (that have been negatively impacted by the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine as well as conflicts in the Middle East) and the effect of such conditions on consumer spending for leisure and gaming activities, which may negatively impact our gaming tenants and operators and the variable rent and certain annual rent escalators we receive from our tenants as outlined in the long-term triple-net leases with these tenants.

•The ability to refinance our significant levels of debt at attractive terms and obtain favorable funding in connection with future business opportunities.

•The fact that the rules and regulations of U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by legislators, the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws or interpretations thereof, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect GLPI's investors or GLPI.

•Our leases contain variable rent that resets on varying schedules depending on the lease. The Company's percentage rent which is subject to adjustment was 5.3% of total cash rent in 2023 compared to 11.7% in 2022.

/52

Table of Contents

The consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 are summarized below:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023		2022
	(in thousands)







Total revenues	$	1,440,392	$	1,311,685







Total operating expenses	371,688		281,770
Income from operations	1,068,704		1,029,915
Total other expenses	(311,337)		(309,575)
Income before income taxes	757,367		720,340
Income tax expense	1,997		17,055
Net income	755,370		703,285
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in the Operating Partnership	(21,087)		(18,632)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	734,283	$	684,653

The Company has omitted the discussion comparing its operating results for the year ended December 31, 2022 to its operating results for the year ended December 31, 2021 from its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. Readers are directed to Item 7 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for these disclosures.

FFO, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA

Funds From Operations ("FFO"), Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO") and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures used by the Company as performance measures for benchmarking against the Company’s peers and as internal measures of business operating performance, which is used as a bonus metric. These metrics are presented assuming full conversion of limited partnership units to common shares and therefore before the income statement impact of non-controlling interests. The Company believes FFO, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA provide a meaningful perspective of the underlying operating performance of the Company’s current business. This is especially true since these measures exclude real estate depreciation and we believe that real estate values fluctuate based on market conditions rather than depreciating in value ratably on a straight-line basis over time.

FFO, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that are considered supplemental measures for the real estate industry and a supplement to GAAP measures. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding (gains) or losses from dispositions of property, net of tax and real estate depreciation. We define AFFO as FFO excluding, as applicable to the particular period, stock based compensation expense; the amortization of debt issuance costs; bond premiums and original issuance discounts; other depreciation; amortization of land rights; accretion on investment in leases, financing receivables; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; property transfer tax recoveries and impairment charges; straight-line rent adjustments; losses on debt extinguishment; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net, reduced by capital maintenance expenditures. Finally, we define Adjusted EBITDA as net income excluding, as applicable to the particular period, interest, net; income tax expense; real estate depreciation; other depreciation; (gains) or losses from dispositions of property, net of tax; stock based compensation expense; straight-line rent adjustments; amortization of land rights; accretion on Investment in leases, financing receivables; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; property transfer tax recoveries; impairment charges; losses on debt extinguishment; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net.

FFO, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures: (i) do not represent cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP; (ii) should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities; and (iii) are not alternatives to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. In addition, these measures should not be viewed as an indication of our ability to fund our cash needs, including to make cash distributions to our shareholders, to fund capital improvements, or to make interest payments on our indebtedness. Investors are also cautioned that FFO, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other real estate companies, including REITs, due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. Our presentation of these measures does not replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP.

/53

Table of Contents

The reconciliation of the Company’s net income per GAAP to FFO, AFFO, and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023		2022
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	755,370	$	703,285
(Gains) or losses from dispositions of property, net of tax	(22)		(52,844)
Real estate depreciation	260,440		236,809
Funds from operations	$	1,015,788	$	887,250
Straight-line rent adjustments	(39,881)		(4,294)

Other depreciation	2,430		1,879
Amortization of land rights	13,554		15,859
Amortization of debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts (1)	9,857		9,975
Accretion on investment in leases, financing receivables	(23,056)		(19,442)
Non-cash adjustment to financing lease liabilities	469		483
Stock based compensation	22,873		20,427

Losses on debt extinguishment	556		2,189
Property transfer tax recoveries and impairment charges	(2,187)		3,298
Provision for credit losses, net	6,461		6,898
Capital maintenance expenditures	(67)		(159)
Adjusted funds from operations	$	1,006,797	$	924,363
Interest, net (2)	308,090		304,703
Income tax expense	1,997		2,418
Capital maintenance expenditures	67		159
Amortization of debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts (1)	(9,857)		(9,975)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,307,094	$	1,221,668

(1) Such amortization is a non-cash component included in interest, net.

(2) Amounts exclude the non-cash interest expense gross up related to the ground lease for the Maryland Live! property.

Net income, FFO, AFFO, and Adjusted EBITDA were $755.4 million, $1,015.8 million, $1,006.8 million and $1,307.1 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2023. This compared to net income, FFO, AFFO, and Adjusted EBITDA, of $703.3 million, $887.3 million, $924.4 million and $1,221.7 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in net income was primarily driven by a $128.7 million increase in income from real estate as explained below. This was partially offset by higher operating expenses of $89.9 million that are also discussed below. The Company also incurred lower income tax expense of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 due primarily from the sale of the Tropicana Las Vegas building to Bally's in 2022.

The increases in FFO for the year ended December 31, 2023 were due to the items described above, excluding gains from dispositions of property and real estate depreciation. The increases in AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA were due to the items described above, less the adjustments mentioned in the tables above. Adjusted EBITDA also increased as compared to the prior year driven by the explanations above, as well as the adjustments mentioned in the tables above.

/54

Table of Contents

Revenues

Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):


	Year Ended December 31,						Percentage
	2023		2022		Variance		Variance
Rental income	$	1,286,358	$	1,173,376	$	112,982	9.6	%
Income from Investment in leases, financing receivables	152,990		138,309		14,681		10.6	%
Interest income from real estate loans	1,044		—		1,044		N/A

Total income from real estate	1,440,392		1,311,685		128,707		9.8	%

Total income from real estate

Total income from real estate increased $128.7 million, or 9.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Current results benefited from the additions to, and/or the full year impact of the the Bally's Master Lease, the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease, the Tropicana Lease, the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, and the Rockford Lease and Rockford Loan which in the aggregate increased cash income by $74.2 million. Current year results also benefited by $15.3 million from escalations on our leases. The Company also recognized favorable straight line rent adjustments of $35.6 million compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, as well as higher accretion of $3.6 million on its Investment in leases, financing receivables. Finally, the Company had higher ground rent income of $1.3 million due primarily to the additions to the Bally's Master Lease. Partially offsetting these favorable variances was a $1.3 million decline in percentage rent.

/55

Table of Contents

Details of the Company's income from real estate for the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were as follows (in thousands):


Year Ended December 31, 2023	Building base rent		Land base rent		Percentage rent and other rental revenue		Interest income on real estate loans		Total cash income		Straight-line rent adjustments		Ground rent in revenue		Accretion on financing leases		Total income from real estate
Amended Penn Master Lease	$	208,889	$	43,035	$	29,977	$	—	$	281,901	$	(7,610)	$	2,304	$	—	$	276,595
PENN 2023 Master Lease	232,750		—		(312)		—		232,438		25,388		—		—		257,826
Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	239,532		71,256		28,655		—		339,443		7,432		8,255		—		355,130
PENN Morgantown Lease	—		3,092		—		—		3,092		—		—		—		3,092
Caesars Master Lease	63,493		23,729		—		—		87,222		9,378		1,449		—		98,049
Horseshoe St. Louis Lease	23,451		—		—		—		23,451		1,813		—		—		25,264
Boyd Master Lease	79,748		11,786		10,263		—		101,797		2,296		1,729		—		105,822
Boyd Belterra Lease	2,819		1,894		1,889		—		6,602		605		—		—		7,207
Bally's Master Lease	102,438		—		—		—		102,438		—		10,964		—		113,402
Maryland Live! Lease	75,000		—		—		—		75,000		—		8,450		13,503		96,953
Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease	50,000		—		—		—		50,000		—		1,237		8,908		60,145
Casino Queen Master Lease	25,373		—		—		—		25,373		579		—		—		25,952
Tropicana Las Vegas Lease	—		10,555		—		—		10,555		—		—		—		10,555
Rockford Lease	—		2,711		—		—		2,711		—		—		645		3,356
Rockford Loan	—		—		—		1,044		1,044		—		—		—		1,044
Total	$	1,103,493	$	168,058	$	70,472	$	1,044	$	1,343,067	$	39,881	$	34,388	$	23,056	$	1,440,392


Year Ended December 31, 2022	Building base rent		Land base rent		Percentage rent		Total cash income		Straight line rent		Ground rent in revenue		Accretion on financing leases		Other rental revenue		Total income from real estate
PENN Master Lease	$	285,944	$	93,969	$	97,423	$	477,336	$	(11,700)	$	2,495	$	—	$	—	$	468,131
Amended Pinnacle Master Lease	234,835		71,256		28,030		334,121		(1,494)		8,173		—		—		340,800
PENN Meadows Lease	15,811		—		8,824		24,635		2,289		—		—		589		27,513
PENN Morgantown Lease	—		3,047		—		3,047		—		—		—		—		3,047
PENN Perryville Lease	5,871		1,943		—		7,814		196		—		—		—		8,010
Caesars Master Lease	62,709		23,729		—		86,438		10,162		1,512		—		—		98,112
Horseshoe St. Louis Lease	23,161		—		—		23,161		2,103		—		—		—		25,264
Boyd Master Lease	78,184		11,785		10,124		100,093		2,296		1,729		—		—		104,118
Boyd Belterra Lease	2,764		1,894		1,865		6,523		—		—		—		—		6,523
Bally's Master Lease	49,598		—		—		49,598		—		9,603		—		—		59,201
Maryland Live! Lease	75,000		—		—		75,000		—		8,521		12,569		—		96,090
Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease	41,667		—		—		41,667		—		1,001		6,873		—		49,541
Casino Queen Master Lease	22,122		—		—		22,122		442		—		—		—		22,564
Tropicana Las Vegas Lease	—		2,771		—		2,771		—		—		—		—		2,771
Total	$	897,666	$	210,394	$	146,266	$	1,254,326	$	4,294	$	33,034	$	19,442	$	589	$	1,311,685

In accordance with ASC 842, the Company records revenue for the ground lease rent paid by its tenants with an offsetting expense in land rights and ground lease expense within the consolidated statement of income as the Company has concluded that as the lessee it is the primary obligor under the ground leases. The Company subleases these ground leases back to its tenants, who are responsible for payment directly to the landlord.

/56

Table of Contents

The Company recognizes earnings on Investment in leases, financing receivables, based on the effective yield method using the discount rate implicit in the leases. The amounts in the table above labeled accretion on financing leases represent earnings recognized in excess of cash received during the period.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):


	Year Ended December 31,						Percentage
	2023		2022		Variance		Variance


Land rights and ground lease expense	$	48,116	$	49,048	$	(932)	(1.9)	%
General and administrative	56,450		51,319		5,131		10.0	%
Gains from disposition of properties	(22)		(67,481)		67,459		(100.0)	%
Property transfer tax recovery and impairment charge	(2,187)		3,298		(5,485)		(166.3)	%
Depreciation	262,870		238,688		24,182		10.1	%
Provision for credit losses, net	6,461		6,898		(437)		(6.3)	%


Total operating expenses	$	371,688	$	281,770	$	89,918	31.9	%

Land rights and ground lease expense

Land rights and ground lease expense includes the amortization of land rights and rent expense related to the Company's long-term ground leases. Land rights and ground lease expense decreased by $0.9 million, or 1.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The year ended December 31, 2022 had a $2.7 million accelerated write-off due to a partial donation of leased land which was partially offset by higher rent expense due to the acquisition of additional real estate assets that have ground leases.

General and administrative expense

General and administrative expenses include items such as compensation costs (including stock-based compensation awards), professional services and costs associated with development activities. General and administrative expenses increased by $5.1 million, or 10.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The reason for the increase was due primarily from transaction related costs that did not qualify for capitalization as well as higher stock based compensation charges due to higher valuations on the Company's equity awards.

Gains from dispositions of property

Gains from dispositions of property totaled $67.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 which was a result of the $67.4 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the Tropicana Las Vegas building to Bally's.

Property transfer tax recovery and impairment charge

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a property transfer tax recovery of $2.2 million related to a successful appeal initiated by our tenant. During the corresponding period in the prior year, the Company completed the sale of excess land for approximately $3.5 million that had a carrying value of $6.8 million and as such the Company recorded an impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Depreciation expense

Depreciation expense increased by $24.2 million, or 10.1%, to $262.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to the Company's acquisitions over the past year.

Provision for credit losses, net

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a $6.5 million provision for credit losses as compared to a $6.9 million provision in the corresponding period in the prior year. The primary reason for the current year provision was related to the initial provision of $6.2 million on the Rockford Lease and the Rockford Loan and related loan commitment. During 2022, the Company recorded an initial provision of $32.3 million on the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease which was

/57

Table of Contents

originated on March 1, 2022. However, this initial provision was partially offset due to improved performance and updated earnings forecast from its tenant for the properties comprising both the Maryland Live! Lease and the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease. This resulted in improved rent coverage ratios in its reserve calculation which led to a reduction in the required reserves for both financing receivables. See Note 7 for additional information.

Other income (expenses)

Other income (expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):


	Year Ended December 31,						Percentage
	2023		2022		Variance		Variance
Interest expense	$	(323,388)	$	(309,291)	$	(14,097)	4.6	%
Interest income	12,607		1,905		10,702		561.8	%

Losses on debt extinguishment	(556)		(2,189)		1,633		(74.6)	%
Total other expenses	$	(311,337)	$	(309,575)	$	(1,762)	0.6	%

Interest expense

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company's interest expense increased by $14.1 million as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. The increase was due to higher borrowing levels that partially funded our recent acquisitions. See Note 10 for additional information.

Interest income

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased by $10.7 million due to higher cash balances and market interest rates in the current year.

Taxes

Our income tax expense decreased $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we had income tax expense of approximately $2.0 million, compared to income tax expense of $17.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2022. The reason for the decrease was primarily due to the taxes incurred on the gain on the sale of the building at Tropicana Las Vegas in 2022.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership

As partial consideration for certain real estate acquisitions, the Company's operating partnership has issued OP Units. OP Units are exchangeable for common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain terms and conditions. The operating partnership is a variable interest entity ("VIE") in which the Company is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the partnership's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Therefore, the Company consolidates the accounts of the operating partnership, and reflects the third party ownership in this entity as a noncontrolling interest in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and allocates the proportion of net income to the noncontrolling interests on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash flow from operations, borrowings from banks, and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,009.4 million and $920.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $89.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the prior year was primarily due to an increase in cash receipts from customers of $88.1 million along with decreases in cash paid for taxes of $19.3 million and an increase in interest income of $10.7 million, partially offset by increases in cash paid for interest and cash paid for operating expenses of $23.9 million and $5.5 million, respectively. The increase in cash receipts collected from our customers for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, was due to the additions to and/or the full year impact of the Bally's Master Lease,

/58

Table of Contents

the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease, the Rockford Lease and Rockford Loan and the Tropicana Lease as well as escalations incurred on our leases.

Investing activities used net cash of $650.8 million and $354.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2023 consisted primarily of $412.3 million for the acquisition of the real estate assets of Bally's Tiverton, RI and Hard Rock Biloxi, MS properties (which was net of the $200 million deposit paid in the prior year) which were added to the Bally's Master Lease, $32.7 million and $1.8 million for the acquisition of the real estate assets of the Casino Queen Marquette, IA and two building assets at the Belle of Baton Rouge properties, respectively, which were added to the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, and $7.6 million and $8.7 million for land in Joliet, IL and Aurora, IL, respectively. The Company also incurred capital expenditures equal to $47.4 million for the development project at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge. The Company also acquired land for $100.2 million associated with the Rockford Lease which was accounted for as an Investment in lease, financing receivables and $40.0 million in fundings for the Rockford Loan. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2022 consisted primarily of $129.0 million for the acquisition of the real estate assets included in the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease which was accounted for as an Investment in lease, financing receivables, $200 million for a deposit payment for the Bally's Tiverton, RI and Hard Rock Biloxi, MS real estate acquisitions previously discussed, $150.1 million for the acquisition of the real estate assets of Bally's Black Hawk, CO and Rock Island, IL properties which were added to the Bally's Master Lease, and capital expenditures equal to $24.0 million, partially offset by the proceeds of $145.2 million from the sale of the Company's building at Tropicana Las Vegas and the sale of excess land for $3.5 million.

Financing activities provided net cash of $86.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2023 and used net cash of $1,051.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2022. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was driven by $1,077.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and $469.2 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock. This was offset by repayments of long term debt of $585.1 million, dividend payments of $834.0 million, non-controlling interest distributions of $24.1 million, financing costs of $4.0 million and taxes paid related to shares withheld for tax purposes on restricted stock award vestings of $13.4 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 was driven by the repayment of long term debt of $1,271.1 million, dividend payments of $770.9 million, non-controlling interest distributions of $20.7 million, financing costs of $11.9 million and taxes paid related to shares withheld for tax purposes on restricted stock award vestings of $11.9 million. These items were partially offset by $424.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and $611.3 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures are accounted for as either capital project or capital maintenance (replacement) expenditures. Capital project expenditures are for fixed asset additions that expand an existing facility or create a new facility. The cost of properties developed by the Company include costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Capital maintenance expenditures are expenditures to replace existing fixed assets with a useful life greater than one year that are obsolete, worn out or no longer cost effective to repair.

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 we spent approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million respectively, for capital maintenance expenditures. Our tenants are responsible for capital maintenance expenditures at our leased properties. However, during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we incurred $47.4 million and $23.9 million, respectively, on capital project expenditures related to a landside development project at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge.

As described in Note 11, the Company has various funding commitments over the next several years with PENN, Bally's and Casino Queen to develop new casino projects or enhance existing facilities leased by these tenants. The exact amounts and timing of these commitments can not be precisely determined, however the Company expects to fund up to $575 million to develop or enhance facilities leased to PENN under the PENN 2023 Master Lease, consisting of $225 million for the relocation of PENN's riverboat in Aurora, Illinois at a 7.75% cap rate and, if requested by PENN, up to $350 million for the relocation of the Hollywood Casino Joliet as well as the construction of hotels at Hollywood Casino Columbus and a second hotel tower at the M Resort Spa Casino at then current market rates if the funding is requested by PENN. Additionally, the Company is expected to commit up to $175 million of funding for hard construction costs related to the development of a potential casino resort redevelopment envisioned at the Tropicana Site where the Stadium is intended to be constructed for the Athletics. The Company has also committed to provide up to $150 million (of which $40 million was funded as of December 31, 2023) of development funding via the Rockford Loan. Finally, the Company committed funding for certain construction costs of a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million.

/59

Table of Contents

Debt

Term Loan Credit Agreement

On September 2, 2022, GLP Capital entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (“Term Loan Agent”), and the other agents and lenders party thereto from time to time, providing for a $600 million delayed draw credit facility with a maturity date of September 2, 2027 (the “Term Loan Credit Facility”). The Term Loan Credit Facility is guaranteed by GLPI.

The availability of loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility is subject to customary conditions, including pro forma compliance with financial covenants, and the receipt by Term Loan Agent of a conditional guarantee of the Term Loan Credit Facility by Bally’s on a secondary basis, subject to enforcement of all remedies against GLP Capital, GLPI and all sources other than Bally’s. The loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility may be used solely to finance a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition of one or more specified properties of Bally’s in one or a series of related transactions (the “Acquisition”) and to pay fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith. The Company drew down the entire $600 million Term Loan Credit Facility on January 3, 2023 in connection with the closing of Bally's Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton.

Subject to customary conditions, including pro forma compliance with financial covenants, GLP Capital can obtain additional term loan commitments and incur incremental term loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement, so long as the aggregate principal amount of all term loans outstanding under the Term Loan Credit Facility does not exceed $1.2 billion plus up to $60 million of transaction fees and costs incurred in connection with the Acquisition. There is currently no commitment in respect of such incremental loans and commitments.

Interest Rate and Fees

The interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility are, at GLP Capital's option, equal to either a SOFR-based rate or a base rate plus an applicable margin, which ranges from 0.85% to 1.7% per annum for SOFR loans and 0.0% to 0.7% per annum for base rate loans, in each case, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Term Loan Credit Facility. The current applicable margin is 1.30% for SOFR loans and 0.30% for base rate loans. In addition, GLP Capital will pay a commitment fee on the unused commitments under the Term Loan Credit Facility at a rate that ranges from 0.125% to 0.3% per annum, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Credit Facility from time to time. The current commitment fee rate is 0.25%.

Amortization and Prepayments

The Term Loan Credit Facility is not subject to interim amortization. GLP Capital is required to prepay outstanding term loans with 100% of the net cash proceeds from the issuance of other debt that is unconditionally guaranteed by GLPI and conditionally guaranteed by Bally’s (“Alternative Acquisition Debt”) that is received by GLPI, GLP Capital or any of their subsidiaries after the funding date of the Term Loan Facility (other than any incremental term loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement and loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility (as defined below)) except to the extent such net cash proceeds are applied to repaying outstanding loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility. GLP Capital is not otherwise required to repay any loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility prior to maturity. GLP Capital may prepay all or any portion of the loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility prior to maturity without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of any SOFR breakage costs of the lenders, and may reborrow loans that it has repaid. Unused commitments under the Term Loan Credit Facility automatically terminated on August 31, 2023.

Certain Covenants and Events of Default

The Term Loan Credit Facility contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of GLPI and its subsidiaries, including GLP Capital, to grant liens on their assets, incur indebtedness, sell assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, or pay certain dividends and make other restricted payments. The financial covenants include the following, which are measured quarterly on a trailing four-quarter basis: (i) maximum total debt to total asset value ratio, (ii) maximum senior secured debt to total asset value ratio, (iii) maximum ratio of certain recourse debt to unencumbered asset value, and (iv) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. GLPI is required to maintain its status as a REIT and is permitted to pay dividends to its shareholders as may be required in order to maintain REIT status. GLPI is also permitted to make other dividends and distributions, subject to pro forma compliance with the financial covenants and the absence of defaults. The Term Loan Credit Facility also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default. The occurrence and continuance of an event of default, which includes, among others, nonpayment of principal or interest,

/60

Table of Contents

material inaccuracy of representations and failure to comply with covenants, will enable the lenders to accelerate the loans and terminate the commitments thereunder.

Senior Unsecured Credit Agreement and Amended Credit Agreement

On May 13, 2022, GLP Capital entered into a credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") providing for the Initial Revolving Credit Facility maturing in May 2026, plus two six-month extensions at GLP Capital's option. GLP Capital is the primary obligor under the Credit Agreement, which was guaranteed by GLPI.

On September 2, 2022, GLP Capital entered into an amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement (as amended, the "Amended Credit Agreement") among GLP Capital, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (“Agent”), and the several banks and other financial institutions or entities party thereto (as amended by such amendment, the "Amended Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement, GLP Capital has the right, at any time until December 31, 2024, to elect to re-allocate up to $700 million in existing revolving commitments under the Amended Credit Agreement to a new revolving credit facility (the “Bridge Revolving Facility” and, collectively with the Initial Revolving Credit Facility, the "Revolver").

Loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility are subject to 1% amortization per annum. Amounts repaid under the Bridge Revolving Facility cannot be reborrowed and the corresponding commitments are automatically re-allocated to the existing revolving facility under the Amended Credit Agreement. GLP Capital is required to prepay the loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility with 100% of the net cash proceeds from the issuance of Alternative Acquisition Debt that is received by GLPI, GLP Capital or any of their subsidiaries (other than any term loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement and any loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility). Any outstanding commitments under the Bridge Revolving Facility that have not been borrowed by December 31, 2024 are automatically re-allocated to the existing revolving facility under the Amended Credit Agreement.

GLP Capital's ability to borrow under the Bridge Revolving Facility is subject to certain conditions including pro forma compliance with GLP Capital's financial covenants, as well as the receipt by Agent of a conditional guarantee of the loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility by Bally’s on a secondary basis, subject to enforcement of all remedies against GLP Capital, GLPI and all sources other than Bally’s. Loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility will not be treated pro rata with loans under the existing revolving credit facility.

At December 31, 2023, no amounts were outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement. Additionally, at December 31, 2023, the Company was contingently obligated under letters of credit issued pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement with face amounts aggregating approximately $0.4 million, resulting in $1,749.6 million of available borrowing capacity under the Amended Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2023.

The interest rates payable on the loans borrowed under the Revolver are, at GLP Capital's option, equal to either a SOFR based rate or a base rate plus an applicable margin, which ranges from 0.725% to 1.40% per annum for SOFR loans and 0.0% to 0.4% per annum for base rate loans, in each case, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Amended Credit Agreement. The current applicable margin is 1.05% for SOFR loans and 0.05% for base rate loans. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the base rate be less than 1.00%. In addition, GLP Capital will pay a facility fee on the commitments under the revolving facility, regardless of usage, at a rate that ranges from 0.125% to 0.3% per annum, depending on the credit rating assigned to the Amended Credit Agreement from time to time. The current facility fee rate is 0.25%. The Amended Credit Agreement is not subject to interim amortization except with respect to the Bridge Revolving Facility. GLP Capital is not required to repay any loans under the Amended Credit Agreement prior to maturity except as set forth above with respect to the Bridge Revolving Facility. GLP Capital may prepay all or any portion of the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement prior to maturity without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of any SOFR breakage costs of the lenders and may reborrow loans that it has repaid.

/61

Table of Contents

The Amended Credit Agreement contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of GLPI and its subsidiaries to grant liens on their assets, incur indebtedness, sell assets, make investments, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations or pay certain dividends and make other restricted payments. The Amended Credit Agreement includes the following financial covenants, which are measured quarterly on a trailing four-quarter basis: a maximum total debt to total asset value ratio, a maximum senior secured debt to total asset value ratio, a maximum ratio of certain recourse debt to unencumbered asset value and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. GLPI is permitted to pay dividends to its shareholders as may be required in order to maintain REIT status, subject to the absence of payment or bankruptcy defaults. GLPI is also permitted to make other dividends and distributions subject to pro forma compliance with the financial covenants and the absence of defaults. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including the occurrence of a change of control and termination of the Amended PENN Master Lease (subject to certain replacement rights). The occurrence and continuance of an event of default under the Amended Credit Agreement will enable the lenders under the Amended Credit Agreement to accelerate the loans and terminate the commitments thereunder. At December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement.

Senior Unsecured Notes

At December 31, 2023, the Company had an outstanding balance of $6,075.0 million of senior unsecured notes (the "Senior Notes").

On November 22, 2023, the Company issued $400 million of 6.75% senior unsecured notes due December 2033 at an issue price equal to 98.196% of the principal amount. The Company plans to use the net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which may include the acquisition, development and improvement of properties, the repayment of indebtedness, capital expenditures and other general business purposes.

The Company may redeem the Senior Notes of any series at any time, and from time to time, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes redeemed, plus a "make-whole" redemption premium described in the indenture governing the Senior Notes, together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date, except that if Senior Notes of a series are redeemed 90 or fewer days prior to their maturity, the redemption price will be 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes redeemed, together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. If GLPI experiences a change of control accompanied by a decline in the credit rating of the Senior Notes of a particular series, the Company will be required to give holders of the Senior Notes of such series the opportunity to sell their Senior Notes of such series at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes of such series, together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date. The Senior Notes also are subject to mandatory redemption requirements imposed by gaming laws and regulations.

The Senior Notes were issued by GLP Capital and GLP Financing II, Inc. (the "Issuers"), two consolidated subsidiaries of GLPI, and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by GLPI. The guarantees of GLPI are full and unconditional. The Senior Notes are the Issuers' senior unsecured obligations and rank pari passu in right of payment with all of the Issuers' senior indebtedness, including the Amended Credit Agreement, and senior in right of payment to all of the Issuers' subordinated indebtedness, without giving effect to collateral arrangements. GLPI is not subject to any material or significant restrictions on its ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries through dividends or loans or to transfer assets from such subsidiaries, except as provided by applicable law and the covenants listed below.

The Senior Notes contain covenants limiting the Company’s ability to: incur additional debt and use its assets to secure debt; merge or consolidate with another company; and make certain amendments to the PENN Master Lease. The Senior Notes also require the Company to maintain a specified ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. These covenants are subject to a number of important and significant limitations, qualifications and exceptions.

GLPI owns all of the assets of GLP Capital and conducts all of its operations through the operating partnership. Based on the amendments to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X that the SEC released on January 4, 2021, we note that since GLPI fully and unconditionally guarantees the debt securities of the Issuers and consolidates both Issuers, we are not required to provide separate financial statements for the Issuers and GLPI since they are consolidated into GLPI and the GLPI guarantee is "full and unconditional".

Furthermore, as permitted under Rule 13-01(a)(4)(vi), we excluded the summarized financial information for the Issuers because the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Issuers and GLPI are not materially different than the corresponding amounts in GLPI's consolidated financial statements and we believe such summarized financial information would be repetitive and would not provide incremental value to investors.

/62

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants under its Senior Notes.

Distribution Requirements

We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, in order to qualify to be taxed as a REIT (assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied) so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that we distribute. Such distributions generally can be made with cash and/or a combination of cash and Company common stock if certain requirements are met. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. To the extent any of the Company's taxable income was not previously distributed, the Company will make a dividend declaration pursuant to Section 858(a)(1) of the Code, allowing the Company to treat certain dividends that are to be distributed after the close of a taxable year as having been paid during the taxable year.

Outlook

Based on our current level of operations and anticipated earnings, we believe that cash generated from operations and cash on hand, together with amounts available under our Amended Credit Agreement of $1.75 billion and our ability to raise equity proceeds, will be adequate to meet our anticipated debt service requirements, capital expenditures, working capital needs and dividend requirements.

In late December 2022, the Company refreshed its ATM capacity to $1 billion (the "2022 ATM Program"). As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $593.6 million remaining for issuance under the 2022 ATM Program.

We expect the majority of our future growth to come from acquisitions of gaming and other properties to lease to third parties. If we consummate significant acquisitions in the future, our cash requirements may increase significantly and we would likely need to raise additional proceeds through a combination of either common equity (including under our 2022 ATM Program), issuance of additional OP Units, and/or debt offerings. In addition, the Company intends to redeem its 3.350% Notes which are due in September 2024. Our future operating performance and our ability to service or refinance our debt will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. See "Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Capital Structure" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the risk related to our capital structure.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We face market risk exposure in the form of interest rate risk. These market risks arise from our debt obligations. We have no international operations. Our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is not significant to our financial condition or results of operations.

GLPI’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk with respect to its indebtedness of $6,675.4 million at December 31, 2023. Furthermore, $6,075.0 million of our obligations are the senior unsecured notes that have fixed interest rates with maturity dates ranging from less than one year to ten years. An increase in interest rates could make the financing of any acquisition by GLPI more costly, as well as increase the costs of its variable rate debt obligations. Rising interest rates could also limit GLPI’s ability to refinance its debt when it matures or cause GLPI to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness. GLPI may manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to its borrowings by means of interest rate swap agreements. GLPI also expects to manage its exposure to interest rate risk by maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rates for its indebtedness. However, the provisions of the Code applicable to REITs substantially limit GLPI’s ability to hedge its assets and liabilities.

The table below provides information at December 31, 2023 about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts maturing in each fiscal year and the related weighted-average interest rates by maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged by maturity date and the weighted-average interest rates are based on implied forward SOFR rates at December 31, 2023.

/63

Table of Contents


	1/01/24- 12/31/24			1/01/25- 12/31/25			1/01/26- 12/31/26			1/01/27- 12/31/27			1/01/28- 12/31/28			Thereafter			Total		Fair Value at 12/31/2023
	(in thousands)
Long-term debt:
Fixed rate	$	400,000		$	850,000		$	975,000		$	—		$	500,000		$	3,350,000		$	6,075,000	$	5,816,919
Average interest rate	3.35		%	5.25		%	5.38		%	—		%	5.75		%	4.44		%

Variable rate	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	600,000		$	—		$	—		$	600,000	$	600,000
Average interest rate (1)										4.56		%

(1) Estimated rate, reflective of forward SOFR plus the spread over SOFR applicable to the Company's variable-rate borrowing based on the terms of its Credit Agreement. Rate above includes the facility fee on the commitments under the Credit Agreement, which is due regardless of usage, at a rate that ranges from 0.125% to 0.3% per annum, depending on the credit rating assigned to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The current facility fee rate is 0.25%.

/64

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Lease Classification - Lease Term - See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company performs a lease classification test upon the entry into any new tenant lease or amendment or modification of an existing tenant lease to determine if the lease will be accounted for as an operating lease, sales-type lease, or direct financing lease. The accounting guidance under ASC 842 is complex and requires the use of judgements and assumptions by management to determine the proper accounting treatment of a lease. The lease classification tests, and the resulting calculations require subjective judgments, such as determining the likelihood a tenant will exercise all renewal options, in order to determine the lease term. A slight change in an estimate or judgment can result in a material difference in the financial statement presentation.

/65

Table of Contents

Given the significant judgements made by management to determine the expected lease term, we performed audit procedures to assess the reasonableness of such judgments, which required a high degree of auditor judgment.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the judgements surrounding the determination of the lease term for any new, modified, or amended lease included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of the controls over management’s assessment of the likelihood a tenant would exercise all renewal options.

•We evaluated the significant judgements made by management to determine the expected lease term by:

◦Assessing the significance of the leased assets to the tenant’s operations by examining available information, including the tenant’s financial statements, if available.

◦Evaluating the Company’s historical pattern of tenant lease amendments and modifications by examining both confirming and contradictory evidence.

◦Reviewing lease agreements to examine material lease provisions considered by management in their analysis.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

February 27, 2024

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

/66

Table of Contents

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022

Assets
Real estate investments, net	$	8,168,792	$	7,707,935
Investment in leases, financing receivables, net	2,023,606		1,903,195
Real estate loans, net	39,036		—



Right-of-use assets and land rights	835,524		834,067
Cash and cash equivalents	683,983		239,083





Other assets	55,717		246,106
Total assets	$	11,806,658	$	10,930,386

Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	7,011	$	6,561

Accrued interest	83,112		82,297
Accrued salaries and wages	7,452		6,742
Operating lease liabilities	196,853		181,965
Financing lease liability	54,261		53,792
Long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts	6,627,550		6,128,468
Deferred rental revenue	284,893		324,774

Other liabilities	36,572		27,691
Total liabilities	7,297,704		6,812,290

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)

Equity

Preferred stock ($.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022)	—		—
Common stock ($.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 270,922,719 and 260,727,030 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively)	2,709		2,607
Additional paid-in capital	6,052,109		5,573,567
Accumulated deficit	(1,897,913)		(1,798,216)
Total equity attributable to Gaming and Leisure Properties	4,156,905		3,777,958
Non-controlling interests in GLPI's Operating Partnership (7,653,326 units and 7,366,683 units outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively	352,049		340,138
Total equity	4,508,954		4,118,096
Total liabilities and equity	$	11,806,658	$	10,930,386

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

/67

Table of Contents

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per share data)


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021

Revenues
Rental income	$	1,286,358	$	1,173,376	$	1,106,658
Income from investment in leases, financing receivables	152,990		138,309		—
Interest income from real estate loans	1,044		—		—

Total income from real estate	1,440,392		1,311,685		1,106,658
Gaming, food, beverage and other, net	—		—		109,693
Total revenues	1,440,392		1,311,685		1,216,351

Operating expenses
Gaming, food, beverage and other	—		—		53,039

Land rights and ground lease expense	48,116		49,048		37,390
General and administrative	56,450		51,319		61,245
Gains from dispositions of property	(22)		(67,481)		(21,751)
Property transfer tax recovery and impairment charge	(2,187)		3,298		—
Depreciation	262,870		238,688		236,434
Provision for credit losses, net	6,461		6,898		8,226

Total operating expenses	371,688		281,770		374,583
Income from operations	1,068,704		1,029,915		841,768

Other income (expenses)
Interest expense	(323,388)		(309,291)		(283,037)
Interest income	12,607		1,905		197
Insurance proceeds	—		—		3,500
Losses on debt extinguishment	(556)		(2,189)		—
Total other expenses	(311,337)		(309,575)		(279,340)

Income before income taxes	757,367		720,340		562,428
Income tax expense	1,997		17,055		28,342
Net income	$	755,370	$	703,285	$	534,086
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in the Operating Partnership	(21,087)		(18,632)		(39)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	734,283	$	684,653	$	534,047

Earnings per common share:
Basic earnings attributable to common shareholders	$	2.78	$	2.71	$	2.27
Diluted earnings attributable to common shareholders	$	2.77	$	2.70	$	2.26

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

/68

Table of Contents

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(in thousands, except share data)


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Noncontrolling Interest Operating Partnership		Total Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance, December 31, 2020	232,452,220	$	2,325	$	4,284,789	$	(1,612,096)	—		$	2,675,018
Issuance of common stock, net of costs	14,394,709	144		662,194		—		—		662,338

Restricted stock activity	360,008	3		6,960		—		—		6,963
Dividends paid ($2.900 per common share)	—	—		—		(693,353)		—		(693,353)
Issuance of operating partnership units	—	—		—		—		205,088		205,088
Net income	—	—		—		534,047		39		534,086
Balance, December 31, 2021	247,206,937	2,472		4,953,943		(1,771,402)		205,127		3,390,140
Issuance of common stock, net of costs	13,141,499	131		611,125		—		—		611,256
Restricted stock activity	378,594	4		8,499		—		—		8,503
Dividends paid ($2.805 per common share)	—	—		—		(711,467)		—		(711,467)
Issuance of operating partnership units	—	—		—		—		137,043		137,043
Distributions to non-controlling interest	—	—		—				(20,664)		(20,664)
Net income	—	—		—		684,653		18,632		703,285
Balance, December 31, 2022	260,727,030	2,607		5,573,567		(1,798,216)		340,138		4,118,096
Issuance of common stock, net of costs	9,817,430	98		469,115		—		—		469,213

Restricted stock activity	378,259	4		9,427		—		—		9,431
Dividends paid ($3.150 per common share)	—	—		—		(833,980)		—		(833,980)
Issuance of operating partnership units	—	—		—		—		14,931		14,931
Distributions to non-controlling interest	—	—		—		—		(24,107)		(24,107)
Net income	—	—		—		734,283		21,087		755,370
Balance, December 31, 2023	270,922,719	$	2,709	$	6,052,109	$	(1,897,913)	$	352,049	$	4,508,954

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

/69

Table of Contents

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021
Operating activities
Net income	$	755,370	$	703,285	$	534,086
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	276,424		254,547		252,049
Amortization of debt issuance costs, premiums and discounts	9,857		9,975		9,929
Accretion on financing receivables and adjustments to lease liabilities	(22,587)		(18,959)		—

Gains on dispositions of property	(22)		(67,481)		(21,751)
Deferred income taxes	—		—		5,326
Stock-based compensation	22,873		20,427		16,831
Straight-line rent adjustments	(39,881)		(4,294)		(3,993)

Impairment charges and losses on debt extinguishment	556		5,487		—
Provision for credit losses, net	6,461		6,898		8,226
(Increase) decrease,
Other assets	(7,947)		11,777		1,903
(Decrease), increase
Dividend and accounts payable, accrued salaries, wages and expenses	1,222		(251)		(3,412)
Accrued interest	815		10,487		(475)

Other liabilities	6,231		(11,772)		5,059


Net cash provided by operating activities	1,009,372		920,126		803,778
Investing activities
Capital project expenditures	(47,370)		(23,865)		(13,926)
Capital maintenance expenditures	(67)		(159)		(2,270)
Proceeds from assets held for sale and property and equipment, net of costs	—		148,709		2,087
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of transaction costs	—		—		58,993

Loan loss recovery	—		—		4,000
Acquisition of real estate assets and deposit payments	(463,186)		(350,126)		(487,475)

Originations of real estate loans	(40,000)		—		—
Investment in leases, financing receivables	(100,202)		(129,047)		(592,243)

Net cash used in investing activities	(650,825)		(354,488)		(1,030,834)
Financing activities
Dividends paid	(833,980)		(770,858)		(633,901)
Non-controlling interest distributions	(24,107)		(20,664)		—
Taxes paid related to shares withheld for taxes on stock award vestings	(13,442)		(11,924)		(9,867)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	469,213		611,256		662,338
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of senior note discounts	1,077,784		424,000		795,008
Financing costs and costs paid on tender of senior unsecured notes	(3,966)		(11,907)		(7,118)
Repayments of long-term debt	(585,149)		(1,271,053)		(363,391)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	86,353		(1,051,150)		443,069
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents, including cash classified within assets held for sale	444,900		(485,512)		216,013
Decrease in cash classified within assets held for sale	—		—		22,131
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	444,900		(485,512)		238,144
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	239,083		724,595		486,451
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	683,983	$	239,083	$	724,595

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 17 for supplemental cash flow information and noncash investing and financing activities.

/70

Table of Contents

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Business and Basis of Presentation

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. ("GLPI") is a self-administered and self-managed Pennsylvania real estate investment trust ("REIT"). GLPI (together with its subsidiaries, the "Company") was incorporated on February 13, 2013, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PENN Entertainment, Inc., formerly known as Penn National Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN) ("PENN"). On November 1, 2013, PENN contributed to GLPI, through a series of internal corporate restructurings, substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with PENN’s real property interests and real estate development business, as well as the assets and liabilities of Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and Hollywood Casino Perryville (which are referred to as the "TRS Properties") and then spun-off GLPI to holders of PENN's common and preferred stock in a tax-free distribution (the "Spin-Off"). The assets and liabilities of GLPI were recorded at their respective historical carrying values at the time of the Spin-Off in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 505-60 - Spinoffs and Reverse Spinoffs ("ASC 505").

The Company elected on its United States ("U.S.") federal income tax return for its taxable year that began on January 1, 2014 to be treated as a REIT and GLPI, together with its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, GLP Holdings, Inc., jointly elected to treat each of GLP Holdings, Inc., Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge) and Penn Cecil Maryland, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Perryville) as a "taxable REIT subsidiary" ("TRS") effective on the first day of the first taxable year of GLPI as a REIT. In connection with the Spin-Off, PENN allocated its accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) for periods prior to the consummation of the Spin-Off between PENN and GLPI. In connection with its election to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, GLPI declared a special dividend to its shareholders to distribute any accumulated earnings and profits relating to the real property assets and attributable to any pre-REIT years, including any earnings and profits allocated to GLPI in connection with the Spin-Off, to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements.

On July 1, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville to PENN and leased the real estate to PENN pursuant to a standalone lease. On December 17, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge to The Queen Casino & Entertainment Inc., formerly known as CQ Holding Company ("Casino Queen") and leased the real estate to Casino Queen pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease as described below. On December 17, 2021, GLPI declared a special dividend to the Company's shareholders to distribute the accumulated earnings and profits attributable to these sales. In 2021, subsequent to the sale of the operations of the TRS Properties, GLP Holdings, Inc. was merged into GLP Capital, L.P., the operating partnership of GLPI ("GLP Capital").

During 2020, the Company and Tropicana LV, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that at the time held the real estate of the Tropicana Las Vegas Casino Hotel Resort ("Tropicana Las Vegas"), elected to treat Tropicana LV, LLC as a TRS. In September 2022, Bally's Corporation (NYSE: BALY) ("Bally's") acquired both the building assets from GLPI and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas. GLPI retained ownership of the land and entered into a ground lease with Bally's. In connection with this transaction, Tropicana LV, LLC was merged into GLP Capital. GLPI paid a special earnings and profit dividend of $0.25 per share in the first quarter of 2023 related to the sale of the building to Bally's.

GLPI’s primary business consists of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements. As of December 31, 2023, GLPI’s portfolio consisted of interests in 61 gaming and related facilities, the real property associated with 34 gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with 6 gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: CZR) ("Caesars"), the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Boyd Gaming Corporation (NYSE: BYD) ("Boyd"), the real property associated with 9 gaming and related facilities operated by Bally's Corporation (NYSE: BALY) ("Bally's") the real property associated with 3 gaming and related facilities operated by Cordish, the real property associated

/71

Table of Contents

with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Casino Queen and 1 gaming facility under construction that upon opening is intended to be managed by a subsidiary of Hard Rock International ("Hard Rock"). These facilities, including our corporate headquarters building, are geographically diversified across 18 states and contain approximately 28.7 million square feet. As of December 31, 2023, the Company's properties were 100% occupied. GLPI expects to continue growing its portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional gaming facilities to lease to gaming operators under prudent terms.

PENN 2023 Master Lease and Amended PENN Master Lease

As a result of the Spin-Off, GLPI owns substantially all of PENN’s former real property assets (as of the consummation of the Spin-Off) and leases back most of those assets to PENN for use by its subsidiaries pursuant to a unitary master lease (the initial form of such lease the "Original PENN Master Lease"). The Original PENN Master Lease was a triple-net lease, the term of which was scheduled to expire on October 31, 2033, with no purchase option, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

Pursuant to this agreement, the Original PENN Master Lease was amended (the "Amended PENN Master Lease") to remove PENN's properties in Aurora and Joliet, Illinois; Columbus and Toledo, Ohio; and Henderson, Nevada. The properties removed from the Original PENN Master Lease were added to a new master lease. In addition, the existing leases for the Hollywood Casino at The Meadows in Pennsylvania (the "Meadows Lease") and the Hollywood Casino Perryville in Maryland (the "Perryville Lease") were terminated and these properties were transferred into the PENN 2023 Master Lease. Both the Amended PENN Master Lease and the PENN 2023 Master Lease are triple-net operating leases, the term of which expires on October 31, 2033, with no purchase option, followed by three remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions.

The terms of the PENN 2023 Master Lease and the Amended PENN Master Lease are substantially similar to the Original PENN Master Lease with the following key differences:

•The PENN 2023 Master Lease is cross-defaulted and co-terminus with the Amended PENN Master Lease.

•The rent for the PENN 2023 Master Lease is $232.2 million in base rent with fixed annual escalation of 1.50%, with the first escalation occurring on November 1, 2023.

•The rent for the Amended PENN Master Lease is $284.1 million, consisting of $208.2 million of building base rent, $43.0 million of land base rent, and $32.9 million of percentage rent.

Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, Boyd Master Lease and Belterra Park Lease

In April 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the real estate assets of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. ("Pinnacle") for approximately $4.8 billion. GLPI originally leased these assets back to Pinnacle, under a unitary triple-net lease, the term of which expires April 30, 2031, with no purchase option, followed by four remaining 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions (the "Pinnacle Master Lease"). On October 15, 2018, the Company completed its previously announced transactions with PENN, Pinnacle and Boyd to accommodate PENN's acquisition of the majority of Pinnacle's operations, pursuant to a definitive agreement and plan of merger between PENN and Pinnacle, dated December 17, 2017 (the "PENN-Pinnacle Merger"). Concurrent with the PENN-Pinnacle Merger, the Company amended the Pinnacle Master Lease to allow for the sale of the operating assets of Ameristar Casino Hotel Kansas City, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles and Belterra Casino Resort from Pinnacle to Boyd (the "Amended Pinnacle Master Lease") and entered into a new unitary triple-net master lease agreement with Boyd (the "Boyd Master Lease") for these properties on terms similar to the Company’s Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Boyd Master Lease has an initial term of 10 years (from the original April 2016 commencement date of the Pinnacle Master Lease and expiring April 30, 2026), with no purchase option, followed by five 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. The Company also purchased the

/72

Table of Contents

real estate assets of Plainridge Park Casino ("Plainridge Park") from PENN for $250.0 million, exclusive of transaction fees and taxes, and added this property to the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease. The Amended Pinnacle Master Lease was assumed by PENN at the consummation of the PENN-Pinnacle Merger. The Company also entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Boyd in connection with Boyd's acquisition of Belterra Park Gaming & Entertainment Center ("Belterra Park"), whereby the Company loaned Boyd $57.7 million (the "Belterra Park Loan"). In May 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Belterra Park in satisfaction of the Belterra Park Loan, subject to a long-term lease (the "Belterra Park Lease") with a Boyd affiliate operating the property. The Belterra Park Lease rent terms are consistent with the Boyd Master Lease. The annual rent is comprised of a fixed component, part of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the performance of the facilities which is adjusted, subject to certain floors, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of Belterra Park during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease

On December 18, 2020, the Company and Caesars amended and restated the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease (as amended and restated, the "Second Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease") in connection with the completion of an Exchange Agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") with subsidiaries of Caesars in which Caesars transferred to the Company the real estate assets of Waterloo and Bettendorf in exchange for the transfer by the Company to Caesars of the real property assets of Tropicana Evansville, plus a cash payment of $5.7 million. In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the annual building base rent and the annual land base rent were increased.

On November 13, 2023, the Company and Caesars amended and restated the Second Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease (as amended and restated "the "Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease") in connection with Caesars selling its interest in the Belle of Baton Rouge to Casino Queen with no change in rent obligation to the Company. See Note 12 for further discussion.

/73

Table of Contents

Horseshoe St. Louis Lease

On October 1, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Caesars in connection with Caesars’s acquisition of Lumière Place Casino, now known as Horseshoe St. Louis ("Horseshoe St. Louis"), whereby the Company loaned Caesars $246.0 million (the "CZR loan"). The CZR loan bore interest at a rate equal to (i) 9.09% until October 1, 2019 and (ii) 9.27% until its maturity. On the one-year anniversary of the CZR loan, the mortgage evidenced by a deed of trust on the Horseshoe St. Louis property terminated and the loan became unsecured. On June 24, 2020, the Company received approval from the Missouri Gaming Commission to own the real estate assets of Horseshoe St. Louis property in satisfaction of the CZR loan. On September 29, 2020, the transaction closed and the Company entered into a new single property triple net lease with Caesars (the "Horseshoe St. Louis Lease") the initial term of which expires on October 31, 2033, with four separate renewal options of five years each, exercisable at the tenant's option. The Horseshoe St. Louis Lease rent terms were adjusted on December 1, 2021 such that the annual escalator is now fixed at 1.25% for the second through fifth lease years, increasing to 1.75% for the sixth and seventh lease years and thereafter increasing by 2.0% for the remainder of the lease.

Bally's Master Lease

Tropicana Las Vegas Lease

/74

Table of Contents

Morgantown Lease

On October 1, 2020, the Company and PENN closed on their previously announced transaction whereby GLPI acquired the land under PENN's gaming facility under construction in Morgantown, Pennsylvania in exchange for $30.0 million in rent credits that were utilized by PENN in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company is leasing the land back to an affiliate of PENN for an initial term of 20 years, followed by six 5-year renewal options exercisable by the tenant. In lease years two and three rent increased by 1.5% annually (and on a prorated basis for the remainder of the lease year in which the gaming facility opened) and commencing on the fourth anniversary of the opening date and for each anniversary thereafter (i) if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and (ii) if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year (the "Morgantown Lease"). Hollywood Casino Morgantown opened on December 22, 2021.

Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease

On November 25, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the operations of its Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge to Casino Queen for $28.2 million (the "HCBR transaction"). The HCBR transaction closed on December 17, 2021. The Company retained ownership of all real estate assets at Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and simultaneously entered into a triple net master lease with Casino Queen, which includes the Casino Queen property in East St. Louis that was leased by the Company to Casino Queen and the Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge facility (the "Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease"). The lease has an initial term of 15 years with four 5-year renewal options (exercisable by the tenant) on the same terms and conditions. The annual rent increases by 0.5% for the first six years. Beginning with the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.25% then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. Additionally, the Company's landside development project at Casino Queen Baton Rouge was completed in late August 2023 and the rent under the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was adjusted upon opening to reflect a yield of 8.25% on GLPI's project costs of $77 million. Also pursuant to an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease, the Company acquired the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million as of September 6, 2023 and annual rent was increased by $2.7 million for this acquisition. Additionally, the Company anticipates funding certain construction costs for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million, for a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette. The rent will be adjusted to reflect a yield of 8.25% for the funded project costs. The Second Amended and Restated Casino Master Lease was subsequently amended and restated on November 13, 2023 (the "Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease").

/75

Table of Contents

Maryland Live! Lease and Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease

Rockford Lease

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a casino development project in Rockford, IL, that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock, from an affiliate of 815 Entertainment, LLC (together, "815 Entertainment") for $100.0 million. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into a ground lease with 815 Entertainment for a 99 year term. The initial annual rent for the ground lease is $8.0 million, subject to fixed 2% annual escalation beginning with the lease's first anniversary and for the entirety of its term (the "Rockford Lease").

In addition to the Rockford Lease, the Company has also committed to providing up to $150 million of development funding via a senior secured delayed draw term loan (the "Rockford Loan"). Borrowings under the Rockford Loan will be subject to an interest rate of 10%. The Rockford Loan has a maximum outstanding period of up to 6 years (5-year initial term with a 1-year extension). The Rockford Loan is prepayable without penalty following the opening of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL, which is expected in September 2024. The Rockford Loan advances are subject to typical construction lending terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2023, $40.0 million was advanced and outstanding under the Rockford Loan. Additionally, the Company also received a right of first refusal on the building improvements of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL if there is a future decision to sell them once completed.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses for the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Non-controlling interest

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GLPI and its subsidiaries as well as the Company's operating partnership, which is a variable interest entity ("VIE") in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company presents non-controlling interests and classifies such interests as a separate component of equity, separate from GLPI's stockholders' equity and as net income attributable to non-controlling interest in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The operating partnership is a VIE in which the Company is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the partnership's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Therefore, the Company consolidates the accounts of the operating partnership, and reflects the third party ownership in this entity as a noncontrolling interest in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

/76

Table of Contents

Real Estate Investments

Real estate investments primarily represent land and buildings leased to the Company's tenants. The Company records the acquisition of real estate assets at fair value, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by the Company include costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and building improvements which are generally between 10 to 31 years.

The Company continually monitors events and circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amount of its real estate investments may not be recoverable or realized. The factors considered by the Company in performing these assessments include evaluating whether the tenant is current on its lease payments, the tenant’s rent coverage ratio, the financial stability of the tenant and its parent company, and any other relevant factors. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable, the Company determines whether the undiscounted cash flows from the underlying lease exceeds the real estate investments' carrying value. If we determine the estimated undiscounted cash flow are less than the asset's carrying value, then the Company would recognize an impairment charge equivalent to the amount required to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value, calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Company groups its real estate investments together by lease, the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are available, in evaluating impairment. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value, the Company must make assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors. The factors considered by the Company in performing this assessment include current operating results, market and other applicable trends and residual values, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss.

Investment in Leases - Financing receivables

In accordance with ASC 842 - Leases ("ASC 842"), for transactions in which the Company enters into a contract to acquire an asset and leases it back to the seller under a sales-type lease (i.e. a sale leaseback transaction), the Company must determine whether control of the asset has transferred to the Company. In cases whereby control has not transferred to the Company, we do not recognize the underlying asset but instead recognize a financial asset in accordance with ASC 310 "Receivables". The accounting for the financing receivable under ASC 310 is materially consistent with the accounting for our investments in leases - sales type under ASC 842. The Company recognizes interest income on Investment in leases - financing receivables under the effective yield method. Generally, we would recognize interest income to the extent the tenant is not more than 90 days delinquent on their rental obligations. Certain of the Company's leases were required to be accounted for as Investment in leases - financing receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 310, since control of the underlying assets was not considered to have transferred to the Company under GAAP given the significant initial term of each of the leases.

Real Estate Loans

The Company may periodically loan funds to casino owner-operators for the purchase or construction of gaming related real estate. Loans for the construction or purchase of real estate assets of gaming related properties are classified as real estate loans on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest income related to real estate loans is recorded as interest income from real estate loans within the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income in the period earned. Generally, we would recognize interest income to the extent the loan is not more than 90 days delinquent.

Lease Assets and Lease Liabilities

The Company determines whether a contract is or contains a lease at its inception. A lease is defined as the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at the lease commencement date for leases in which the Company acts as lessee. Right-of-use assets represent the Company's rights to use underlying assets for the term of the lease and lease liabilities represent the Company's future obligations under the lease agreement. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based upon the estimated present value of the lease payments. As the rate implicit in the Company's leases (in which the Company acts as lessee) cannot readily be determined, the Company utilizes its own estimated incremental borrowing rates to determine the present value of its lease payments. Consideration is given to the Company's recent debt issuances, as well as publicly available data for instruments with similar characteristics, including tenor, when determining the incremental borrowing rates of the Company's leases.

The Company includes options to extend a lease in its lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise those renewal options. In the instance of the Company's ground leases associated with its tenant occupied properties, the Company has included all available renewal options in the lease term, as it intends to renew these leases indefinitely. The

/77

Table of Contents

Company accounts for the lease and nonlease components (as necessary) of its leases of all classes of underlying assets as a single lease component. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Land rights, net represent the Company's rights to land subject to long-term ground leases. The Company obtained ground lease rights through the acquisition of several of its rental properties and immediately subleased the land to its tenants. These land rights represent the below market value of the related ground leases. The Company assessed the acquired ground leases to determine if the lease terms were favorable or unfavorable, given market conditions at the acquisition date. Because the market rents to be received under the Company's triple-net tenant leases were greater than the rents to be paid under the acquired ground leases, the Company concluded that the ground leases were below market and were therefore required to be recorded as a definite lived asset (land rights) on its books.

Right-of-use assets and land rights are monitored for potential impairment in much the same way as the Company's real estate assets, using the impairment model in ASC 360 - Property, Plant and Equipment. If the Company determines the carrying amount of a right-of-use asset or land right is not recoverable, it would recognize an impairment charge equivalent to the amount required to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value, calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all cash balances and highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Other Assets

Other assets primarily consists of accounts receivable and deferred compensation plan assets (See Note 11 for further details on the deferred compensation plan). Other assets also include prepaid expenditures for goods or services before the goods are used or the services are received. These amounts are deferred and charged to operations as the benefits are realized and primarily consist of prepayments for insurance, property taxes and other contracts that will be expensed during the subsequent year. Other assets at December 31, 2022 included a $200 million deposit that was prefunded to Bally's in September 2022. This amount was credited to the Company in connection with the January 3, 2023 acquisition of the Bally's Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton real estate assets. See Note 6 for further details.

Debt Issuance Costs and Bond Premiums and Discounts

Debt issuance costs that are incurred by the Company in connection with the issuance of debt are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the underlying indebtedness. In accordance with ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, the Company records long-term debt net of unamortized debt issuance costs on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. Similarly, the Company records long-term debt net of any unamortized bond premiums and original issuance discounts on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any original issuance discounts or bond premiums are also amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the underlying indebtedness.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are classified based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820") establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach, and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy related to the subjectivity of the valuation inputs are described below:

•Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

•Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

/78

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for our investments in leases under ASC 842. Upon lease inception or lease modification, we assess lease classification to determine whether the lease should be classified as a sales-type, direct financing or operating lease. As required by ASC 842, we separately assess the land and building components of the property to determine the classification of each component. If the lease component is determined to be a sales-type lease or direct financing lease, we record a net investment in the lease, which is equal to the sum of the lease receivable and the unguaranteed residual asset, discounted at the rate implicit in the lease. Any difference between the fair value of the asset and the net investment in the lease is considered selling profit or loss and is either recognized upon execution of the lease or deferred and recognized over the life of the lease, depending on the classification of the lease. Since we purchase properties and simultaneously enter into new leases directly with the tenants, the net investment in the lease is generally equal to the purchase price of the asset, and, due to the long term nature of our leases, the land and building components of an investment generally have the same lease classification.

The Company recognizes the related income from our financing receivables using an effective interest rate at a constant rate over the term of the applicable leases. As a result, the cash payments received under financing receivables will not equal the income recognized for accounting purposes. Rather, a portion of the cash rent the Company will receive is recorded as interest income with the remainder as a change to financing receivables. Initial direct costs incurred in connection with entering into financing receivables are included in the balance of the financing receivables. Such amounts will be recognized as a reduction to interest income from financing receivables over the term of the lease using the effective interest rate method. Costs that would have been incurred regardless of whether the lease was signed, such as legal fees and certain other third party fees, are expensed as incurred.

The Company recognizes rental revenue from tenants, including rental abatements, lease incentives and contractually fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases when collectability is reasonably assured in accordance with ASC 842. Additionally, percentage rent that is fixed and determinable at the lease inception date is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term, resulting in the recognition of deferred rental revenue on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred rental revenue is amortized to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the remainder of the lease term. The lease term includes the initial non-cancelable lease term and any reasonably assured renewable periods. Contingent rental income that is not fixed and determinable at lease inception is recognized only when the lessee achieves the specified target. Recognition of rental income commences when control of the facility has been transferred to the tenant.

Additionally, in accordance with ASC 842, the Company records revenue for the ground lease rent paid by its tenants with an offsetting expense in land rights and ground lease expense within the Consolidated Statement of Income as the Company has concluded that as the lessee it is the primary obligor under the ground leases. The Company subleases these ground leases back to its tenants, who are responsible for payment directly to the landlord.

The Company may periodically loan funds to casino owner-operators for the purchase of gaming related real estate. Interest income related to real estate loans is recorded as revenue from real estate within the Company's consolidated statements of income in the period earned.

Gaming revenue generated by the TRS Properties mainly consisted of revenue from slot machines and to a lesser extent, table game and poker revenue. Gaming revenue from slot machines is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs, for "ticket-in, ticket-out" coupons in the customers’ possession, and for accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots. Progressive slot machines, which contain base jackpots that increase at a progressive rate based on the number of coins played, are charged to revenue as the amount of the jackpots increase. Table game gaming revenue is the aggregate of table drop adjusted for the change in aggregate table chip inventory. Table drop is the total dollar amount of the currency, coins, chips, tokens, outstanding counter checks (markers), and front money that are removed from the live gaming tables. Gaming revenue is recognized net of certain sales incentives, including promotional allowances in accordance with ASC 606 - Revenues from Contracts with Customers. The Company also defers a portion of the revenue received from customers (who participate in the points-based loyalty programs) at the time of play until a later period when the points are redeemed or forfeited. Other revenues at the TRS Properties are derived from the properties' dining, retail and certain other ancillary activities and revenue for these activities is recognized as services are performed. As of December 31, 2021, the Company no longer operates gaming assets and therefore gaming revenue is no longer recorded.

/79

Table of Contents

Allowance for Credit Losses

Expected losses within our cash flows are determined by estimating the probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) of our investments subject to CECL. We have engaged a nationally recognized data analytics firm to assist us with estimating both the PD and LGD. The PD and LGD are estimated during the initial term of the instruments subject to CECL. The PD and LGD estimates were developed using current financial condition forecasts. The PD and LGD predictive model was developed using the average historical default rates and historical loss rates, respectively, of over 100,000 commercial real estate loans dating back to 1998 that have similar credit profiles or characteristics to the real estate underlying the Company's instruments subject to CECL. Management will monitor the credit risk related to its instruments subject to CECL by obtaining the applicable rent and interest coverage on a periodic basis. The Company also monitors legislative changes to assess whether it would have an impact on the underlying performance of its tenant or borrower. We are unable to use our historical data to estimate losses as the Company has no loss history to date on its lease portfolio. Our tenants and borrowers are current on all of their obligations as of December 31, 2023.

The CECL allowance is recorded as a reduction to our net Investments in leases - financing receivables and real estate loans, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are required to update our CECL allowance on a quarterly basis with the resulting change being recorded in the provision for credit losses, net, in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the relevant period. Finally, each time the Company makes a new investment in an asset subject to ASC 326, the Company will be required to record an initial CECL allowance for such asset, which will result in a non-cash charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the relevant period. See Note 7 for further information.

Charge-offs are deducted from the allowance in the period in which they are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries previously written off are recorded when received. The Company recorded a recovery of $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 for the settlement of a loan that was previously written off to Casino Queen.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company's Amended 2013 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2013 Plan") provides for the Company to issue restricted stock awards, including performance-based restricted stock awards, and other equity or cash based awards to employees. Any director, employee or consultant shall be eligible to receive such awards.

The Company accounts for stock compensation under ASC 718 - Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant. The fair value of the Company's time-based restricted stock awards is equivalent to the closing stock price on the day prior to grant. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm to measure the fair value of performance-based restricted stock awards at grant date using the Monte Carlo model.

The unrecognized compensation cost relating to restricted stock awards and performance-based restricted stock awards is recognized as expense over the awards’ remaining vesting periods. See Note 13 for further information related to stock-based compensation.

Income Taxes

The Company's TRS were able to engage in activities resulting in income that would not be qualifying income for a REIT. As a result, certain activities of the Company which occured within its TRS are subject to federal and state income taxes.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 - Income Taxes ("ASC 740"). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and are measured at the prevailing enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences are settled or realized. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it

/80

Table of Contents

is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realizability of the deferred tax assets is evaluated by assessing the valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of the allowance, if any, as necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the forecast of future taxable income.

ASC 740 also creates a single model to address uncertainty in tax positions, and clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in an enterprise's financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions for the three years ended December 31, 2023.

The Company is required under ASC 740 to disclose its accounting policy for classifying interest and penalties, the amount of interest and penalties charged to expense each period, as well as the cumulative amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If and when they occur, the Company will classify any income tax-related penalties and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in taxes on income within the Consolidated Statements of Income. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized no penalties and interest, net of deferred income taxes.

The Company continues to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit the Company to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to shareholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal, state or local income tax on income that it distributes as dividends to its shareholders, except in those jurisdictions that do not allow a deduction for such distributions. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and dividends paid to its shareholders would not be deductible by the Company in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect the Company's net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. Unless the Company was entitled to relief under certain Internal Revenue Code provisions, the Company also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates earnings per share ("EPS") in accordance with ASC 260 - Earnings Per Share. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding net income attributable to participating securities (unvested restricted stock awards). Diluted EPS reflects the additional dilution for all potentially-dilutive securities such as stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance-based restricted shares and the dilutive effect of the Company's forward sale agreement as described in Note 16. The effect of the conversion of the Operating Partnership ("OP") units to common shares is excluded from the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share because all net income attributable to the Noncontrolling interest holders are recorded as income attributable to non-controlling interests, thus it is excluded from net income available to common shareholders. See Note 15 for further details on the Company's earnings per share calculations.

Segment Information

As described in Note 1, due to the sale of the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge in 2021, the Company's operations consist solely of investments in real estate for which all such real estate properties are similar to one another in that they consist of destination and leisure properties and related offerings, whose tenants offer casino gaming, hotel, convention, dining, entertainment and retail amenities, have similar economic characteristics and are governed by triple-net operating leases. As such, as of January 1, 2022, the Company has one reportable segment. The operating results of the Company's real estate investments are reviewed in the aggregate using the Company's consolidated financial statements, by the Company's chief executive officer who is the chief operating decision maker (as such term is defined in ASC 280 - Segment Reporting).

/81

Table of Contents

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of operators, tenants, or obligors related to the Company's investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. Additionally, concentrations of credit risk may arise when revenues of the Company are derived from a small number of tenants. As of December 31, 2023, substantially all of the Company's real estate properties were leased to PENN, Cordish, Caesars, Bally's and Boyd. During the year ended December 31, 2023, approximately 62%, 11%, 9%, 9% and 8% of the Company's collective income from real estate was derived from tenant leases with PENN, Cordish, Caesars, Bally's and Boyd respectively. PENN, Caesars, Bally's and Boyd are publicly traded companies that are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to file periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Readers are directed to PENN,Caesars, Bally's and Boyd respective websites for further financial information on these companies. Other than the Company's tenant concentration, management believes the Company's portfolio was reasonably diversified by geographical location and did not contain any other significant concentrations of credit risk. As of December 31, 2023, the Company's portfolio of 61 properties is diversified by location across 18 states.

Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, Investment in leases, financing receivables and real estate loans. The Company's policy is to limit the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution and place investments with financial institutions evaluated as being creditworthy, or in short-term money market and tax-free bond funds which are exposed to minimal interest rate and credit risk. At times, the Company has bank deposits and overnight repurchase agreements that exceed federally-insured limits.

3. New Accounting Pronouncements

Pending Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, "Segment Reporting" - Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures." ASU 2023-07 improves disclosure about a public entity's reportable segments and addresses requests from investors for additional, more detailed information about a reportable segment's expenses. The provisions in this amendment are applicable to all public entities, even those with a single reportable segment. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, with early adoption permitted. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance, but does not expect the adoption of ASU 2023-07 to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements and disclosures.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2022

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No 2022-02, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses which eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") and requires that entities disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investment in leases within the scope of ASC 326-20, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses-Measured and Amortized Cost. The Company early adopted the amendments in this update which had no impact on its financial statements or related disclosures as the Company has no TDRs, write-offs, or modifications to disclose on its net investment in leases.

/82

Table of Contents

4. Real Estate Investments

Real estate investments, net, represent investments in rental properties and the corporate headquarters building (excluding our investments in transactions accounted for as real estate loans and investment in leases, financing receivables that are described in Notes 5 and 6, respectively) and is summarized as follows:


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Land and improvements	$	3,559,851	$	3,189,141
Building and improvements	6,787,464		6,407,313
Construction in progress	—		29,564
Total real estate investments	10,347,315		9,626,018
Less accumulated depreciation	(2,178,523)		(1,918,083)
Real estate investments, net	$	8,168,792	$	7,707,935

The Company's landside development project at Casino Queen Baton Rouge was completed in late August 2023. The Company also acquired land and certain real estate assets of Bally's Biloxi, Bally's Tiverton and Casino Queen Marquette in 2023, as well as land in Joliet and Aurora, Illinois for PENN's development projects.

During 2022, the Company entered into an agreement and completed the sale of excess land for approximately $3.5 million that had a carrying value of $6.8 million and as such the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

5. Real estate loans, net

As discussed in Note 1, the Company entered into the Rockford Loan during the year ended December 31, 2023 and $40.0 million of the $150 million commitment was drawn as of December 31, 2023. The Rockford Loan has a 10% interest rate and a maximum outstanding period of up to 6 years (5-year initial term with a 1-year extension). The following is a summary of the balances of the Company's Real estate loans, net.


	December 31, 2023
	(in thousands)
Real estate loans	$	40,000
Less: Allowance for credit losses	(964)
Real estate loans, net	$	39,036

The change in the allowance for credit losses for the Company's Real estate loans is shown below (in thousands):


	Rockford Loan
Balance at December 31, 2022	$	—
Change in allowance	(964)
Ending balance at December 31, 2023	$	(964)

The Rockford Loan is subject to CECL, which is described in Note 7. The Company recorded provision for credit losses of $1.0 million and $2.6 million on the Rockford Loan and the associated $110 million unfunded loan commitment, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2023. The reserve for the unfunded loan commitment was recorded in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The borrower is current on its loan obligation as of December 31, 2023.

/83

6. Acquisitions

The Company accounts for its acquisitions of real estate assets as asset acquisitions under ASC 805 - Business Combinations. Under asset acquisition accounting, transaction costs incurred to acquire the purchased assets are also included as part of the asset cost.

Current year acquisitions

On January 3, 2023, the Company closed its previously announced acquisition from Bally's of the land and real estate assets of Bally's Biloxi and Bally's Tiverton. The properties were added to the Bally's Master Lease and annual rent was increased by $48.5 million. The purchase price allocation of these assets based on their fair values at the acquisition date are summarized below (in thousands).


Land and improvements	$	321,155
Building and improvements	306,100
Total purchase price	$	627,255

At closing, the Company was credited its previously funded $200 million deposit that was recorded in other assets at December 31, 2022 as well as a $9.0 million transaction fee that was recorded against the purchase price. The Company continues to have the option, subject to receipt by Bally's of required consents, to acquire the real property assets of Bally's Lincoln prior to December 31, 2026 for a purchase price of $771.0 million and additional annual rent of $58.8 million.

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a development project in Rockford, IL, that upon opening is intended to be managed by Hard Rock, from an affiliate of 815 Entertainment, LLC. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into the Rockford Lease. The transaction was accounted for as a failed sale leaseback and as such the purchase price was allocated to Investment in leases, financing receivables in the amount of $100.2 million.

On September 6, 2023, the Company acquired the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million. The property was added to the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease and annual rent was increased by $2.7 million. The purchase price allocation of these assets based on their fair values at the acquisition date are summarized below (in thousands).


Land and improvements	$	32,032
Building and improvements	690
Total purchase price	$	32,722

Prior year acquisitions

On March 1, 2022, the Company completed its previously announced transaction with Cordish to acquire the real property assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia and Live! Casino Pittsburgh and simultaneously entered into the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease such that Cordish continues to operate the facilities. The Company has concluded that the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease is required to be accounted for as an Investment in leases, financing receivables on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 310, since control of the underlying assets was not considered to have transferred to the Company under GAAP given the significant initial lease term of the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease which was 39 years. The purchase price of $689.0 million was recorded in Investment in leases, financing receivables, net.

On April 13, 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into a binding term sheet with Bally's to acquire the real estate of Bally’s casino properties in Black Hawk, CO and its recently acquired property in Rock Island, IL, in a transaction that was subject to regulatory approval. This transaction closed on April 1, 2022 and total consideration for the acquisition was $150 million. The parties added the properties to the Bally's Master Lease for incremental rent of $12.0 million.

In addition, Bally’s has granted GLPI a right of first refusal to fund the real property acquisition or development project costs associated with any and all potential future transactions in Michigan, Maryland, New York and Virginia through one or more sale-leaseback or similar transactions for a term of seven years.

/84

The purchase price for the acquisition of the real estate assets of Black Hawk and Rock Island were as follows (in thousands):


Land	$	54,386
Building and improvements	95,740
Real estate investments, net	$	150,126

7. Investment in leases, financing receivables, net

Certain of the Company's leases are recorded as an Investment in leases, financing receivables, net, as the sale lease back transactions were accounted for as failed sale leasebacks due to the leases significant initial lease terms. The following is a summary of the balances of the Company's investment in leases, financing receivables (in thousands).


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022
Minimum lease payments receivable	$	9,088,298	$	6,676,528
Estimated residual values of lease property (unguaranteed)	1,041,087		940,885
Gross investment in leases, financing receivables	10,129,385		7,617,413

Less: Unearned income	(8,083,808)		(5,695,094)
Less: Allowance for credit losses	(21,971)		(19,124)
Net Investment in leases, financing receivables	$	2,023,606	$	1,903,195

The present value of the net investment in the lease payment receivable and unguaranteed residual value at December 31, 2023 was $1,991.4 million and $54.2 million, respectively compared to $1,871.5 million and $50.8 million, respectively at December 31, 2022.

At December 31, 2023, minimum lease payments owed to us for each of the five succeeding years under the Company's financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,	Future Minimum Lease Payments
2024	$	137,339
2025	139,746
2026	142,195
2027	144,687
2028	147,223
Thereafter	8,377,107
Total	$	9,088,298

/85

The change in the allowance for credit losses for the Company's financing receivables is illustrated below (in thousands):


	Rockford Lease		Maryland Live! Lease		Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease		Total
Balance at December 31, 2021	$	—	$	12,226	$	—	$	12,226
Initial allowance from current period investments	—		—		32,277		32,277
Current period change in credit allowance	—		(8,131)		(17,248)		$	(25,379)
Ending balance at December 31, 2022	$	—	$	4,095	$	15,029	$	19,124
Initial allowance from current period investments	3,867		—		—		3,867
Current period change in credit allowance	(1,193)		1,566		(1,393)		(1,020)
Ending balance at December 31, 2023	$	2,674	$	5,661	$	13,636	$	21,971

The amortized cost basis of the Company's investment in leases, financing receivables by year of origination is shown below as of December 31, 2023 (in thousands):


	Origination year
	2023			2022			2021			Total
Investment in leases, financing receivables	$	100,847		$	704,763		$	1,239,967		$	2,045,577
Allowance for credit losses	(2,674)			(13,636)			(5,661)			(21,971)
Amortized cost basis at December 31, 2023	$	98,173		$	691,127		$	1,234,306		$	2,023,606

Allowance as a percentage of outstanding financing receivable	(2.65)		%	(1.93)		%	(0.46)		%	(1.07)		%

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses, net of $6.5 million.

The primary reason for the current year provision was related to the Rockford Lease and the Rockford Loan and related loan commitment (See Note 5 for further discussion).

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses, net of $6.9 million.

This was due to an initial allowance for credit losses of $32.3 million on the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease which was originated on March 1, 2022. However, this initial provision was partially offset due to improved performance and an updated earnings forecast from its tenant at the properties comprising both the Maryland Live! Lease and the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease. This resulted in improved rent coverage ratios in the reserve calculation which led to a reduction in the required reserves for both financing receivables.

The reason for the higher allowance for credit losses as a percentage of the outstanding investment in leases for the

Rockford Lease and Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease compared to the Maryland Live! Lease is primarily due to the significantly higher rent coverage ratio on the Maryland Live! Lease compared to the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease and the expected coverage ratio on the Rockford Lease. Future changes in economic probability factors, changes in the estimated value of our real estate property and earnings assumptions at the underlying facilities may result in non-cash provisions or recoveries in future periods that could materially impact our results of operations.

8. Lease Assets and Lease Liabilities

Lease Assets

The Company is subject to various operating leases as lessee for both real estate and equipment, the majority of which are ground leases related to properties the Company leases to its tenants under triple-net operating leases. These ground leases may include fixed rent, as well as variable rent based upon an individual property’s performance or changes in an index such as the CPI and have maturity dates ranging from 2028 to 2108, when considering all renewal options. For certain of these ground leases, the Company’s tenants are responsible for payment directly to the third-party landlord. Under ASC 842, the Company is required to gross-up its consolidated financial statements for these ground leases as the Company is considered the primary

/86

obligor. In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, the Company recorded right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet to represent its rights to use the underlying leased assets and its future lease obligations, respectively, including for those ground leases paid directly by our tenants. Because the right-of-use asset relates, in part, to the same leases which resulted in the land right assets the Company recorded on its Consolidated Balance Sheet in conjunction with the Company's assumption of below market leases at the time it acquired the related land and building assets, the Company is required to report the right-of-use assets and land rights in the aggregate on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Components of the Company's right-of use assets and land rights, net are detailed below (in thousands):


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022
Right-of-use assets - operating leases (1)	$	196,254	$	181,243
Land rights, net	639,270		652,824
Right-of-use assets and land rights, net	$	835,524	$	834,067

(1) During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired certain real estate assets at the Belle at Baton Rouge and the previously recorded right-of-use assets and related accumulated amortization associated with the ground leases at this property totaling $0.4 million were written off.

Land Rights

The land rights are amortized over the individual lease term of the related ground lease, including all renewal options, which ranged from 10 years to 92 years at their respective acquisition dates. Land rights net, consist of the following:


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Land rights (2)	$	727,114	$	727,796
Less accumulated amortization (2)	(87,844)		(74,972)
Land rights, net	$	639,270	$	652,824

(2) During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired certain real estate assets at the Belle at Baton Rouge and the previously recorded land rights and related accumulated amortization associated with the ground leases at this property totaling $0.7 million were written off.

/87

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded $2.7 million of accelerated land right amortization as it donated a portion of the land underlying a ground lease.

As of December 31, 2023, estimated future amortization expense related to the Company’s land rights by fiscal year is as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,
2024	$	13,104
2025	13,104
2026	13,104
2027	13,104
2028	13,104
Thereafter	573,750
Total	$	639,270

Operating Lease Liabilities

At December 31, 2023, maturities of the Company's operating lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,
2024	$	14,566
2025	14,510
2026	14,512
2027	14,038
2028	13,920
Thereafter	642,022
Total lease payments	$	713,568
Less: interest	(516,715)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	196,853

Lease Expense

Operating lease costs represent the entire amount of expense recognized for operating leases that are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Variable lease costs are not included in the measurement of the lease liability and include both lease payments tied to a property's performance and changes in an index such as the CPI that are not determinable at lease commencement, while short-term lease costs are costs for those operating leases with a term of 12 months or less.

The components of lease expense were as follows:


	Year Ended December 31, 2023		Year Ended December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Operating lease cost	$	14,805	$	13,477
Variable lease cost	19,757		19,755
Short-term lease cost	—		2
Amortization of land right assets	13,554		15,859
Total lease cost	$	48,116	$	49,093

Amortization expense related to the land right intangibles, as well as variable lease costs and the majority of the Company's operating lease costs are recorded within land rights and ground lease expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Company's short-term lease costs as well as a small portion of operating lease costs are recorded in both gaming, food, beverage and other expense and general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income.

/88

Supplemental Disclosures Related to Operating Leases

Supplemental balance sheet information related to the Company's operating leases was as follows:


			December 31, 2023
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases			50.71 years
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases			6.57%

Supplemental cash flow information related to the Company's operating leases was as follows:


	Year Ended December 31, 2023		Year Ended December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases (1)	$	1,618	$	1,617

(1) The Company's cash paid for operating leases is significantly less than the lease cost for the same period due to the majority of the Company's ground lease rent being paid directly to the landlords by the Company's tenants. Although GLPI expends no cash related to these leases, they are required to be grossed up in the Company's financial statements under ASC 842.

Financing Lease Liabilities

In connection with the acquisition of the real property assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland, the Company acquired the rights to land subject to a long-term ground lease which expires on June 6, 2111. As the Maryland Live! Lease was accounted for as an Investment in lease, financing receivable, the underlying ground lease was accounted for as a financing lease obligation within Lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In accordance with ASC 842, the Company records revenue for the ground lease rent paid by its tenant with an offsetting expense in interest expense as the Company has concluded that as the lessee it is the primary obligor under the ground leases. The ground lease contains variable lease payments based on a percentage of gaming revenues generated by the facility and has fixed minimum annual payments. The Company discounted the fixed minimum annual payments at 5.0% to arrive at the initial lease obligation. At December 31, 2023, maturities of this finance lease were as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,
2024	$	2,244
2025	2,267
2026	2,289
2027	2,313
2028	2,335
Thereafter	299,723
Total lease payments	$	311,171
Less: Interest	(256,910)
Present value of finance lease liability	$	54,261

9. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate:

/89

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximates the carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, due to the short maturity of the cash equivalents.

Investment in leases, financing receivables, net

The fair value of the Company's net investment in leases, financing receivables, is based on the value of the underlying

real estate property the Company owns related to the Maryland Live! Lease, the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease, and the Rockford Lease. The initial fair value was the price paid by the Company to acquire the real estate. The initial fair value is then adjusted for changes in the commercial real estate price index and as such is a Level 3 measurement as defined under ASC 820.

Deferred Compensation Plan Assets

The Company's deferred compensation plan assets consist of open-ended mutual funds and as such the fair value measurement of the assets is considered a Level 1 measurement as defined under ASC 820. Deferred compensation plan assets are included within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Real Estate Loans, net

The fair value of the real estate loans approximates the gross carrying value of the Company's real estate loans, as

collection on the outstanding loan balance is reasonably assured and the loan was recently originated on market based terms.

The fair value measurement of the real estate loans is considered a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820.

Long-term Debt

The fair value of the Senior Notes are estimated based on quoted prices in active markets and as such are Level 1 measurements as defined under ASC 820. The fair value of the obligations in our Amended Credit Agreement is based on indicative pricing from market information (Level 2 inputs).

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2023				December 31, 2022
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	683,983	$	683,983	$	239,083	$	239,083
Investment in leases, financing receivables, net	2,023,606		1,969,326		1,903,195		1,900,971
Real estate loans, net	39,036		40,299		—		—
Deferred compensation plan assets	32,894		32,894		27,387		27,387

Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt:
Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Facility	600,000		600,000		—		—
Senior unsecured notes	6,075,000		5,816,919		6,175,000		5,715,963

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

/90

10. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt, net of current maturities and unamortized debt issuance costs is as follows:


	December 31, 2023		December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Unsecured $1,750 million revolver	$	—	$	—




Term Loan Credit Facility due September 2027	600,000		—
$500 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due November 2023	—		500,000
$400 million 3.350% senior unsecured notes due September 2024	400,000		400,000
$850 million 5.250% senior unsecured notes due June 2025	850,000		850,000
$975 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due April 2026	975,000		975,000
$500 million 5.750% senior unsecured notes due June 2028	500,000		500,000
$750 million 5.300% senior unsecured notes due January 2029	750,000		750,000
$700 million 4.000% senior unsecured notes due January 2030	700,000		700,000
$700 million 4.000% senior unsecured notes due January 2031	700,000		700,000
$800 million 3.250% senior unsecured notes due January 2032	800,000		800,000
$400 million 6.750% senior unsecured notes due December 2033	400,000		—
Other	434		583
Total long-term debt	$	6,675,434	$	6,175,583
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts	(47,884)		(47,115)
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts	$	6,627,550	$	6,128,468

The following is a schedule of future minimum repayments of long-term debt as of December 31, 2023 (in thousands):


2024	$	400,156
2025	850,164
2026	975,114
2027	600,000
2028	500,000
Over 5 years	3,350,000
Total minimum payments	$	6,675,434

Term Loan Credit Agreement

/91

aggregate principal amount of all term loans outstanding under the Term Loan Credit Facility does not exceed $1.2 billion plus up to $60 million of transaction fees and costs incurred in connection with the Acquisition. There is currently no commitment in respect of such incremental loans and commitments.

Interest Rate and Fees

The interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the Term Loan Credit Facility are, at GLP Capital's option, equal to either a Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") based rate or a base rate plus an applicable margin, which ranges from 0.85% to 1.7% per annum for SOFR loans and 0.0% to 0.7% per annum for base rate loans, in each case, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Term Loan Credit Facility. The current applicable margin is 1.30% for SOFR loans and 0.30% for base rate loans. In addition, GLP Capital will pay a commitment fee on the unused commitments under the Term Loan Credit Facility at a rate that ranges from 0.125% to 0.3% per annum, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Credit Facility from time to time. The current commitment fee rate is 0.25%. The weighted average interest rate under the Term Loan Credit Facility at December 31, 2023 was 6.76%.

Amortization and Prepayments

Certain Covenants and Events of Default

Senior Unsecured Credit Agreement and Amended Credit Agreement

On May 13, 2022, GLP Capital entered into a credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") providing for a $1.75 billion revolving credit facility (the "Initial Revolving Credit Facility") maturing in May 2026, plus two six-month extensions at GLP Capital's option. The majority of our debt is at fixed rates and our exposure to variable interest rates is currently limited to outstanding obligations, if any, under the Initial Revolving Credit Facility and our Term Loan Credit Agreement. GLP Capital is the primary obligor under the Credit Agreement, which was guaranteed by GLPI.

On September 2, 2022, GLP Capital entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement among GLP Capital, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (“Agent”), and the several banks and other financial institutions or entities party thereto (the Credit Agreement, as amended by such amendment, the "Amended Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement, GLP Capital has the right, at any time until December 31, 2024, to elect to re-allocate up to $700 million in existing revolving commitments under the Amended Credit Agreement to a new revolving credit facility (the “Bridge Revolving Facility” and, collectively with the Initial Revolving Credit Facility, the "Revolver").

/92

GLP Capital's ability to borrow under the Bridge Revolving Facility is subject to certain conditions including pro

forma compliance with GLP Capital's financial covenants, as well as the receipt by Agent of a conditional guarantee of the

loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility by Bally’s on a secondary basis, subject to enforcement of all remedies against GLP

Capital, GLPI and all sources other than Bally’s. Loans under the Bridge Revolving Facility will not be treated pro rata with

loans under the existing revolving credit facility.

The interest rates payable on the loans borrowed under the Revolver are, at GLP Capital's option, equal to either a

SOFR based rate or a base rate plus an applicable margin, which ranges from 0.725% to 1.40% per annum for SOFR loans and 0.0% to 0.4% per annum for base rate loans, in each case, depending on the credit ratings assigned to the Amended Credit Agreement. The current applicable margin is 1.05% for SOFR loans and 0.05% for base rate loans. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the base rate be less than 1.00%. In addition, GLP Capital will pay a facility fee on the commitments under the revolving facility, regardless of usage, at a rate that ranges from 0.125% to 0.3% per annum, depending on the credit rating assigned to the Amended Credit Agreement from time to time. The current facility fee rate is 0.25%. The Amended Credit Agreement is not subject to interim amortization except with respect to the Bridge Revolving Facility. GLP Capital is not required to repay any loans under the Amended Credit Agreement prior to maturity except as set forth above with respect to the Bridge Revolving Facility. GLP Capital may prepay all or any portion of the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement prior to maturity without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of any SOFR breakage costs of the lenders and may reborrow loans that it has repaid.

Senior Unsecured Notes

At December 31, 2023, the Company had $6,075.0 million of outstanding senior unsecured notes (the "Senior Notes"). Each of the Company's Senior Notes contain covenants limiting the Company’s ability to: incur additional debt and use its assets to secure debt; merge or consolidate with another company; and make certain amendments to the Amended PENN Master Lease. The Senior Notes also require the Company to maintain a specified ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. These covenants are subject to a number of important and significant limitations, qualifications and exceptions.

/93

general corporate purposes, which may include the acquisition, development and improvement of properties, the repayment of indebtedness, capital expenditures and other general business purposes.

On January 13, 2023, the Company announced that it called for redemption all of the $500.0 million, 5.375% Senior

Notes due in 2023 (the "Notes"). The Company redeemed all of the Notes on February 12, 2023 (the "Redemption Date") for

$507.5 million which represented 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued interest through the Redemption

Date, incurring a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million, primarily related to debt issuance write-offs. GLPI

funded the redemption of the Notes primarily from cash on hand as well as through the settlement of a forward sale agreement

that occurred in February 2023 which resulted in the issuance of 1,284,556 shares which raised net proceeds of $64.6 million.

See Note 16 for additional discussion.

At December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants under its Senior Notes.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is subject to various legal and administrative proceedings relating to personal injuries, employment matters, commercial transactions, and other matters arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the final outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Company maintains what it believes is adequate insurance coverage to further mitigate the risks of such proceedings. However, such proceedings can be costly, time consuming, and unpredictable and, therefore, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of such proceedings may not materially impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Further, no assurance can be given that the amount or scope of existing insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover losses arising from such matters.

Funding commitments

The Company has agreed to a funding mechanism to support PENN's pursuit of relocation and development

opportunities at several of the properties included in the PENN 2023 Master Lease. GLPI agreed to fund up to $225 million for

the relocation of PENN's riverboat casino in Aurora at a 7.75% cap rate and, if requested by PENN, will fund up to

$350 million for the relocation of the Hollywood Casino Joliet, the construction of a hotel at Hollywood Casino

Columbus and the construction of a second hotel tower at the M Resort Spa Casino at then current market rates. The funding commitment expires on January 1, 2026.

See Note 1 for a discussion on the potential future funding commitments the Company may have in connection with

the possible future transaction with Bally's and the Athletics at the Tropicana Site.

/94

As discussed in Note 1, the Company has also committed to providing up to $150 million (of which $40 million was

funded as of December 31, 2023) of development funding via the Rockford Loan. Any borrowings under the Rockford Loan

will be subject to an interest rate of 10%. The Rockford Loan has a maximum outstanding

period of up to 6 years (5-year initial term with a 1-year extension). The Rockford Loan is prepayable without penalty

following the opening of the Hard Rock Casino in Rockford, IL, which is expected in September 2024. The Rockford Loan

advances are subject to typical construction lending terms and conditions.

Finally, the Company has agreed and anticipates funding certain construction costs of a landside development project

at Casino Queen Marquette for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which covers all eligible employees. The plan enables participating employees to defer a portion of their salary and/or their annual bonus in a retirement fund to be administered by the Company. Prior to January 1, 2023, the Company made a discretionary match contribution of 50% of employees' elective salary deferrals, up to a maximum of 6% of eligible employee compensation. On January 1, 2023, the Company amended its defined contribution plan to be a Nonelective Safe Harbor Plan as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. Commencing January 1, 2023, the Company makes safe harbor nonelective contributions equal to 3% of each participant's compensation and such contributions are fully vested and nonforfeitable at all times. The matching contributions for the defined contribution plan were $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022 and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that covers most management and other highly-compensated employees. The plan allows the participants to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a portion of their base annual salary and/or their annual bonus, and earn tax-deferred earnings on these deferrals. The plan also provides for matching Company contributions that vest over a five-year period. The Company has established a Trust, and transfers to the Trust, on a periodic basis, an amount necessary to provide for its respective future liabilities with respect to participant deferral and Company contribution amounts. The Company's matching contributions for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan for each of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were $0.5 million. The Company's deferred compensation liability, which was included in other liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $32.9 million and $25.8 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Assets held in the Trust were $31.8 million and $27.4 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and are included in other assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

12. Revenue Recognition

Revenues from Real Estate

As of December 31, 2023, 14 of the Company’s real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of PENN under the Amended PENN Master Lease, 7 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary under the PENN 2023 Master Lease, an additional 12 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of PENN under the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, 5 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of Caesars under the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease, 3 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of Boyd under the Boyd Master Lease, 8 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of Bally's under the Bally's Master Lease, 2 of the Company's real estate investment properties were leased to a subsidiary of Cordish under the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease and 4 of the Company's real estate properties were leased to a subsidiary of Casino Queen under the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease. Additionally, the land under PENN's Hollywood Casino Morgantown is subject to the Morgantown Lease. Finally, the Company has single property triple net leases with Caesars under the Horseshoe St. Louis Lease, Boyd under the Belterra Park Lease, Bally's under the Tropicana Lease and Cordish under the Maryland Live! Lease and 815 Entertainment under the Rockford Lease.

Guarantees

The obligations under the Amended PENN Master Lease, PENN 2023 Master Lease, Amended Pinnacle Master Lease and Morgantown Lease, are guaranteed by PENN and, with respect to each lease, jointly and severally by PENN's subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities covered by such lease. Similarly, the obligations under the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease, the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease and Bally's Master Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by the parent company and by the subsidiaries that occupy and operate the leased facilities. The

/95

obligations under the Boyd Master Lease, the Maryland Live! Lease, the Pennsylvania Live! Lease and the Rockford Lease are jointly and severally guaranteed by the subsidiaries that occupy and operate the facilities.

Rent

Rent under the PENN 2023 Master Lease is fixed with annual escalations on the entirety of rent increasing by 1.5% annually on November 1. The rent structure under the Amended PENN Master Lease includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual 2% escalator if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the revenues of the facilities, which is prospectively adjusted, subject to certain floors (namely the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course property due to PENN's opening of a competing facility) every five years to an amount equal to 4% of the average net revenues of all facilities under the Amended PENN Master Lease during the preceding five years in excess of a contractual baseline.

Similar to the Amended PENN Master Lease, the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease also includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual 2% escalator if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met and a component that is based on the revenues of the facilities, which is prospectively adjusted, subject to certain floors (namely the Bossier City Boomtown property due to PENN's acquisition of a competing facility, Margaritaville Resort Casino), every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average net revenues of all facilities under the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

On December 18, 2020 and November 13, 2023, amendments became effective to the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease and Second Amended and Restated Master Lease, respectively, as described more fully in Note 1. These modifications were each accounted for as a new lease which the Company concluded continued to meet the criteria for operating lease treatment. As a result, the existing deferred revenue at the time of the amendments are being recognized over the Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease's new initial lease term, which expires in September 2038. The Company concluded the renewal options of up to an additional 20 years at the tenants' option are not reasonably certain of being exercised as failure to renew would not result in a significant penalty to the tenant. In the fifth and sixth lease years the building base rent escalates at 1.25%. In the seventh and eighth lease years it escalates at 1.75% and then escalates at 2% in the ninth lease year and each lease year thereafter. In addition, the guaranteed fixed escalations in the new initial lease term are recognized on a straight line basis.

The Boyd Master Lease includes a fixed component, a portion of which is subject to an annual 2% escalator if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met, and a component that is based on the revenues of the facilities, which is adjusted, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of all facilities under the Boyd Master Lease during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

In May 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Belterra Park in satisfaction of the Belterra Park Loan, subject to the Belterra Park Lease with a Boyd affiliate operating the property. The Belterra Park Lease rent terms are consistent with the Boyd Master Lease. The annual rent is comprised of a fixed component, part of which is subject to an annual escalator of up to 2% if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds are met and a component that is based on the revenues of the facilities which is adjusted, every two years to an amount equal to 4% of the average annual net revenues of Belterra Park during the preceding two years in excess of a contractual baseline.

On September 29, 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of Horseshoe St. Louis in satisfaction of the CZR loan, subject to the Horseshoe St. Louis Lease, the initial term of which expires on October 31, 2033, with 4 separate renewal options of 5 years each, exercisable at the tenants' option. The Horseshoe St. Louis Lease's rent terms were adjusted on December 1, 2021 such that the annual escalator is now fixed at 1.25% for the second through fifth lease years, increasing to 1.75% for the sixth and seventh lease years and thereafter increasing by 2.0% for the remainder of the lease.

The Meadows Lease contained a fixed component, subject to annual escalators, and a component that was based on the revenues of the facility, which was reset every two years to an amount determined by multiplying (i) 4% by (ii) the average annual net revenues of the facility for the trailing two-year period. The Meadows Lease contained an annual escalator provision for up to 5% of the base rent, if certain rent coverage ratio thresholds were met, which remained at 5% until the earlier of ten years or the year in which total rent was $31.0 million, at which point the escalator was to be reduced to 2% annually thereafter. The Meadows Lease was terminated during 2023 and the real estate associated with the property became part of the PENN 2023 Master Lease.

The Morgantown Lease became effective on October 1, 2020 whereby the Company is leasing the land under PENN's gaming facility under construction for an initial cash rent of $3.0 million, provided, however, that (i) in lease years two and three rent increased by 1.5% annually (and on a prorated basis for the remainder of the lease year in which the gaming facility

/96

opened) and (ii) commencing on the fourth anniversary of the opening date and for each anniversary thereafter, (a) if the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and (b) if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year.

Rent under the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease increases annually by 0.5% lease years two through six. Beginning with the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.25% then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. Additionally, the Company's landside development project at Casino Queen Baton Rouge was completed in late August 2023 and the rent was adjusted upon opening to reflect a yield of 8.25% on GLPI's project costs of $77 million. The Company also acquired the land and certain improvements at Casino Queen Marquette for $32.72 million as of September 6, 2023. The annual rent on the Third Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease was increased by $2.7 million for this acquisition. Additionally, the Company anticipates funding certain construction costs for an amount not to exceed $12.5 million, for a landside development project at Casino Queen Marquette that is expected to be completed by December 31, 2024. The rent will be adjusted to reflect a yield of 8.25% for the funded project costs.

The Perryville Lease that became effective on July 1, 2021 was subject to escalation provisions beginning in the second lease year through the fourth lease year and increasing by 1.50% during such period and then increasing by 1.25% for the remaining lease term. The escalation provisions beginning in the fifth lease year were subject to the CPI being at least 0.5% for the preceding lease year. The Perryville Lease was terminated during 2023, and the real estate associated with the property became part of the PENN 2023 Master Lease.

The Bally's Master Lease became effective on June 3, 2021 and rent is subject to contractual escalations based on the CPI, with a 1% floor and 2% ceiling, subject to the CPI meeting a 0.5% threshold. On April 1, 2022 and January 3, 2023, the Company completed acquisitions of the real estate assets of Bally's Biloxi, Bally's Tiverton, Bally's Black Hawk, and Bally's Quad Cities. These properties were added to the existing Bally's Master Lease with annual rent increases subject to the escalation clauses described above.

On December 29, 2021, the Maryland Live! Lease with Cordish became effective, with annual rent increasing by 1.75% upon the second anniversary of the lease commencement. The Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease with Cordish became effective March 1, 2022 with annual rent also increasing by 1.75% upon the second anniversary of the lease commencement. These leases were accounted for as an Investment in leases, financing receivables. See Note 7 for the further information including the future annual cash payments to be received under these leases.

On August 29, 2023, the Company acquired the land associated with a development project in Rockford, IL. Simultaneously with the land acquisition, GLPI entered into the Rockford Lease which has a 99 year term and the initial annual rent is subject to fixed 2% annual escalation beginning with the lease's first anniversary and for the entirety of its term.

Furthermore, the Company's master leases that contain variable rent provide for a floor on such rent, should the Company's tenants acquire or commence operating a competing facility within a restricted area (typically 60 miles from a property under the existing master lease with such tenant). These clauses provide landlord protections by basing the percentage rent floor for any affected facility on the net revenues of such facility for the calendar year immediately preceding the year in which the competing facility is acquired or first operated by the tenant. A percentage rent floor was triggered on the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease on the Bossier City Boomtown property due to PENN's acquisition of Margaritaville Resort Casino. Additionally, a percentage rent floor on the Amended PENN Master Lease was triggered on the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course in connection with PENN opening a facility in York, Pennsylvania, which went into effect at the November 1, 2023 reset.

Costs

/97

(other than taxes on the income of the lessor) and (4) all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties.

Lease terms

Under ASC 842, the Company is required at lease inception (and if applicable at a lease reassessment date) to determine the term of the lease. This requires concluding whether it is reasonably assured that our tenants will exercise their renewal options contained within the lease. The initial lease term is a key judgment that is utilized in the lease classification test to determine whether the lease is an operating lease, sales type lease or direct financing lease. We currently have not included tenant renewal options in our determination of the initial lease term. We assess whether to include tenant renewal options in our calculation of the lease term based on several factors, including but not limited to, whether our tenants' leases represent substantially all of the tenants' earnings and revenues, the ability of our tenants to sell their leased operations for fair value and whether the initial term of our leases is for a significant period of time. Since the formation of the Company on November 1, 2013, the Company has amended or reassessed seven of its fourteen current leases. All of these reassessments were the result of significant lease amendments and were completed during the initial lease terms and prior to any renewal options. Additionally, Pinnacle sold its operations to PENN for fair value whose underlying real estate for the casino operations were leased from the Company. Described below are our lease term assessments in connection with recent lease reassessment events or at lease inception for certain of the Company's tenant leases.

The Amended PENN Master Lease and the PENN 2023 Master Lease became effective January 1, 2023. The Company concluded that the lease term for both of these leases should end at the current lease expiration date of October 31, 2033 and not include any of the three remaining renewal terms of 5 years each due to the factors described above. The Company concluded that each individual lease component within the Amended PENN Master Lease and the PENN 2023 Master Lease meets the definition of an operating lease. The deferred rent and contractual fixed minimum lease payments at January 1, 2023 are being recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term expiration date of October 31, 2033 for both master leases.

In addition, during 2022, the Original PENN Master Lease required an accounting reassessment due to a lease amendment resulting in a lease modification for accounting purposes. The Company concluded the lease term should end at the current lease expiration date of October 31, 2033 and not include any of the three remaining renewal terms of 5 years each. This was due to the factors described above, and the fact that PENN has significantly diversified its earnings stream since the inception of the Original PENN Master Lease such that the leased operations in the Original PENN Master Lease no longer represented substantially all of PENN's revenues and earnings. We believe all these factors precluded the Company from concluding all renewal periods were reasonably assured to be exercised in the Original PENN Master Lease. It should be noted that several of these factors were not present in 2013 when this lease began and, therefore, resulted in a change in the determination of the lease term.

The Second Amended and Restated Casino Queen Master Lease became effective December 17, 2021 and required an accounting reassessment due to changes in the rent and lease terms. The Company concluded the lease term is limited to its initial 15 year term. This was due to the factors discussed above as well as due to additional competitive threats that have emerged in the regional markets for the properties in the lease that were not present previously, particularly in the state of Illinois with respect to additional competitive pressures from video gaming terminals that took market share from land-based casinos. It should be noted that several of these factors were not present in 2013 when this lease began and, therefore, resulted in a change in the determination of the lease term.

/98

Details of the Company's rental income for the year ended December 31, 2023 was as follows (in thousands):


	Year Ended December 31, 2023
Building base rent	1,103,493
Land base rent	168,058
Percentage rent and other rental revenue	70,472
Interest income on real estate loans	1,044
Total cash income	$	1,343,067
Straight-line rent adjustments	39,881
Ground rent in revenue	34,388
Accretion on financing receivables	23,056
Total income from real estate	$	1,440,392

(1) Building base rent is subject to the annual rent escalators described above.

As of December 31, 2023, the future minimum rental income from the Company's rental properties under non-cancelable operating leases, including any reasonably assured renewal periods, was as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,	Future Rental Payments Receivable		Straight-Line Rent Adjustments		Future Base Ground Rents Receivable		Future Income to be Recognized Related to Operating Leases
2024	$	1,202,763	$	62,493	$	13,001	$	1,278,257
2025	1,194,550		57,338		13,001		1,264,889
2026	1,135,624		50,039		12,174		1,197,837
2027	1,109,182		43,250		11,296		1,163,728
2028	1,111,327		36,361		11,178		1,158,866
Thereafter	5,880,255		35,412		55,976		5,971,643
Total	$	11,633,701	$	284,893	$	116,626	$	12,035,220

The table above presents the cash rent the Company expects to receive from its tenants, offset by adjustments to recognize this rent on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company also includes the future non-cash revenue it expects to recognize from the fixed portion of tenant paid ground leases in the table above. For further details on these tenant paid ground leases, refer to Note 8.

The Company may periodically loan funds to casino owner-operators for the purchase of real estate. Interest income related to real estate loans is recorded as revenue from real estate within the Company's consolidated statements of income in the period earned. See Note 5 for further details.

Gaming, Food, Beverage and Other Revenues

Prior to the sale of operations of the TRS Properties in 2021, gaming revenue generated by the TRS Properties mainly consisted of revenue from slot machines, and to a lesser extent, table game and poker revenue. Gaming revenue was recognized net of certain sales incentives, including promotional allowances in accordance with ASC 606. The Company also deferred a portion of the revenue received from customers (who participated in the points-based loyalty programs) at the time of play until a later period when the points were redeemed or forfeited. Other revenues at our TRS Properties were derived from our dining, retail and certain other ancillary activities. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized gaming, food, beverage and other revenue of $109.7 million.

/99

13. Stock-Based Compensation

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 1,934,142 shares available for future issuance under the Amended 2013 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2013 Plan"). The 2013 Plan provides for the Company to issue restricted stock awards, including performance-based restricted stock awards and other equity or cash based awards to employees. Any director, employee or consultant shall be eligible to receive such awards. The Company issues new authorized common shares to satisfy stock option exercises and restricted stock award releases.

As of December 31, 2023, there was $4.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost for restricted stock awards that will be recognized over the grants' remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.69 years. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized $8.5 million, $7.9 million and $7.2 million, respectively, of compensation expense associated with these awards. The total fair value of awards released during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was $11.3 million, $12.0 million and $9.9 million, respectively.

The following table contains information on restricted stock award activity for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:


	Number of Award Shares	Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2021	254,664	$	41.10
Granted	238,013	$	35.58
Released	(244,426)	$	31.06
Canceled	(1,200)	$	45.64
Outstanding at December 31, 2022	247,051	$	45.68
Granted	243,291	$	38.01
Released	(220,413)	$	32.54

Outstanding at December 31, 2023	269,929	$	49.49

Performance-based restricted stock awards have a three-year cliff vesting with the amount of restricted shares vesting at the end of the three-year period determined based upon the Company’s performance as measured against its peers. More specifically, the percentage of shares vesting at the end of the measurement period will be based on the Company’s three-year total shareholder return measured against the three-year total shareholder return of the companies included in the MSCI US REIT index and the Company's stock performance ranking among a group of triple-net REIT peer companies. As of December 31, 2023, there was $16.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost for performance-based restricted stock awards, which will be recognized over the awards' remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.69 years. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized $14.4 million, $12.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively, of compensation expense associated with these awards. The total fair value of performance-based stock awards released during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 was $21.7 million, $18.5 million, and $14.9 million respectively.

/100

The following table contains information on performance-based restricted stock award activity for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:


	Number of Performance-Based Award Shares	Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2021	1,305,106	$	22.27
Granted	500,000	$	30.59
Released	(380,070)	$	17.85
Canceled	(30,816)	$	17.85
Outstanding at December 31, 2022	1,394,220	26.55
Granted	514,000	$	32.32
Released	(416,220)	$	23.62

Outstanding at December 31, 2023	1,492,000	29.36

14. Income Taxes

The Company elected on its U.S. federal income tax return for its taxable year that began on January 1, 2014 to be treated as a REIT and GLPI, together with its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, GLP Holdings, Inc., jointly elected to treat each of GLP Holdings, Inc. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge) and Penn Cecil Maryland, Inc. (d/b/a Hollywood Casino Perryville) as a TRS effective on the first day of the first taxable year of GLPI as a REIT. The benefits of the intended REIT conversion on the Company's tax provision and effective income tax rate are reflected in the tables below. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the corporate tax rate was permanently lowered from the previous maximum rate of 35% to 21%, effective for tax years including or commencing January 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2022, the Company no longer has activity in its TRS nor does it have deferred tax assets.

The provision for income taxes charged to operations for years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was as follows:


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Current tax expense
Federal	$	—	$	14,653	$	16,363
State	1,997		2,402		6,653
Total current	1,997		17,055		23,016
Deferred tax (benefit) expense
Federal	—		—		3,534
State	—		—		1,792
Total deferred	—		—		5,326
Total provision	$	1,997	$	17,055	$	28,342

/101

The following tables reconcile the statutory federal income tax rate to the actual effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021
Percent of pretax income
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate	21.0	%	21.0	%	21.0	%
Deferred tax impact of TRS tax-free liquidation	—	%	—	%	2.3	%
State and local income taxes	0.3	%	0.4	%	0.7	%
Valuation allowance	—	%	(0.5)	%	0.3	%

REIT conversion benefit	(21.0)	%	(19.2)	%	(19.3)	%
Permanent differences	—	%	0.7	%	—	%
Other miscellaneous items	—	%	—	%	—	%
	0.3	%	2.4	%	5.0	%


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Amount based upon pretax income
U.S. federal statutory income tax	$	159,047	$	151,271	$	118,110
Deferred tax impact of TRS tax-free liquidation	—		—		13,036
State and local income taxes	1,997		2,402		3,763
Valuation allowance	—		(3,489)		1,758

REIT conversion benefit	(159,047)		(138,151)		(108,315)

Permanent differences	—		5,006		11
Other miscellaneous items	—		16		(21)
	$	1,997	$	17,055	$	28,342

The Company is still subject to federal income tax examinations for its years ended December 31, 2020 and forward.

15. Earnings Per Share

The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic EPS to the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023	2022	2021
	(in thousands)
Determination of shares:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	264,053	252,716	235,472

Assumed conversion of restricted stock awards	156	159	153
Assumed conversion of performance-based restricted stock awards	784	971	606
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	264,993	253,846	236,231

/102

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023		2022		2021
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Calculation of basic EPS:


Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	734,283	$	684,653	$	534,047
Less: Net income allocated to participating securities	(434)		(432)		(346)
Net income for earnings per share purposes	$	733,849	$	684,221	$	533,701
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	264,053		252,716		235,472
Basic EPS	$	2.78	$	2.71	$	2.27

Calculation of diluted EPS:
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	734,283	$	684,653	$	534,047
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	264,993		253,846		236,231
Diluted EPS	$	2.77	$	2.70	$	2.26

Antidilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share	103		—		70

16. Equity

Common Stock

On December 21, 2022, the Company commenced a continuous equity offering under which the Company may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of its common stock from time to time through a sales agent in "at the market" offerings (the "2022 ATM Program"). Actual sales will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, the trading price of the Company's common stock and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding. The Company may sell the shares in amounts and at times to be determined by the Company, but has no obligation to sell any of the shares in the 2022 ATM Program. The 2022 ATM Program also allows the Company to enter into forward sale agreements. In no event will the aggregate number of shares sold under the 2022 ATM Program (whether under any forward sale agreement or through a sales agent), have an aggregate sales price in excess of $1.0 billion. The Company expects, that if it enters into a forward sale contract, to physically settle each forward sale agreement with the forward purchaser on one or more dates specified by the Company prior to the maturity date of that particular forward sale agreement, in which case the aggregate net cash proceeds at settlement will equal the number of shares underlying the particular forward sale agreement multiplied by the relevant forward sale price. However, the Company may also elect to cash settle or net share settle a particular forward sale agreement, in which case proceeds may or may not be received or cash may be owed to the forward purchaser.

In connection with the 2022 ATM Program, the Company engaged a sales agent who may receive compensation of up to 2% of the gross sales price of the shares sold. Similarly, in the event the Company enters into a forward sale agreement, it will pay the relevant forward seller a commission of up to 2% of the sales price of all borrowed shares of common stock sold during the applicable selling period of the forward sale agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company sold 8.5 million shares of its common stock under the 2022 ATM Program which raised net proceeds of $404.7 million. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $593.6 million remaining for issuance under the 2022 ATM Program.

On August 14, 2019, the Company commenced a continuous equity offering under which the Company may sell up to an aggregate of $600 million of its common stock from time to time through a sales agent in "at the market" offerings (the "2019 ATM Program").

In August 2022, the Company entered into a forward sale agreement under the Company's 2019 ATM program that was settled in February 2023 which resulted in the issuance of 1,284,556 common shares and net proceeds of $64.6 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, GLPI sold 5,206,499 of its common stock at an average price of $50.32 per share under the 2019 ATM Program, which generated net proceeds of approximately $260.8 million. In November 2022, the Company exhausted the capacity under its 2019 ATM Program..

/103

On July 1, 2022, the Company issued 7,935,000 shares of its common stock, generating net proceeds of approximately

$350.8 million.

During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company issued 8.9 million shares at $44.24 per share of common stock to partially finance the funding required for the Cordish transactions. See Note 6 for further details.

Noncontrolling Interests

As partial consideration for the closing of the real property assets under the Bally's Master Lease that occurred on January 3, 2023, the Company's operating partnership issued 286,643 newly-issued OP Units to affiliates of Bally's which were valued at $14.9 million. In the prior year, as partial consideration for the closing of the real property assets under the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease that occurred on March 1, 2022, the Company's operating partnership issued 3,017,909 newly-issued OP Units to affiliates of Cordish which were valued at $137.0 million. The OP Units are exchangeable for common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2023, the Company holds a 97.3% controlling financial interest in the operating partnership. The operating partnership is a VIE in which the Company is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the partnership's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Therefore, the Company consolidates the accounts of the operating partnership, and reflects the third party ownership in this entity as a non-controlling interest in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company paid $24.1 million and $20.7 million in distributions to the non-controlling interest holders concurrently with the dividends paid to the Company's common shareholders, during the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

/104

Dividends

The following table lists the regular dividends declared and paid by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:


Declaration Date	Shareholder Record Date	Securities Class	Dividend Per Share		Period Covered	Distribution Date	Dividend Amount
							(in thousands)
2023
February 22, 2023	March 10, 2023	Common Stock	$	0.72	First Quarter 2023	March 24, 2023	$	188,896
February 22, 2023	March 10, 2023	Common Stock	$	0.25	First Quarter 2023	March 24, 2023 (1)	$	65,588
June 1, 2023	June 16, 2023	Common Stock	$	0.72	Second Quarter 2023	June 30, 2023	$	189,095
August 30, 2023	September 15, 2023	Common Stock	$	0.73	Third Quarter 2023	September 29, 2023	$	192,085
November 22, 2023	December 8, 2023	Common Stock	$	0.73	Fourth Quarter 2023	December 22, 2023	$	197,384

2022
February 24, 2022	March 11, 2022	Common Stock	$	0.69	First Quarter 2022	March 25, 2022	$	170,805
May 9, 2022	June 10, 2022	Common Stock	$	0.705	Second Quarter 2022	June 24, 2022	$	174,519
August 31, 2022	September 16, 2022	Common Stock	$	0.705	Third Quarter 2022	September 30, 2022	$	181,549
November 23, 2022	December 9, 2022	Common Stock	$	0.705	Fourth Quarter 2022	December 23, 2022	$	183,813

2021
February 22, 2021	March 9, 2021	Common Stock	$	0.65	First Quarter 2021	March 23, 2021	$	151,308
May 20, 2021	June 11, 2021	Common Stock	$	0.67	Second Quarter 2021	June 25, 2021	$	156,876
August 27, 2021	September 10, 2021	Common Stock	$	0.67	Third Quarter 2021	September 24, 2021	$	159,426
November 29, 2021	December 9, 2021	Common Stock	$	0.67	Fourth Quarter 2021	December 23, 2021	$	165,628
December 17, 2021	December 27, 2021	Common Stock	$	0.24	Fourth Quarter 2021	January 7, 2022 (2)	$	59,330

(1) On February 22, 2023, the Company declared a first quarter dividend of $0.72 per share in addition to a special earnings and profit dividend related to the sale of the Tropicana Las Vegas building of $0.25 per share on the Company's common stock.

(2) On December 17, 2021, the Company declared a special earnings and profits dividend related to the sale of the operations at Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge of $0.24 per share on the Company's common stock. The dividend was accrued in 2021 and paid on January 7, 2022. In addition, dividend payments of $61 thousand were made to GLPI restricted stock award holders.

In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, dividend payments were made to GLPI restricted stock award holders in the amount of, $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

/105

A summary of the Company's taxable common stock distributions for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows (unaudited):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023			2022			2021
	(in dollars per share)
Qualified dividends	$	—		$	—		$	0.22552
Non-qualified dividends	3.0215			2.5686			2.58944
Capital gains	0.0004			0.2773			0.01199
Non-taxable return of capital	0.1281			—			0.03215
Total distributions per common share (1)	$	3.15		$	2.85		$	2.86

Percentage classified as qualified dividends	—		%	—		%	7.89		%
Percentage classified as non-qualified dividends	95.92		%	90.26		%	90.57		%
Percentage classified as capital gains	0.01		%	9.74		%	0.42		%
Percentage classified as non-taxable return of capital	4.07		%	—		%	1.12		%
	100.00		%	100.00		%	100.00		%

(1) A portion of the $0.24 dividend declared on December 27, 2021 and paid on January 7, 2022 is treated as a 2022 distribution and a portion is treated as a 2021 distribution for federal income tax purposes.

17. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information and Noncash Activities

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information are as follows:


Year ended December 31,	2023		2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received	$	1,845	$	21,189	$	17,499
Cash paid for interest	309,924		286,043		273,482

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities

On January 3, 2023, as part of the consideration for the land and real estate assets of Bally's Biloxi and Bally's

Tiverton, the Company issued 286,643 OP Units to affiliates of Bally's that were valued at $14.9 million for accounting

purposes at closing. The Company also recognized a right of use asset and liability of $37.1 million on a ground lease which was subsequently remeasured due to a renegotiation and reduced the right of use asset and lease liability to $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. On March 1, 2022, as part of the consideration for the real estate assets acquired pursuant to the Pennsylvania Live! Master Lease, the Company issued 3,017,909 OP Units that were valued at $137.0 million and assumed debt of $422.9 million that was repaid after closing with the offsetting increase to Investment in leases, financing receivables, net.

On December 29, 2021, as part of the consideration for the real estate assets of Live! Casino & Hotel Maryland, the Company issued 4.35 million OP Units that were valued at $205.1 million and assumed debt of $363.3 million that was repaid after closing. The Company also recorded a $53.3 million increase to lease liabilities for a right of use liability associated with a land lease with an increase to Investment in leases, financing receivables in connection with the transaction. In connection with the June 3, 2021 transaction with Bally's the Company recorded a $36.4 million increase to right of use assets and land rights, net and lease liabilities for a right of use liability associated with a land lease.

As described in Note 1, during the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold the operations of Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge and leased the underlying real estate to third party operators. This resulted in the reclassification of $67.1 million of net assets from property, plant and equipment used in operations to real estate investments, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

/106

As previously discussed, the Company declared a dividend on December 27, 2021, totaling $59.3 million, that was paid on January 7, 2022 and that was accrued at December 31, 2021. Finally, see Note 16 for a description of the stock dividend that was distributed in 2020. The Company did not engage in any other noncash investing and financing activities during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

18. Subsequent Events

On February 6, 2024, the Company announced it had acquired the real estate assets of Tioga Downs Casino Resort ("Tioga Downs") in Nichols, NY from American Racing & Entertainment, LLC ("American Racing") for $175.0 million. Simultaneous with the acquisition, GLPI and American Racing entered into a triple-net master lease agreement for an initial 30 year term. The initial annual rent is $14.5 million and is subject to annual fixed escalations of 1.75% beginning with the first anniversary which increases to 2% beginning in year fifteen of the lease through the remainder of its term. The initial annualized rent coverage ratio for the lease is expected to be over 2.3x.

Tioga Downs features a 32,600 square foot gaming floor with 895 slots and 29 table games, a 2,500 square foot FanDuel sports book, a 160 room hotel, 5/8-mile harness horse track, 7 food and beverage locations, and a separate 18-hole championship golf course. The property underwent a $130 million expansion beginning in 2016 after it was awarded a Class III casino license by the State of New York.

/107

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2023

(in thousands)


				Initial Cost to Company				Net Capitalized Costs (Retirements) Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at which Carried at Close of Period										Life on which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
																		Original Date of Construction / Renovation
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Improvements		Buildings and Improvements				Land and Improvements		Buildings and Improvements		Total (8)		Accumulated Depreciation			Date Acquired
Rental Properties:
Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg	Lawrenceburg, IN	$	—	$	15,251	$	342,393	$	(30)	$	15,221	$	342,393	$	357,614	$	202,387	1997/2009	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino Aurora (1)	Aurora, IL	—		4,937		98,378		8,311		13,630		97,996		111,626		87,848		1993/2002/ 2012	11/1/2013	22
Hollywood Casino Joliet (1)	Joliet, IL	—		19,214		101,104		7,610		26,824		101,104		127,928		84,585		1992/2003/ 2010	11/1/2013	20
Argosy Casino Alton	Alton, IL	—		—		6,462		—		—		6,462		6,462		5,167		1991/1999	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino Toledo	Toledo, OH	—		12,003		144,093		(201)		11,802		144,093		155,895		61,186		2012	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino Columbus	Columbus, OH	—		38,240		188,543		105		38,266		188,622		226,888		82,386		2012	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races	Charles Town, WV	—		35,102		233,069		—		35,102		233,069		268,171		169,725		1997/2010	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course	Grantville, PA	—		25,500		161,810		—		25,500		161,810		187,310		107,120		2008/2010	11/1/2013	31
M Resort	Henderson, NV	—		66,104		126,689		(436)		65,668		126,689		192,357		59,320		2009/2012	11/1/2013	30
Hollywood Casino Bangor	Bangor, ME	—		12,883		84,257		—		12,883		84,257		97,140		47,148		2008/2012	11/1/2013	31
Zia Park Casino	Hobbs, NM	—		9,313		38,947		—		9,313		38,947		48,260		27,653		2005	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast	Bay St. Louis, MS	—		59,388		87,352		(229)		59,176		87,335		146,511		64,284		1992/2006/ 2011	11/1/2013	40
Argosy Casino Riverside	Riverside, MO	—		23,468		143,301		(77)		23,391		143,301		166,692		85,742		1994/2007	11/1/2013	37
Hollywood Casino Tunica	Tunica, MS	—		4,634		42,031		—		4,634		42,031		46,665		33,496		1994/2012	11/1/2013	31
Boomtown Biloxi	Biloxi, MS	—		3,423		63,083		(137)		3,286		63,083		66,369		56,507		1994/2006	11/1/2013	15
Hollywood Casino St. Louis	Maryland Heights, MO	—		44,198		177,063		(3,239)		40,959		177,063		218,022		134,225		1997/2013	11/1/2013	13
Hollywood Casino at Dayton Raceway	Dayton, OH	—		3,211		—		86,288		3,211		86,288		89,499		26,082		2014	11/1/2013	31
Hollywood Casino at Mahoning Valley Race Track	Youngstown, OH	—		5,683		—		94,314		5,833		94,164		99,997		28,256		2014	11/1/2013	31
Resorts Casino Tunica	Tunica, MS	—		—		12,860		(12,860)		—		—		—		—		1994/1996/ 2005/2014	5/1/2017	N/A
1st Jackpot Casino	Tunica, MS	—		161		10,100		—		161		10,100		10,261		2,478		1995	5/1/2017	31
Ameristar Black Hawk	Black Hawk, CO	—		243,092		334,024		25		243,117		334,024		577,141		58,694		2000	4/28/2016	31
Ameristar East Chicago	East Chicago, IN	—		4,198		123,430		—		4,198		123,430		127,628		24,784		1997	4/28/2016	31
Belterra Casino Resort	Florence, IN	—		63,420		172,876		—		63,420		172,876		236,296		34,388		2000	4/28/2016	31
Ameristar Council Bluffs	Council Bluffs, IA	—		84,009		109,027		—		84,009		109,027		193,036		21,430		1996	4/28/2016	31
L'Auberge Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	—		205,274		178,426		—		205,274		178,426		383,700		33,392		2012	4/28/2016	31
Boomtown Bossier City	Bossier City, LA	—		79,022		107,067		—		79,022		107,067		186,089		19,785		2002	4/28/2016	31
L'Auberge Lake Charles	Lake Charles, LA	—		14,831		310,877		(92)		14,739		310,877		325,616		62,244		2005	4/28/2016	31

/108


Boomtown New Orleans	Boomtown, LA	—		46,019		58,258		—		46,019		58,258		104,277		12,259		1994	4/28/2016	31
Ameristar Vicksburg	Vicksburg, MS	—		128,068		96,106		—		128,068		96,106		224,174		24,270		1994	4/28/2016	31
River City Casino & Hotel	St Louis, MO	—		8,117		221,038		—		8,117		221,038		229,155		42,777		2010	4/28/2016	31
Ameristar Kansas City	Kansas City, MO	—		239,111		271,598		—		239,111		271,598		510,709		58,709		1997	4/28/2016	31
Ameristar St. Charles	St. Charles, MO	—		375,597		437,908		—		375,596		437,908		813,504		78,537		1994	4/28/2016	31
Jackpot Properties	Jackpot, NV	—		48,784		61,550		—		48,784		61,550		110,334		14,648		1954	4/28/2016	31
Plainridge Park Casino	Plainridge, MA	—		127,068		123,850		—		127,068		123,850		250,918		20,808		2015	10/15/2018	31
Belterra Park Gaming and Entertainment Center (2)	Cincinnati, OH	—		11,689		45,995		—		11,689		45,995		57,684		8,128		2013	5/6/2020	31
The Meadows Racetrack and Casino	Washington, PA	—		181,532		141,370		(2,864)		179,598		140,440		320,038		40,388		2006	9/9/2016	31
DraftKings at Casino Queen	East St. Louis, IL	—		70,716		70,014		8,700		70,716		78,714		149,430		26,255		1999	1/23/2014	31
Tropicana Atlantic City	Atlantic City, NJ	—		166,974		392,923		—		166,974		392,923		559,897		66,086		1981	10/1/2018	31
Tropicana Evansville (3)	Evansville, IN	—		47,439		146,930		(194,369)		—		—		—		—		1995	10/1/2018	N/A
Tropicana Evansville-Bally's	Evansville, IN	—		120,473		153,130		—		120,473		153,130		273,603		13,135		1995	6/3/2021	31
Tropicana Laughlin	Laughlin, NV	—		20,671		80,530		—		20,671		80,530		101,201		15,160		1988	10/1/2018	27
Trop Casino Greenville	Greenville, MS	—		—		21,680		—		—		21,680		21,680		3,642		2012	10/1/2018	31
Belle of Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	—		11,873		52,400		1,819		13,072		53,020		66,092		10,396		1994	10/1/2018	31
Isle Casino Waterloo (3)	Waterloo, IA	—		64,263		77,958		—		64,263		77,958		142,221		7,649		2005	12/18/2020	31
Isle Casino Bettendorf (3)	Bettendorf, IA	—		29,636		85,150		—		29,636		85,150		114,786		8,355		2015	12/18/2020	31
Horseshoe St. Louis (2)	St Louis, MO	—		26,930		219,070		—		26,930		219,070		246,000		24,277		2005	10/1/2020	31
Hollywood Casino Morgantown (4)	Morgantown, PA	—		30,253		—		—		30,253		—		30,253		—		2020	10/1/2020	N/A
Hollywood Casino Perryville	Perryville, MD	—		23,266		31,079		—		23,266		31,079		54,345		19,403		2010	07/1/2021	31
Bally's Dover Casino Resort	Dover, DE	—		99,106		48,300		—		99,106		48,300		147,406		15,625		1995	06/3/2021	31
Casino Queen Baton Rouge	Baton Rouge, LA	—		7,320		40,812		72,683		7,320		113,495		120,815		27,820		1994	12/17/2021	31
Tropicana Las Vegas (7)	Las Vegas NV	—		226,160		—		—		226,160		—		226,160		—		1955	04/16/2020	N/A
Bally's Black Hawk	Black Hawk, CO	—		17,537		13,730		—		17,537		13,730		31,267		915		1991	04/01/2022	27
Bally's Quad Cities Casino & Hotel	Rock Island, IL	—		36,848		82,010		—		36,848		82,010		118,858		6,113		2007	04/01/2022	31
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino	Biloxi, MS	—		204,533		195,950		—		204,533		195,950		400,483		6,461		2005	01/03/2023	31
Bally's Tiverton Hotel & Casino	Tiverton, RI	—		116,622		110,150		—		116,622		110,150		226,772		4,073		2017	01/03/2023	31
Casino Queen Marquette	Marquette, IA	—		32,032		690		—		32,032		690		32,722		56		2000	09/06/2023	6
		—		3,595,196		6,677,441		65,321		3,559,101		6,778,856		10,337,957		2,176,257
Headquarters Property:
GLPI Corporate Office (5)	Wyomissing, PA	—		750		8,465		142		750		8,608		9,358		2,266		2014/2015	9/19/2014	31
Other Properties
Other owned land (6)	various	—		6,798		—		(6,798)		—		—		—		—
		$	—	$	3,602,744	$	6,685,906	$	58,665	$	3,559,851	$	6,787,464	$	10,347,315	$	2,178,523

(1) In connection with the funding agreement with PENN, new facilities are being developed for the relocation of PENN's riverboat casino in Aurora and PENN is also in the process of relocating its Hollywood Casino Joliet operations. The Company accelerated the lives of its depreciable assets at the two existing locations to coincide with the expected opening dates of the new facilities.

(2) During 2020, the Company acquired the real estate of both of these properties in satisfaction of previously outstanding loans, subject to the Belterra Park Lease and the Horseshoe St. Louis Lease, respectively.

/109

(3) On December 18, 2020, Caesar's elected to replace Tropicana Evansville with Isle Casino Bettendorf and Isle Casino Waterloo as allowed under the Third Amended and Restated Caesars Master Lease.

(4) On October 1, 2020, the Company and PENN closed on their previously announced transaction whereby GLPI acquired the land under PENN's gaming facility under construction in Morgantown, Pennsylvania in exchange for $30.0 million in rent credits which were fully utilized by PENN in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company is leasing the land back to an affiliate of PENN pursuant to the Morgantown Lease for an initial annual rent of $3.0 million, subject to escalation provisions following the opening of the property.

(5) The Company's corporate headquarters building was completed in October 2015. The land was purchased on September 19, 2014 and construction on the building occurred through October 2015.

(6) This includes undeveloped land the Company owns at locations other than its tenant occupied properties. The undeveloped land was sold on August 9, 2022.

(7) On April 13, 2021, Bally’s agreed to acquire both GLPI’s non-land real estate assets and PENN's outstanding equity interests in Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and

Casino, Inc. This deal closed on September 26, 2022.

(8) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of the properties listed above was $9.90 billion at December 31, 2023. This amount does not include the real estate part of Investment in Financing Lease, net.

/110

A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023		2022		2021
Real Estate:	(in thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	9,626,018	$	9,458,918	$	8,698,098
Acquisitions	678,130		150,126		749,671
Construction in progress	—		23,864		5,699
Capital expenditures and assets placed in service	43,167		—		8,700
Dispositions	—		(6,890)		(3,250)
Balance at the end of the period	$	10,347,315	$	9,626,018	$	9,458,918
Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	(1,918,083)	$	(1,681,367)	$	(1,410,940)
Depreciation expense	(260,440)		(236,809)		(230,941)
Additions (1)	—		—		(39,909)
Dispositions	—		93		423
Balance at the end of the period	$	(2,178,523)	$	(1,918,083)	$	(1,681,367)

(1) Represents accumulated depreciation on real estate assets of Hollywood Casino Perryville and Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge which were leased to third parties during 2021. See Note 6 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

/111

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of December 31, 2023, which is the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of December 31, 2023 the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company's management conducted an assessment of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and concluded it was effective as of December 31, 2023. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013).

Deloitte & Touche LLP (PCAOB ID No. 34), the Company's independent registered accounting firm, issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, which is included on the following page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2023, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/112

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

February 27, 2024

/113

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

/114

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item concerning directors is hereby incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "2024 Proxy Statement"), to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Information required by this item concerning executive officers is included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information called for in this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the 2024 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS

The information called for in this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the 2024 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information called for in this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the 2024 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information called for in this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the 2024 Proxy Statement.

/115

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

(a) 1. Financial Statements. The following is a list of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and supplementary data filed as part of Item 8 hereof:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

2. Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule III. Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2023

3. Exhibits, Including Those Incorporated by Reference.

The exhibits to this Report are listed on the accompanying index to exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference or are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

/116

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit						Description of Exhibit
2.1						Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated November 1, 2013, by and between Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2013).

2.2						Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated April 28, 2016, by and between PNK Entertainment, Inc., Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and solely with respect to Article VIII, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016).

3.1						Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2018).

3.2						Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2023).

4.1						Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2013, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2013).

4.2						First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2016, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as Issuers and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2016).

4.3						Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2016, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc, as Parent Guarantor and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016).

4.4						Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2016, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. as Parent Guarantor and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016).

4.5						Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 21, 2018, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the Issuers' 4.375% Senior Notes due 2018. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

4.6						Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 21, 2018, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the Issuers' 5.250% Senior Notes due 2025. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

4.7						Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 21, 2018, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the Issuers' 5.750% Senior Notes due 2028. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

4.8						Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2018, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc. as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the Issuers' 5.300% Senior Notes due 2029. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2018).

4.9						Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 29, 2019, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as parent guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the issuers’ 3.350% Senior Notes due 2024. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2019).

/117


4.10						Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 29, 2019, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as parent guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the issuers’ 4.000% Senior Notes due 2030. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2019).

4.11						Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2020, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2020).

4.12						Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 13, 2021, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. as Parent Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2021).

4.13						Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2023, among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., as Issuers, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2023).

4.14						Form of 2026 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 and included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016).

4.15						Form of 2025 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 and included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

4.16						Form of 2028 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 and included in Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

4.17						Form of 2029 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 and included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2018).

4.18						Form of 2024 Note. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 and included in Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2019).

4.19						Form of 2030 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 and included in Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2019).

4.20						Form of 2031 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 and included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2020).

4.21						Form of 2032 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 and included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2021).

4.22						Form of 2033 Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 and included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2023).

4.23*						Description of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

10.1						Credit Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2013, among GLP Capital, L.P., as successor-by-merger to GLP Financing, LLC, each lender from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2013).

10.2						Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 31, 2015, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and the various other parties thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on S-4 filed on August 28, 2015).

/118


10.3						First Amendment, dated as of March 25, 2016, to Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 31, 2015, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and the various other parties thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2016).

10.4						Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 21, 2018, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and the various other parties thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2018).

10.5						Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 10, 2018, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and the various other parties thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018).

10.6						Amendment No. 5, dated as of March 30, 2020, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and the various other parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2020).

10.7						Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 25, 2020, to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P., the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, as further amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2020).

10.8						Master Lease, dated November 1, 2013, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2013).

10.9						First Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2014, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2014).

10.10						Second Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2014, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2014).

10.11						Third Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2016, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2016).

10.12						Fourth Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2017, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2017).

10.13						Fifth Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2018, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2018).

10.14						Sixth Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2018, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018).

10.15						Seventh Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2018, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 13, 2019).

10.16						Eighth Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2018, by and among GLP Capital L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 13, 2019).

/119


10.17						Ninth Amendment to the Master Lease Agreement, dated as of January 14, 2022, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Com pany's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2023).

10.18						Amended and Restated Master Lease, dated February 21, 2023, by and among GLP Capital, L.P. and Penn Tenant, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 .19 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2023).

10.19						Master Lease, dated February 21, 2023, by and among GLP Capital, L.P., Penn Tenant LLC, Penn Cecil Maryland, LLC, and PNK Development 33, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2023).

10.20						Master Lease, dated April 28, 2016, by and among Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016).

10.21						First Amendment to the Master Lease, dated August 29, 2016, by and among Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2016).

10.22						Second Amendment to the Master Lease, dated October 25, 2016, by and among Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2017).

10.23						Third Amendment to the Master Lease, dated March 24, 2017, by and among Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2017).

10.24						Fourth Amendment to the Master Lease, dated October 15, 2018, by and between Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on October 16, 2018).

10.25						Fifth Amendment to the Master Lease, dated January 14, 2022, by and among Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) and Pinnacle MLS, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2023).

10.26						Master Lease Agreement, dated October 15, 2018, by and between Gold Merger Sub, LLC and Boyd TCIV, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on October 16, 2018).

10.27						Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2013, by and among Penn National Gaming, Inc. and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2013).

10.28						Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and among Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2015).

10.29 #						Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.’s Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed April 29, 2020).

10.30 #						Form of Restricted Stock Award under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued after January 1, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.31 #						Form of Restricted Stock Award under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued after January 1, 2021. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.32 #						Form of Director Restricted Stock Award with Quarterly Vesting under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued after January 1, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

/120


10.33 #						Form of Director Restricted Stock Award under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards Issued after January 1, 2022. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.34 #						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award MSCI under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued after January 1, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.35 #						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award MSCI under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards Issued after January 1, 2021. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.36 #						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award NNN under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued in 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.37 #						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award NNN under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued in 2021. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.38 #						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award NNN under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued in 2022. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.39*						Form of Restricted Stock Performance Award NNN under the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Awards issued in 2023.

10.40 #						Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Executive Change in Control and Severance Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed on February 4, 2019).

10.41						Second Amended and Restated Master Lease by and among GLP Capital, L.P., as landlord, and Tropicana Entertainment, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Country, Inc. and Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.L.C., as tenant, dated December 18, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022).

10.42						Separation Agreement dated July 27, 2020 by and between the Company and Steven T. Snyder (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2020).

10.43						Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of GLP Capital, L.P., dated as of December 29, 2021 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2021).

10.44						Credit Agreement dated as of May 13, 2022 by and among GLP Capital, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other agents and lenders party thereto from time to time (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on July 28, 2022).

10.45						Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2022, by and among GLP Capital, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2022).

10.46						Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2022, by and among GLP Capital, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2022).

19.1*						Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Policy Statement on Trading in Company Securities

21*						Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

22.1*						List of Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.

23*						Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

/121


31.1*						Principal Executive Officer Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2*						Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1*						Principal Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*						Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2022.

97.1*						Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Policy Regarding the Mandatory Recovery of Compensation

101						The following financial information from Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

104						The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.

# Compensation plans and arrangements for executives and others.

* Filed herewith.

/122

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

/s/ PETER M. CARLINO

Peter M. Carlino

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 27, 2024

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ PETER M. CARLINO

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

February 27, 2024

Peter M. Carlino

/s/ DESIREE A. BURKE

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

February 27, 2024

Desiree A. Burke

/s/ CAROL LYNTON

Director

February 27, 2024

Carol Lynton

/s/ JOSEPH W. MARSHALL

Director

February 27, 2024

Joseph W. Marshall

/s/ JAMES B. PERRY

Director

February 27, 2024

James B. Perry

/s/ BARRY F. SCHWARTZ

Director

February 27, 2024

Barry F. Schwartz

/s/ EARL C. SHANKS

Director

February 27, 2024

Earl C. Shanks

/s/ E. SCOTT URDANG

Director

February 27, 2024

E. Scott Urdang

/123

Document

Exhibit 4.23

DESCRIPTION OF GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES, INC.’S SECURITIES

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

The following is a summary of certain information concerning Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.’s (“GLPI,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The summaries and descriptions below do not purport to be complete statements of the relevant provisions of GLPI’s amended and restated articles of incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and second amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”). The summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of GLPI’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, which are included as exhibits to GLPI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, of which this exhibit is a part.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General

The Articles of Incorporation provide that GLPI may issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. No shares of our preferred stock are issued and outstanding.

The issued and outstanding shares of GLPI common stock are fully paid and nonassessable. This means the full purchase price for the outstanding shares of common stock has been paid and the holders of such shares will not be assessed any additional amounts for such shares. Any additional shares of common stock that GLPI may issue in the future will also be fully paid and nonassessable.

Dividends

Subject to prior dividend rights of the holders of any preferred stock, applicable law and the restrictions of the Articles of Incorporation on ownership and transfer of GLPI’s stock, holders of GLPI common stock will be entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by its board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.

Liquidation

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of GLPI after the satisfaction in full of the liquidation preferences of holders of any preferred stock, holders of shares of our common stock will be entitled to ratable distribution of the remaining assets available for distribution to shareholders.

Voting Rights

Subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, applicable law and restrictions of the Articles of Incorporation on ownership and transfer of GLPI’s stock, each share of common stock will be entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors, and the holders of common stock possess the exclusive voting power. Holders of shares of common stock will not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors of GLPI. Generally, all matters to be voted on by shareholders must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote at a meeting at which a quorum is present, subject to any voting rights granted to holders of any then outstanding preferred stock.

Other Rights

Holders of GLPI’s common stock do not have any preemptive, subscription, redemption, conversion or sinking fund rights with respect to the common stock, or any instruments convertible (directly or indirectly) into GLPI stock.

Subject to the restrictions of the Articles of Incorporation on ownership and transfer of GLPI’s stock, holders of shares of GLPI common stock generally will have no preference or appraisal rights. Subject to the restrictions in the Articles of Incorporation on ownership and transfer of GLPI’s stock, holders of shares of GLPI’s common stock initially will have equal dividend, liquidation and other rights.

Trading Symbol

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GLPI.”

Preferred Stock

Under the Articles of Incorporation, GLPI’s board of directors may from time to time establish and cause GLPI to issue one or more series of preferred stock and set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption of such class or series. The authority of GLPI’s board of directors with respect to each series of preferred stock includes, but is not limited to, the determination of the following:

•the designation of the series, which may be by distinguishing number, letter or title;

•the number of shares constituting such series, including the authority to increase or decrease such number (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding);

•the dividend rate of the shares of such series, whether the dividends shall be cumulative and, if so, the date from which they shall be cumulative, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of such series;

•the dates at which dividends, if any, shall be payable;

•the right, if any, of GLPI to redeem shares of such series and the terms and conditions of such redemption;

•the rights of the shares in case of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of GLPI, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of shares of such series;

•the voting power, if any, of such series and the terms and conditions under which such voting power may be exercised;

•the obligation, if any, of GLPI to retire shares of such series pursuant to a retirement or sinking fund or funds of a similar nature or otherwise and the terms and conditions of such obligations;

•the terms and conditions, if any, upon which shares of such series shall be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of stock of any other class or classes, including the price or prices or the rate or rates of conversion or exchange and the terms of adjustment, if any;

•restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of any other class or series; and

•any other rights, preferences or limitations of the shares of such series.

Accordingly, GLPI’s board of directors, without shareholder approval, may issue preferred stock with voting, conversion, or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of GLPI’s common stock. Preferred stock could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay, defer, or prevent a change of control or other corporate action, or make removal of management more difficult. Additionally, the issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of decreasing the market price of GLPI’s common stock and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of GLPI’s common stock.

Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer

In order for GLPI to qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), shares of its stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of twelve months (other than the first year for which an election to qualify to be taxed as a REIT has been made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of GLPI stock (after taking into account options to acquire shares of stock) may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities such as qualified pension plans) during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made). In addition, rent from related party tenants (generally, a tenant of a REIT owned, actually or constructively, 10% or more by the REIT, or a 10% owner of the REIT) is not qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests under the Code. To qualify to be taxed as a REIT, GLPI must satisfy other requirements as well.

The Articles of Incorporation contain restrictions on the ownership and transfer of GLPI’s stock that are intended to assist GLPI in complying with these requirements. The relevant sections of the Articles of Incorporation provide that, subject to the exceptions described below, no person or entity may own, or be deemed to own, beneficially or by virtue of the applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 7% of the outstanding shares of GLPI common stock (the “common

stock ownership limit”) or more than 7% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of GLPI stock (the “aggregate stock ownership limit”). The common stock ownership limit and the aggregate stock ownership limit are collectively referred to as the “ownership limits.” The person or entity that, but for operation of the ownership limits or another restriction on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock as described below, would beneficially own or constructively own shares of GLPI stock in violation of such limits or restrictions or, if appropriate in the context, a person or entity that would have been the record owner of such shares of GLPI stock is referred to as a “prohibited owner.”

The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause stock owned beneficially or constructively by a group of related individuals and/or entities to be owned beneficially or constructively by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 7% of the outstanding shares of GLPI common stock or less than 7% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of GLPI stock (or the acquisition by an individual or entity of an interest in an entity that owns, beneficially or constructively, shares of GLPI stock) could, nevertheless, cause that individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to own beneficially or constructively shares of GLPI stock in excess of the ownership limits. In addition, a person that did not acquire more than 7% of our outstanding stock may become subject to these restrictions if repurchases by us cause such person’s holdings to exceed 7% of our outstanding stock.

Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, GLPI’s board of directors may exempt, prospectively or retroactively, a particular shareholder (the “excepted holder”) from the ownership limits or establish a different limit on ownership (the “excepted holder limit”) if:

•no individual’s beneficial or constructive ownership of GLPI stock will result in GLPI being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the ownership interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise failing to qualify to be taxed as a REIT or would cause any income of GLPI that would otherwise qualify as rents from real property to fail to qualify as such; and

•such shareholder does not and represents that it will not own, actually or constructively, an interest in a tenant of GLPI (or a tenant of any entity owned or controlled by GLPI) that would cause GLPI to own, actually or constructively, more than a 9.9% interest (as set forth in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code) in such tenant (or GLPI’s board of directors determines that rent derived from such tenant will not affect GLPI’s ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT).

Peter M. Carlino, GLPI’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Carlino Family Trust, The Vanguard Group Inc., BlackRock, Inc., Cohen & Steers, Inc., Capital World Investors and Capital International Investors have each been deemed excepted holders by GLPI’s board of directors.

As a condition of granting the waiver or establishing the excepted holder limit, GLPI’s board of directors may require an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the IRS, in either case in form and in substance satisfactory to GLPI’s board of directors (in its sole discretion) in order to determine or ensure GLPI’s status as a REIT and such representations and undertakings from the person requesting the exception as GLPI’s board of directors may require (in its sole discretion) to make the determinations above. GLPI’s board of directors may impose such conditions or restrictions as it deems appropriate in connection with granting such a waiver or establishing an excepted holder limit.

GLPI’s board of directors may from time to time increase or decrease the common stock ownership limit, the aggregate stock ownership limit or both, for all other persons, unless, after giving effect to such increase, five or fewer individuals could beneficially own, in the aggregate, more than 49.9% in value of GLPI’s outstanding stock. A reduced ownership limit will not apply to any person or entity whose percentage ownership of GLPI common stock or GLPI stock of all classes and series, as applicable, is, at the effective time of such reduction, in excess of such decreased ownership limit until such time as such person’s or entity’s percentage ownership of GLPI common stock or GLPI stock of all classes and series, as applicable, equals or falls below the decreased ownership limit, but any further acquisition of shares of GLPI common stock or stock of all other classes or series, as applicable, will violate the decreased ownership limit.

The Articles of Incorporation further prohibit:

•any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of GLPI stock that would result in GLPI being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the ownership interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise cause GLPI to fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT;

•any person from transferring shares of GLPI stock if the transfer would result in shares of GLPI stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons (determined without reference to the rules of attribution under Section 544 of the Code); and

•any person from constructively owning shares of GLPI stock to the extent that such constructive ownership would cause any of GLPI’s income that would otherwise qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of Section 856(d) of the Code to fail to qualify as such.

Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of GLPI stock that will or may violate the ownership limits or any of the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above, or who would have owned shares of GLPI stock transferred to the charitable trust described below, must immediately give notice to GLPI of such event or, in the case of an attempted or proposed transaction, give GLPI at least fifteen days’ prior written notice and provide GLPI with such other information as it may request in order to determine the effect of such transfer on its status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock will not apply if GLPI’s board of directors determines that it is no longer in GLPI’s best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, to be taxed as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions and limits on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above is no longer required in order for GLPI to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

If any transfer of shares of GLPI stock or any other event would result in any person violating the ownership limits or any other restriction on ownership and transfer of GLPI shares described above then that number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) that would cause the violation will be automatically transferred to, and held by, a trust for the benefit of one or more charitable organizations selected by GLPI, and the intended transferee or other prohibited owner will acquire no rights in the shares. The automatic transfer will be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the violative transfer or other event that results in a transfer to the trust. If the transfer to the trust as described above would not be effective, for any reason, to prevent violation of the applicable ownership limits or any other restriction on ownership and transfer of GLPI shares described above, then the Articles of Incorporation provide that the transfer of the shares will be null and void and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares.

Shares of GLPI stock held in the trust will continue to be issued and outstanding shares. The prohibited owner will not benefit economically from ownership of any shares of GLPI stock held in the trust and will have no rights to distributions and no rights to vote or other rights attributable to the shares of GLPI stock held in the trust. The trustee of the trust shall have all voting rights and rights to dividends and other distributions with respect to shares held in the trust for the exclusive benefit of the charitable beneficiary of the trust. Any distribution made before GLPI’s discovery that the shares have been transferred to a trust as described above must be repaid by the recipient to the trustee upon demand and any dividend or other distribution authorized but unpaid shall be paid when due to the trustee. Subject to Pennsylvania law, effective as of the date that the shares have been transferred to the trust, the trustee will have the authority (at the trustee’s sole discretion) (i) to rescind as void any vote cast by a prohibited owner or unsuitable person, as applicable, before GLPI’s discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and (ii) to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary of the trust. However, if GLPI has already taken irreversible corporate action, then the trustee may not rescind and recast the vote.

Shares of GLPI stock transferred to the trustee will be deemed offered for sale to GLPI, or its designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (i) the market price of the shares on the day of the event causing the shares to be held in the trust, or (ii) the market price on the date GLPI, or its designee, accepts such offer. GLPI may reduce the amount so payable to the prohibited owner by the amount of any distribution that GLPI made to the prohibited owner before it discovered that the shares had been automatically transferred to the trust and that are then owed by the prohibited owner to the trustee as described above, and GLPI may pay the amount of any such reduction to the trustee for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. GLPI will have the right to accept such offer until the trustee has sold the shares of GLPI stock held in the trust as discussed below. Upon a sale to GLPI, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate, and the trustee must distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the prohibited owner and must distribute any distributions held by the trustee with respect to such shares to the charitable beneficiary.

If GLPI does not buy the shares, the trustee must, within 20 days of receiving notice from GLPI of the transfer of shares to the trust, sell the shares to a person or entity designated by the trustee who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits or the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock. After the sale of the shares, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee must distribute to the prohibited owner an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the market price of the shares on the day of the event causing the shares to be held in the trust and (ii) the sales proceeds (net of any commissions and other expenses of sale) received by the trust for the shares. The trustee may reduce the amount payable to the prohibited owner by the amount of any distribution that GLPI paid to the prohibited owner before GLPI

discovered that the shares had been automatically transferred to the trust and that are then owed by the prohibited owner to the trustee as described above. Any net sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the prohibited owner must be paid immediately to the charitable beneficiary, together with any distributions thereon. In addition, if prior to the discovery by GLPI that shares of stock have been transferred to a trust, such shares of stock are sold by a prohibited owner, then such shares will be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the trust and, to the extent that the prohibited owner received an amount for such shares that exceeds the amount that such prohibited owner was entitled to receive, such excess amount will be paid to the trustee upon demand. The prohibited owner will have no rights in the shares held by the trustee.

In addition, if GLPI’s board of directors determines in good faith that a transfer or other event has occurred that would violate the restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above or that a person or entity intends to acquire or has attempted to acquire beneficial or constructive ownership of any shares of GLPI stock in violation of the restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above, GLPI’s board of directors may take such action as it deems advisable to refuse to give effect to or to prevent such transfer or other event, including, but not limited to, causing GLPI to redeem shares of GLPI stock, refusing to give effect to the transfer of GLPI’s books or instituting proceedings to enjoin the transfer or other event.

Every person or entity who is a beneficial owner or constructive owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder) in number of value (whichever is more restrictive) of GLPI stock, within 30 days after initially reaching such ownership threshold and within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, must give GLPI written notice stating the shareholder’s name and address, the number of shares of each class and series of GLPI stock that the shareholder beneficially or constructively owns and a description of the manner in which the shares are held. Each such owner must provide to GLPI such additional information as GLPI may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of the shareholder’s beneficial ownership on GLPI’s qualification as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the applicable ownership limits. In addition, any person or entity that will be a beneficial owner or constructive owner of shares of GLPI stock and any person or entity (including the shareholder of record) who is holding shares of GLPI stock for a beneficial owner or constructive owner must provide to GLPI such information as GLPI may request in order to determine GLPI’s qualification as a REIT and to comply with the requirements of any governmental or taxing authority or to determine such compliance and to ensure compliance with the ownership limits.

Any certificates representing shares of GLPI stock will bear a legend referring to the restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above.

The restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock described above could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for GLPI common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of GLPI shareholders.

Redemption of Securities Owned or Controlled by an Unsuitable Person or Affiliate

In addition to the restrictions set forth above, all of GLPI’s outstanding capital stock shall be held subject to applicable gaming laws. Any person owning or controlling at least five percent of any class of GLPI’s outstanding capital stock will be required by the Articles of Incorporation to promptly notify GLPI of such person’s identity. The Articles of Incorporation provide that capital stock of GLPI that is owned or controlled by an unsuitable person or an affiliate of an unsuitable person is redeemable by GLPI, out of funds legally available for that redemption, to the extent required by the gaming authorities making the determination of unsuitability or to the extent determined to be necessary or advisable by GLPI’s board of directors. From and after the redemption date, the securities will not be considered outstanding and all rights of the unsuitable person or affiliate will cease, other than the right to receive the redemption price. The redemption price with respect to any securities to be redeemed will be the price, if any, required to be paid by the gaming authority making the finding of unsuitability or if the gaming authority does not require a price to be paid (including if the finding of unsuitability is made by GLPI’s board of directors alone), the lesser of (i) the market price on the date of the redemption notice, (ii) the market price on the redemption date or (iii) the actual amount paid by the owner thereof, in each case less a discount in a percentage (up to 100%) to be determined by GLPI’s board of directors in its sole and absolute discretion. The redemption price may be paid in cash, by promissory note, or both, as required by the applicable gaming authority and, if not, as determined by GLPI.

The Articles of Incorporation also provide that capital stock of GLPI that is owned or controlled by an unsuitable person or an affiliate of an unsuitable person will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and that any such unsuitable person or affiliate will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the price paid by the unsuitable person or affiliate for the shares or the amount realized from the sale, in each case less a discount in a percentage (up to 100%) to be determined by the GLPI board of directors in its sole and absolute discretion.

The Articles of Incorporation require any unsuitable person and any affiliate of an unsuitable person to indemnify and hold harmless GLPI and its affiliated companies for any and all losses, costs, and expenses, including attorneys’ costs, fees and expenses, incurred by GLPI and its affiliated companies as a result of, or arising out of, the unsuitable person’s ownership or control of any securities of GLPI, failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, or failure to divest himself, herself or itself of any securities when and in the specific manner required by a gaming authority or the Articles of Incorporation.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent and registrar for GLPI common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust.

DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES

General

We issue debt securities in one or more series under an indenture dated October 30, 2013 among GLP Capital, L.P. and GLP Financing II, Inc., two wholly-owned Subsidiaries of GLPI, as issuers, GLPI as parent guarantor and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The terms of the debt securities include those stated in the base indenture as supplemented by the supplemental indenture or officer’s certificate related to such debt securities (the base indenture, as supplemented, is referred to as the “indenture”) and those made part of the indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the “TIA”).

In this description, (1) the “Operating Partnership” refers only to GLP Capital, L.P., and not to any of its Subsidiaries, (2) “Capital Corp.” refers only to GLP Financing II, Inc., and not to any of its Subsidiaries, (3) “Issuers,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer only to the Operating Partnership and Capital Corp., and (4) “Guarantor” refers only to GLPI and not to any of its Subsidiaries. Other defined terms used in this description but not defined below under the caption “-Certain Definitions” have the meanings assigned to them in the indenture.

The following description is a summary of the material provisions of our existing senior unsecured notes (as defined below) and the indenture. It does not restate the indenture in its entirety. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the base indenture and supplemental indentures, which are included as exhibits to GLPI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, of which this exhibit is a part.

The registered holder of an existing senior unsecured note is treated as the owner of it for all purposes. Only registered holders have rights under the indenture.

5.375% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2026

On April 28, 2016, the Issuers issued $975 million of 5.375% senior unsecured notes maturing on April 15, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”), all of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2026 Notes accrues at the rate of 5.375% per annum and is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2026 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding April 1 and October 1. Interest on the 2026 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2028

On May 21, 2018, the Issuers issued $500 million of 5.75% senior unsecured notes maturing on June 1, 2028 (the “2028 Notes”), all of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2028 Notes accrues at the rate of 5.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2028 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding May 15 and November 15. Interest on the 2028 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was

due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

5.25% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2025

On May 1, 2018, the Issuers issued $500 million of 5.25% senior unsecured notes maturing on June 1, 2025 (the “Initial 2025 Notes”). On September 26, 2018, the Issuers issued an additional $350 million of 5.25% senior unsecured notes maturing on June 1, 2025 (the “New 2025 Notes,” and together with the Initial 2025 Notes, the “2025 Notes,”) which such notes became part of the same series as the Initial 2025 Notes. All of the 2025 Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2025 Notes accrues at the rate of 5.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2025 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding May 15 and November 15. Interest on the 2025 Notes will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

5.30% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2029

On September 26, 2018, the Issuers issued $750 million of 5.30% senior unsecured notes maturing on January 15, 2029 (the “2029 Notes”), all of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2029 Notes accrues at the rate of 5.30% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2029 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1. Interest on the 2029 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

3.350% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2024

On August 29, 2019, the Issuers issued $400 million of 3.350% senior unsecured notes maturing on September 1, 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), all of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2024 Notes accrues at the rate of 3.350% per annum and is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2024 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding February 15 and August 15. Interest on the 2024 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

4.000% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2030

On August 29, 2019, the Issuers issued $700 million of 4.000% senior unsecured notes maturing on January 15, 2030 (the “2030 Notes”, all of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2030 Notes accrues at the rate of 4.000% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2030 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1. Interest on the 2030 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

4.000% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2031

On June 25, 2020, the Issuers issued $500 million of 4.000% senior unsecured notes maturing on January 15, 2031 (the “Initial 2031 Notes”). On August 18, 2020, the Issuers issued an additional $200 million of 4.000% senior unsecured notes maturing on January 15, 2031 (the “New 2031 Notes,” and together with the Initial 2031 Notes, the “2031 Notes,”). All of the 2031 Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2031 Notes accrues at the rate of 4.000% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2031 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1. Interest on the 2031 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

3.250% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2032

On December 13, 2021, the Issuers issued $800 million of 3.250% senior unsecured notes maturing on January 15, 2032 (the “2032 Notes,”. All of the 2032 Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2031 Notes accrues at the rate of 3.250% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2032 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1. Interest on the 2032 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

6.750% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2033

On November 22, 2023, the Issuers issued $400 million of 6.750% senior unsecured notes maturing on December 1, 2033 (the “2033 Notes,” and together with the 2026 Notes, the 2028 Notes, the 2025 Notes, the 2029 Notes, the 2024 Notes, the 2030 Notes, the 2031 Notes and the 2032 Notes, the “existing senior unsecured notes” or the “notes”). All of the 2033 Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Interest on the 2033 Notes accrues at the rate of 6.750% per annum and is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on June 1, 2024. The Issuers will make each interest payment on the 2033 Notes to the holders of record on the immediately preceding May 15 and November 15. Interest on the 2033 Notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. If any interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date falls on a day that is not a business day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest may be made on the next succeeding business day as if made on the date such payment was due, and no interest will accrue on such payment for the period from and after such interest payment date, redemption date, repurchase date or maturity date, as the case may be, to the date of such payment on the next succeeding business day.

Brief Description of the Existing Senior Unsecured Notes and the Existing Senior Unsecured Notes Guarantee

Each of the series of existing senior unsecured notes:

•represents general senior unsecured obligations of the Issuers;

•is pari passu in right of payment with all of the Issuers’ senior indebtedness, including all of the other series of existing senior unsecured notes and borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Agreement, without giving effect to collateral arrangements;

•is effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of the Issuers' secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness;

•is senior in right of payment to all of the Issuers’ senior subordinated or subordinated indebtedness;

•is structurally subordinated to all liabilities of the Issuers’ Subsidiaries (other than Capital Corp., which is a co-Issuer of the notes); and

•is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Guarantor.

The existing senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by the Guarantor; however, the Guarantor is not subject to most of the covenants in the indenture.

The guarantee of each series of the existing senior unsecured notes:

•represents general unsecured obligation of the Guarantor;

•is pari passu in right of payment with all of the Guarantor’s senior indebtedness, including its guarantee of all of the other series of existing senior unsecured notes and borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Agreement, without giving effect to collateral arrangements;

•is effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of the Guarantor’s secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness;

•is senior in right of payment to all of the Guarantor’s senior subordinated or subordinated indebtedness; and

•is structurally subordinated to all liabilities of the Guarantor’s Subsidiaries (other than the Issuers).

The obligation of the Guarantor under its guarantee is limited as necessary to prevent that guarantee from constituting a fraudulent conveyance under applicable law.

As of December 31, 2023, the Issuers, the Guarantor and the Issuers’ Subsidiaries had no indebtedness outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Agreement. The indenture permits the Issuers and the Issuers’ Subsidiaries to incur substantial additional indebtedness and does not limit the amount of indebtedness that the Guarantor may incur.

Additional Notes

The Issuers may issue additional notes of a series the same as or different from any of the series of the existing senior unsecured notes from time to time under the indenture. Any issuance of additional notes is subject to the covenants set forth below under “-Certain Covenants-Limitations on Incurrence of Indebtedness.” Any additional notes of the same series as any of the series of the existing senior unsecured notes subsequently issued will be treated as a single series with the applicable series of the existing senior unsecured notes for all purposes under the indenture, including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. The Issuers issue notes in denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000.

Sinking Fund

The notes will not be entitled to the benefit of any sinking fund.

Redemption

Optional Redemption

We may redeem all or part of any series of the notes other than the 2033 Notes at any time at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of:

(1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, and

(2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon that would be due if such notes matured 90 days prior to their maturity date (or 30 days in the case of the 2024 Notes or three months in the case of the 2032 Notes) (the “Par Call Date”) but for the redemption thereof (exclusive of interest accrued to, but not including, the date of redemption) discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (or the Adjusted Treasury Rate in the case of the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) plus 50 basis points (or 40 basis points in the case of the 2030 Notes, 30 basis points in the case of the 2032 Notes and the 2024 Notes and 35 basis points in the case of the 2029 Notes), plus accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed to, but not including, the date of redemption; provided, however, that if we redeem the notes on or after the applicable Par Call Date, the redemption price will equal 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed to, but not including, the date of redemption; provided, further, that installments of interest that are due and payable on any interest payment dates falling on or prior to a redemption date shall be payable on

such interest payment dates to the persons who were registered holders of the notes to be redeemed at the close of business on the applicable record dates.

With respect to the 2033 Notes, (A) prior to September 1, 2033 (3 months prior to their maturity date) (the “2033 Notes Par Call Date”), we may redeem all or part of the 2033 Notes at any time and from time to time, at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount and rounded to three decimal places) equal to the greater of:

(1) (a) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date (assuming the 2033 Notes matured on the 2033 Notes Par Call Date) on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the 2033 Notes Treasury Rate plus 40 basis points less (b) interest accrued to the date of redemption, and

(2) 100% of the principal amount of the 2033 Notes to be redeemed,

plus, in either case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date; and

(B) on or after the 2033 Notes Par Call Date, we may redeem all or any part of the 2033 Notes at any time and from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2033 Notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

Our actions and determinations in determining the redemption price for redemption of the 2033 Notes shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.

Unless we default in our payment of the redemption price, on and after the redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the notes or portions of such notes called for redemption.

“Comparable Treasury Issue” means the United States Treasury security selected by the Quotation Agent as having a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the applicable series of notes being redeemed calculated as if the maturity date of such notes was the applicable Par Call Date (as applicable, the “Remaining Life”), that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable maturity to the Remaining Life of such series of notes.

“Comparable Treasury Price” means, with respect to any redemption date, (1) the average of four Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such redemption date, after excluding the highest and lowest of such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, or (2) if the Issuers are provided fewer than four such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such quotations.

“Quotation Agent” means the Reference Treasury Dealer appointed by the Issuers to act as the Quotation Agent from time to time.

“Reference Treasury Dealer” means (1) with respect to the 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its successors, BofA Securities, Inc. and its successors, Fifth Third Securities, Inc. and its successors and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and its successors; (2) with respect to the 2029 Notes, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and their respective successors; (3) with respect to the 2025 Notes and 2028 Notes, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its successors and (4) with respect to the 2026 Notes, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC or Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and their respective successors; provided, however, that if any of the foregoing shall cease to be a primary U.S. Government securities dealer in New York City (a “Primary Treasury Dealer”), we will substitute therefor another Primary Treasury Dealer, and (5) any other Primary Treasury Dealers selected by the Issuers.

“Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations” means, with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption date, the average, as determined by an Issuer, of the bid and asked prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to the Issuers by such Reference Treasury Dealer at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the third business day preceding such redemption date (or in the case of the notes that reference a Reference Treasury Dealer other than the 2026 Notes, the third business day preceding the relevant Deposit Date in connection with the satisfaction and discharge of notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture).

“Treasury Rate” means, with respect to any redemption date for the redemption of notes other than the 2033 Notes, the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, assuming a price for the

Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price on such redemption date.

Gaming Redemption

In addition to the foregoing, if any Gaming Authority requires that a holder or Beneficial Owner of notes must be licensed, qualified or found suitable under any applicable Gaming Laws and such holder or Beneficial Owner:

(1) fails to apply for a license, qualification or a finding of suitability within 30 days (or such shorter period as may be required by the applicable Gaming Authority) after being requested to do so by the Gaming Authority, or

(2) is denied such license or qualification or not found suitable, or if any Gaming Authority otherwise requires that notes from any holder or Beneficial Owner be redeemed, subject to applicable Gaming Laws the Issuers shall have the right, at their option:

(i) to require any such holder or Beneficial Owner to dispose of its notes within 30 days (or such earlier date as may be required by the applicable Gaming Authority) of receipt of such notice or finding by such Gaming Authority, or

(ii) to call for the redemption of the notes of such holder or Beneficial Owner at a redemption price equal to the least of:

(A) the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the earlier of the date of redemption or the date of the denial of license or qualification or of the finding of unsuitability by such Gaming Authority,

(B) the price at which such holder or Beneficial Owner acquired the notes, together with accrued interest to the earlier of the date of redemption or the date of the denial of license or qualification or of the finding of unsuitability by such Gaming Authority, or

The Issuers shall notify the trustee in writing of any such redemption as soon as practicable. The holder or Beneficial Owner applying for license, qualification or a finding of suitability must pay all costs of the licensure or investigation for such qualification or finding of suitability.

No Mandatory Redemption

The Issuers are not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the notes.

Selection and Notice

If less than all of the notes of any series other than the 2033 Notes are to be redeemed at any time, the trustee will select notes of such series for redemption as follows:

(1) if the notes are listed on any national securities exchange, in compliance with the requirements of the principal national securities exchange on which the notes are listed; or

(2) if the notes are not listed on any national securities exchange, on a pro rata basis, by lot or by such method as the trustee deems fair and appropriate and in accordance with DTC procedures.

No notes of $2,000 or less can be redeemed in part. Notices of redemption of notes other than the 2033 Notes will be mailed by first class mail (or in the case of global notes, given pursuant to applicable DTC procedures) at least 30 (or 15 in the case of the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each holder of notes to be redeemed at its registered address and notices of redemption of the 2033 Notes will be mailed or electronically delivered (or otherwise transmitted in accordance with the depositary’s procedures) at least 10 days but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each holder of notes to be redeemed, except that (a) with respect to notes other than the 2033 Notes, redemption notices may be mailed or given more than 60 days prior to a redemption date if the notice is issued in connection with a defeasance of the notes or a satisfaction and discharge of the indenture, and (b) redemption notices may be mailed or given less than 30 days (or 10 days in the case of the 2033 Notes and 15 days in the case of the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) or more than 60 days prior to a redemption date if so required by any applicable Gaming Authority in connection with a redemption described above under the caption “—Redemption-Gaming Redemption.”

In the case of a partial redemption of the 2033 Notes, selection of the 2033 Notes for redemption will be made pro rata, by lot or by such other method as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems appropriate and fair. If any note (not limited to the 2033

Notes) is to be redeemed in part only, the notice of redemption that relates to that note will state the portion of the principal amount of that note that is to be redeemed. A new note in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion of the original note will be issued in the name of the holder of notes upon cancellation (or surrender for cancellation in the case of the 2033 Notes) of the original note. Notes other than the 2033 Notes called for redemption become due on the date fixed for redemption (subject to satisfaction of any applicable conditions precedent). For so long as the 2033 Notes are held by DTC (or other depository), the redemption of the 2033 Notes shall be done in accordance with the policies and procedures of the depositary. Unless we default in the payment of the redemption price, on and after the redemption date, interest ceases to accrue on notes or portions of them called for redemption. For the avoidance of doubt, the trustee shall not have any responsibility for calculating the redemption price.

Subject to applicable securities laws, the Issuers or their affiliates may at any time and from time to time purchase notes or other indebtedness. Any such purchases may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as well as with such consideration as the Issuers or any such affiliates may determine.

Repurchase at the Option of Holders

Change of Control and Rating Decline

If a Change of Control Triggering Event occurs with respect to a series of notes other than the 2033 Notes, 2032 Notes or the 2031 Notes, each holder of such notes will have the right to require the Issuers to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000) of that holder’s notes of the applicable series pursuant to an offer by the Issuers (a “Change of Control Offer”) on the terms set forth in the indenture, except to the extent the Issuers have previously redeemed such notes as described under “—Redemption-Optional Redemption.” In the Change of Control Offer, the Issuers will offer a payment in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest on the notes repurchased, to the date of purchase (the “Change of Control Payment”). Within 30 days following the occurrence of a Change of Control Triggering Event, the Issuers will mail a notice to each holder describing the transaction or transactions that constitute, or are expected to constitute, the Change of Control Triggering Event, and offering to repurchase notes on the date (the “Change of Control Payment Date”) specified in the notice, which date will be no earlier than 30 days and no later than 60 days after the date such notice is mailed (or in the case of global notes, given pursuant to applicable DTC procedures), pursuant to the procedures required by the indenture and described in such notice. The Issuers will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the notes as a result of a Change of Control Triggering Event. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of Control provisions of the indenture, the Issuers will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of Control provisions of the indenture by virtue of such conflict.

On the Change of Control Payment Date, the Issuers will, to the extent lawful:

(1) accept for payment all notes or portions of notes properly tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;

(2) deposit with the paying agent an amount equal to the Change of Control Payment in respect of all notes or portions of notes properly tendered; and

(3) deliver or cause to be delivered to the trustee the notes properly accepted together with an officer’s certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of notes or portions of notes being purchased by the Issuers.

The paying agent will promptly mail to each holder of notes properly tendered the Change of Control Payment for such notes, and the trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book entry) to each holder a new note equal in principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the notes surrendered, if any; provided that each new note will be in a principal amount of $2,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000.

The provisions described above that require the Issuers to make a Change of Control Offer following the occurrence of a Change of Control Triggering Event will be applicable whether or not any other provisions of the indenture are applicable. Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control Triggering Event, the indenture does not contain provisions that permit the holders of the notes to require that the Issuers repurchase or redeem the notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction.

The Issuers will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon the occurrence of a Change of Control Triggering Event if a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in

compliance with the requirements set forth in the indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Issuers and purchases all notes properly tendered and not withdrawn under the Change of Control Offer. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, a Change of Control Offer may be made in advance of an anticipated Change of Control Triggering Event, conditional upon such Change of Control Triggering Event.

If holders of not less than 90% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding applicable series of notes validly tender and do not withdraw such notes in a Change of Control Offer and the Issuers, or any third party making a Change of Control Offer in lieu of the Issuers as described above, purchase all of the notes validly tendered and not withdrawn by such holders, the Issuers or such third party will have the right, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice, given not more than 30 days following such purchase pursuant to the Change of Control Offer described above, to redeem all notes of the applicable series that remain outstanding following such purchase at a price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including the date of redemption.

The definition of “Change of Control” includes a phrase relating to the direct or indirect sale, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of “all or substantially all” of the properties or assets of the Guarantor, the Issuers and their Subsidiaries taken as a whole. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase “substantially all,” there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of notes to require the Issuers to repurchase its notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the assets of the Guarantor, the Issuers and their Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person or group may be uncertain.

The Revolving Credit Agreement provides that certain change of control events with respect to the Issuers would constitute a default under the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any future credit agreements or other agreements to which any of the Issuers becomes a party may contain similar provisions. In the event a Change of Control Triggering Event occurs at a time when the Issuers are prohibited from purchasing notes, the Issuers could seek the consent of their senior lenders to the purchase of notes or could attempt to refinance the borrowings that contain such prohibition. If the Issuers do not obtain such a consent or repay such borrowings, the Issuers will remain prohibited from purchasing notes. In such case, the Issuers’ failure to purchase tendered notes would constitute a default under the indenture which could, in turn, constitute a default under such other indebtedness.

Certain Covenants

Limitations on Incurrence of Indebtedness

Limitation on Total Debt. The Issuers shall not, and shall not permit any of their Subsidiaries to, incur any Indebtedness (other than Permitted Debt) if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Indebtedness, the Total Debt of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries on a pro forma basis (including pro forma application of the net proceeds from such Indebtedness) would exceed 60% of the sum of (i) Total Asset Value as of the end of the Latest Completed Quarter and (ii) any increase in Total Asset Value since the end of the Latest Completed Quarter (such sum of (i) and (ii), “Adjusted Total Asset Value”); provided, however, that from and after the consummation of a Significant Acquisition, such percentage shall be 65% for the fiscal quarter in which such Significant Acquisition is consummated and the three consecutive fiscal quarters immediately succeeding such fiscal quarter.

Limitation on Secured Debt. The Issuers shall not, and shall not permit any of their Subsidiaries to, incur any Secured Debt if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Secured Debt, the Secured Debt of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries on a pro forma basis (including pro forma application of the net proceeds from such Indebtedness) would exceed 40% of Adjusted Total Asset Value.

Interest Coverage Ratio. The Issuers shall not, and shall not permit any of their Subsidiaries to, incur any Indebtedness (other than Permitted Debt) if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Indebtedness, the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to Interest Expense for the Issuers and their Subsidiaries (the “Coverage Ratio”) for the four consecutive fiscal quarter period ending on and including the Latest Completed Quarter would be less than 1.50 to 1.00 on a pro forma basis (including pro forma application of the net proceeds from such Indebtedness).

Limitation on Subordinated Debt and Subsidiary Guarantees. The Issuers shall not incur, create, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any Indebtedness that is subordinate or junior in right of payment to any other Indebtedness of the Issuers, unless such Indebtedness is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the notes. The foregoing does not apply to distinctions between categories of Indebtedness that exist by reason of any Liens securing some but not all of such Indebtedness or securing such Indebtedness with greater or lesser priority or with different collateral or as a result of provisions that apply

proceeds or amounts received by the borrower, obligor or Issuer following a default or exercise of remedies in a certain order of priority.

In addition, following the date of the indenture, no Subsidiary of the Operating Partnership (excluding Capital Corp.) will directly or indirectly guarantee, or become jointly and severally liable with respect to any Debt Securities of the Operating Partnership (excluding, in any event, (x) Acquired Debt and (y) guarantees of such Acquired Debt or any other Indebtedness of the Operating Partnership to the extent a guarantee is required as a result of the assumption by the Operating Partnership of such Acquired Debt described in clause (x) pursuant to the terms thereof as they existed at the time of and after giving effect to (and are not modified in contemplation of, other than to give effect to) the assumption of or acquisition of such Acquired Debt) issued after the date of the indenture, unless a guarantee is provided in respect of the notes by such Subsidiary.

Maintenance of Total Unencumbered Assets

The Issuers and their Subsidiaries shall maintain Total Unencumbered Asset Value of not less than 150% of Unsecured Debt, in each case calculated as of the end of the Latest Completed Quarter.

Reports

Whether or not required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), so long as any notes are outstanding, the Issuers will furnish to the trustee with written instructions for mailing (or in the case of global notes, delivery pursuant to applicable DTC procedures) to the holders of notes, within 30 days after the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations:

(1) all quarterly and annual financial information that is filed or that would be required to be contained in a filing with the SEC on Forms 10-Q and 10-K if or as if the Issuers were required to file such forms, including a “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and, with respect to the annual information only, a report on the annual financial statements by the Issuers’ certified independent accountants; and

(2) all current reports that would be required to be filed with the SEC on Form 8-K if the Issuers were required to file such reports.

The availability of the foregoing materials on the SEC’s EDGAR service (or any successor thereto) shall be deemed to satisfy the Issuers’ obligations to furnish such materials to the trustee with written instructions for mailing (or in the case of global notes, delivery pursuant to applicable DTC procedures) to the holders of notes; provided, however, that the trustee shall have no obligation whatsoever to determine whether or not such information, documents or reports have been filed pursuant to the “EDGAR” system (or its successor).

Delivery of such reports, information and documents to the trustee is for informational purposes only and the trustee’s receipt of such shall not constitute constructive notice of any information contained therein or determinable from information contained therein, including the Issuers’ compliance with any of its covenants under the indenture (as to which the trustee is entitled to rely exclusively on officer’s certificates).

In addition, the Issuers have agreed that, for so long as any 2026 Notes remain outstanding, if the Issuers are not required to file with the SEC the reports required by the first paragraph of this covenant, it will furnish to the holders of the 2026 Notes and to securities analysts and prospective investors, upon their request, the information required to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, for so long as the Guarantor guarantees the notes (or in the event that another parent entity of the Issuers becomes a guarantor of the notes), the Issuers may satisfy their obligations to furnish the reports and other information described above by furnishing such reports filed by, or such information of, the Guarantor (or such other parent guarantor, respectively) and the availability of the Guarantor’s (or such other parent guarantor’s, as applicable) information on the SEC’s EDGAR service (or any successor thereto) shall be deemed to satisfy such obligation.

Penn Master Lease

The Issuers will not enter into any amendment to the Penn Master Lease if such amendment would materially impair the ability of the Issuers to satisfy their obligations to make payments on the notes other than the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes; provided that amendments of the Penn Master Lease (and corresponding rent reduction) pursuant to the terms of the Penn Master Lease in connection with an asset sale made in accordance with the Penn Master Lease shall not be deemed to

materially impair the ability of the Issuers to satisfy their obligations to make payments on the notes or to materially impair the rights and remedies of the holders of the notes.

Consolidation, Merger and Sale of Assets

Each Issuer may not, directly or indirectly: (x) consolidate or merge with or into another Person (whether or not such Issuer is the surviving entity); or (y) sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of such Issuer and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person unless:

(1) either (a) such Issuer is the surviving Person; or (b) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than such Issuer) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been made is a Person organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia (provided that if such Person is not a corporation, a co-obligor of the notes is a corporation organized or existing under such laws);

(2) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than an Issuer) or the Person to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been made assumes all the obligations of such Issuer under the notes and the indenture pursuant to agreements reasonably satisfactory to the trustee; and

(3) immediately after such transaction no default or event of default exists with respect to the notes.

The Guarantor may not, directly or indirectly: (x) consolidate or merge with or into another Person (whether or not the Guarantor is the surviving corporation); or (y) sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Guarantor and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person unless:

(1) either (a) the Guarantor is the surviving corporation; or (b) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the Guarantor) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been made is a Person organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia;

(2) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the Guarantor) or the Person to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been made assumes all the obligations of the Guarantor under the notes and the indenture pursuant to agreements reasonably satisfactory to the trustee; and

(3) immediately after such transaction no default or event of default exists with respect to the notes.

Upon any sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of an Issuer’s or the Guarantor’s, as applicable, and its Subsidiaries’ assets, taken as a whole, in compliance with the provisions of this “Consolidation, Merger and Sale of Assets” covenant, such Issuer or the Guarantor, as applicable, will be released from the obligations under the notes or its guarantee, respectively, and the indenture except with respect to any obligations that arise from, or are related to, such transaction.

This “Consolidation, Merger and Sale of Assets” covenant will not apply to:

(1) a merger, consolidation, sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of assets between or among the Guarantor, the Issuers (or an Issuer) or any of the Issuers’ Subsidiaries;

(2) a merger between the Issuers (or an Issuer), the Guarantor or any Subsidiary respectively, and an Affiliate of an Issuer, the Guarantor or such Subsidiary incorporated or formed solely for the purpose of reincorporating or reorganizing an Issuer, the Guarantor or such Subsidiary in another state of the United States or changing the legal domicile or form of an Issuer, the Guarantor or such Subsidiary or for the sole purpose of forming or collapsing a holding company structure;

(3) the lease of all or substantially all of the real estate assets of the Guarantor or any Issuer, or any of their respective Subsidiaries, to Penn or its Subsidiaries or another operator pursuant to the Penn Master Lease, Pinnacle Master Lease or another real estate lease or leases; or

(4) except with respect to the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, the Penn Transactions and any transactions related thereto.

The description above includes a phrase relating to the sale or disposition of “all or substantially all” of the properties or assets of the Issuers or the Guarantor, and their respective Subsidiaries. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase “substantially all,” there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law.

Certain Definitions

“2013 Offering Memorandum” means the offering memorandum of the Issuers, dated October 23, 2013.

“2033 Notes Treasury Rate” means, with respect to any redemption date for redemption of the 2033 Notes, the yield determined by the Issuers in accordance with the following two paragraphs.

The 2033 Notes Treasury Rate shall be determined by the Issuers after 4:15 p.m., New York City time (or after such time as yields on U.S. government securities are posted daily by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), on the third business day preceding the date of the notice of redemption based upon the yield or yields for the most recent day that appear after such time on such day in the most recent statistical release published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System designated as “Selected Interest Rates (Daily) - H.15” (or any successor designation or publication) (“H.15”) under the caption “U.S. government securities—Treasury constant maturities—Nominal” (or any successor caption or heading) (“H.15 TCM”). In determining the 2033 Notes Treasury Rate, the Issuers shall select, as applicable: (1) the yield for the Treasury constant maturity on H.15 exactly equal to the period from the redemption date to the 2033 Notes Par Call Date (the “2033 Notes Remaining Life”); or (2) if there is no such Treasury constant maturity on H.15 exactly equal to the 2033 Notes Remaining Life, the two yields—one yield corresponding to the Treasury constant maturity on H.15 immediately shorter than and one yield corresponding to the Treasury constant maturity on H.15 immediately longer than the 2033 Notes Remaining Life—and shall interpolate to the 2033 Notes Par Call Date on a straight-line basis (using the actual number of days) using such yields and rounding the result to three decimal places; or (3) if there is no such Treasury constant maturity on H.15 shorter than or longer than the 2033 Notes Remaining Life, the yield for the single Treasury constant maturity on H.15 closest to the 2033 Notes Remaining Life. For purposes of this paragraph, the applicable Treasury constant maturity or maturities on H.15 shall be deemed to have a maturity date equal to the relevant number of months or years, as applicable, of such Treasury constant maturity from the redemption date.

If on the third business day preceding the date of the notice of redemption H.15 TCM is no longer published, the Issuers shall calculate the 2033 Notes Treasury Rate based on the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity at 11:00 a.m., New York City time, on the second business day preceding the date of the notice of redemption of the United States Treasury security maturing on, or with a maturity that is closest to, the 2033 Notes Par Call Date, as applicable. If there is no United States Treasury security maturing on the 2033 Notes Par Call Date but there are two or more United States Treasury securities with a maturity date equally distant from the 2033 Notes Par Call Date, one with a maturity date preceding the 2033 Notes Par Call Date and one with a maturity date following the 2033 Notes Par Call Date, the Issuers shall select the United States Treasury security with a maturity date preceding the 2033 Notes Par Call Date. If there are two or more United States Treasury securities maturing on the 2033 Notes Par Call Date or two or more United States Treasury securities meeting the criteria of the preceding sentence, the Issuers shall select from among these two or more United States Treasury securities the United States Treasury security that is trading closest to par based upon the average of the bid and asked prices for such United States Treasury securities at 11:00 a.m., New York City time. In determining the 2033 Notes Treasury Rate in accordance with the terms of this paragraph, the semi-annual yield to maturity of the applicable United States Treasury security shall be based upon the average of the bid and asked prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) at 11:00 a.m., New York City time, of such United States Treasury security, and rounded to three decimal places.

“Acquired Debt” means, with respect to any specified Person:

(1) Indebtedness of any other Person existing at the time such other Person is merged with or into or becomes a Subsidiary of such specified Person, whether or not such Indebtedness is incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such other Person merging with or into, or becoming a Subsidiary of, such specified Person; and

(2) Indebtedness secured by a Lien encumbering any asset acquired by such specified Person.

“Adjusted Treasury Rate” means, with respect to any redemption date for the redemption of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes or the 2031 Notes, the rate per year equal to the arithmetic mean of the weekly average yield to maturity (representing the average of the daily rates for the immediately preceding week) available through the most recent Statistical Release under the heading “Week Ending” for “U.S. Government Securities—Treasury Constant Maturities” for the maturity (rounded to the nearest month) corresponding to the remaining term of the notes being redeemed as of such redemption date, calculated as if the maturity date of such notes was the Par Call Date (as applicable, the “Remaining Life”). If no maturity exactly corresponds to such Remaining Life, yields for the next shortest and next longest published maturities most closely corresponding to such Remaining Life shall be calculated pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence and the Adjusted Treasury Rate shall be interpolated or extrapolated from such yields on a straight-line basis, rounding in each of such relevant periods to the nearest month. For the purposes of calculating the Adjusted Treasury Rate, the most recent Statistical Release published at least two business days prior to the redemption date (or at least two business days prior to the relevant Deposit Date in connection with a satisfaction and discharge of the such notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture) shall be used.

“Asset Value” means, at any date of determination, the sum of:

(1) in the case of any Income Property (or group of Income Properties, including, without limitation, the Penn Master Lease Properties), the Capitalized Value of such Income Property (or group of Income Properties) as of such date; provided, however, that the Asset Value of each Income Property (other than a former Development Property or Redevelopment Property) during the first four complete fiscal quarters following the date of acquisition thereof shall be the greater of (i) the acquisition price thereof and (ii) the Capitalized Value thereof (provided that the Asset Value shall be the acquisition price thereof if results of one full fiscal quarter after the acquisition thereof are not available with respect to such Income Property (or group of Income Properties) (and after results of one full fiscal quarter after the acquisition thereof are available, the Capitalized Value thereof may be determined by annualizing such results) including for purposes of determining any increase in Total Asset Value since the end of the Latest Completed Quarter); provided, further, that an adjustment shall be made to the Asset Value of any Income Property (in an amount reasonably determined by an Issuer) as new tenancy leases are entered into, or existing tenancy leases terminate or expire, in respect of such Income Property;

(2) in the case of any Development Property or Redevelopment Property (or former Development Property or Redevelopment Property) prior to the date when financial results are available for at least one complete fiscal quarter following completion or opening of the applicable development project, 100% of the book value (determined in accordance with GAAP but determined without giving effect to any depreciation) of any such Development Property or Redevelopment Property (or former Development Property or Redevelopment Property); and

(3) 100% of the book value (determined in accordance with GAAP) of any undeveloped land owned or leased as of such date of determination.

“Beneficial Owner” has the meaning assigned to such term in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act. The terms “Beneficially Owns” and “Beneficially Owned” have a corresponding meaning.

“Capitalized Value” means, with respect to the Penn Master Lease Properties or any other group of related properties or any other property, the Property EBITDA of the Penn Master Lease Properties or such other group of related properties or such property, as the case may be, for the most recent four completed fiscal quarters divided by 8.25%

“Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following:

(1) the direct or indirect sale, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Guarantor, the Operating Partnership and their Subsidiaries taken as a whole to any “person” (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act); provided, however, that for the avoidance of doubt, the lease of all or substantially all of the real estate assets of the Guarantor or any Issuer or any of their respective subsidiaries, to Penn or its Subsidiaries or to another operator pursuant to the Penn Master Lease or another real estate lease or leases shall not constitute a Change of Control;

(2) the adoption by shareholders or partners of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the Guarantor or the Operating Partnership;

(3) the consummation of any transaction (including any merger or consolidation) the result of which is that any “person” (as defined above), other than any holding company which owns 100% of the Voting Stock of the Guarantor (so long as no Change of Control would otherwise have occurred in respect of the Voting Stock of such holding company), becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Guarantor, measured by voting power rather than number of shares;

(4) (i) the Guarantor ceases to own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Operating Partnership or (ii) the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership ceases to be the Guarantor or one or more of the Guarantor’s wholly owned subsidiaries; or

(5) the first day on which a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Guarantor are not Continuing Directors.

For purposes of this definition, (1) no Change of Control shall be deemed to have occurred solely as a result of a transfer of assets among the Guarantor, any Issuer and any of their respective Subsidiaries and (2) a Person shall not be deemed to have beneficial ownership of securities subject to a stock purchase agreement, merger agreement or similar agreement until the consummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreement.

“Change of Control Triggering Event” means the occurrence of both (i) a Change of Control and (ii) a Rating Decline.

“Consolidated EBITDA” means, for the applicable test period, the net income (or net loss) of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries for such period, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, except to the extent that GAAP is not applicable, including, without limitation, with respect to the determination of all extraordinary, non-cash and non-

recurring items ((x) excluding, without duplication, gains (or losses) from dispositions of depreciable real estate investments, property valuation losses and impairment charges and (y) before giving effect to cash dividends on preferred units of the Issuers or charges resulting from the redemption of preferred units of the Issuers attributable to the Issuers and their Subsidiaries for such period determined on a consolidated basis in conformity with GAAP);

(1) plus, without duplication and solely to the extent already deducted (and not added back) in arriving at such net income (or net loss), the sum of the following amounts for such period:

(a) interest expense (whether paid or accrued and whether or not capitalized);

(b) income tax expense;

(d) amortization expense;

(e) extraordinary, non-recurring and unusual items, charges or expenses (including, without limitation, impairment charges, fees, costs and expenses relating to the Penn Transactions, prepayment penalties and costs, fees or expenses incurred in connection with any capital markets offering, debt financing, or amendment thereto, redemption or exchange of indebtedness, lease termination, business combination, acquisition, disposition, recapitalization or similar transaction (regardless of whether such transaction is completed));

(f) expenses and losses associated with hedging agreements;

(g) expenses and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;

(h) other non-cash items, charges or expenses reducing net income (or increasing net loss) (other than items that will require cash payments and for which an accrual or reserve is, or is required by GAAP to be, made in which case, at the election of the Issuers such items may be added back when accrued and deducted from net income when paid in cash, or given effect (and not added back to net income) when accrued or reserved);

(i) the amount of integration costs deducted (and not added back) in such period in computing the net income (or net loss);

(j) severance, relocation costs, signing costs, retention or completion bonuses, transition costs, curtailments or modifications to pension and post-retirement employee benefit plans (including any settlement of pension liabilities);

(k) in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, equity-based compensation; and

(l) to the extent not included in net income or, if otherwise excluded from Consolidated EBITDA due to the operation of clause (2)(a) below, the amount of insurance proceeds received during such period, or after such period and on or prior to the date the calculation is made with respect to such period, attributable to any property which has been closed or had operations curtailed for such period; provided that such amount of insurance proceeds shall only be included pursuant to this clause (l) to the extent of the amount of insurance proceeds plus Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such property for such period (without giving effect to this clause (k)) does not exceed Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such property during the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarter period that such property was fully operational (or if such property has not been fully operational for the most recent such period prior to such closure or curtailment, the Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such property during the consecutive fiscal quarter period prior to such closure or curtailment (for which financial results are available) annualized over four fiscal quarters);

(2) minus, without duplication and solely to the extent included in arriving at such net income (or net loss), the sum of the following amounts for such period:

(a) extraordinary, non-recurring and unusual gains (other than insurance proceeds);

(b) gains attributable to hedging agreements;

(d) other non-cash gains increasing net income (or decreasing net loss) other than accruals in the ordinary course.

For purposes of this definition, net income (net loss) shall only include the Issuers’ Ownership Share of net income (net loss) of their non-wholly owned Subsidiaries and Unconsolidated Affiliates and, accordingly, there shall be no deduction from net income or Consolidated EBITDA for non-controlling or minority interests in such Persons.

Consolidated EBITDA will be adjusted, without duplication, to give pro forma effect: (x) in the case of any assets having been placed-in-service or removed from service since the beginning of the period and on or prior to the date of determination, to include or exclude, as the case may be, any Consolidated EBITDA earned or eliminated as a result of the placement of such assets in service or removal of such assets from service as if the placement of such assets in service or removal of such assets from service occurred at the beginning of the period; and (y) in the case of any acquisition or disposition of any asset or group of assets since the beginning of the period and on or prior to the date of determination, including, without limitation, by merger, or stock or asset purchase or sale, to include or exclude, as the case may be, any Consolidated EBITDA earned or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or disposition of those assets as if the acquisition or disposition occurred at the beginning of the period. For purposes of calculating Consolidated EBITDA, all amounts shall be as reasonably determined by an Issuer, and in accordance with GAAP except to the extent that GAAP is not applicable, including, without limitation, with respect to the determination of extraordinary, non-cash or non-recurring items.

“Consolidated Financial Statements” means, with respect to any Person, collectively, the consolidated financial statements and notes to those financial statements, of that Person and its Subsidiaries prepared in accordance with GAAP.

“Continuing Directors” means, as of any date of determination, any member of the Board of Directors of the Guarantor who:

(1) was a member of such Board of Directors on the date of the indenture; or

(2) was nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval of a majority of the continuing directors under clause (1) or this clause (2) who were members of such Board at the time of such nomination or election.

“Credit Facilities” means one or more debt facilities or commercial paper facilities (providing for revolving credit loans, term loans, other loans, receivables financing (including through the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders against such receivables) or letters of credit) or debt securities, including any related notes, guarantees, collateral documents, agreements relating to swap or other hedging obligations, and other instruments, agreements and documents executed in connection therewith, in each case as amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced, restructured or otherwise refinanced in whole or in part from time to time by one or more agreements, facilities (whether or not in the form of a debt facility or commercial paper facility) or instruments.

“Debt Securities” means any debt securities, as such term is commonly understood, issued in any public offering or private placement in an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million or more.

“Development Property” means real property (a) acquired for, or currently under, development into an Income Property that, in accordance with GAAP, would be classified as an asset on the consolidated balance sheet of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries and (b) of the type described in clause (a) of this definition to be (but not yet) acquired by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries upon completion of construction pursuant to a contract in which the seller of such real property is required to build, develop or renovate prior to, and as a condition precedent to, such acquisition.

“Fitch” means Fitch Ratings, Inc., doing business as Fitch Ratings, or any successor thereto.

“GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles set forth as of the relevant date in the opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and statements and pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or agencies with similar functions of comparable stature and authority within the U.S. accounting profession), including, without limitation, any Accounting Standards Codifications, which are applicable to the circumstances as of the date of determination; provided that with respect to the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, if, as of a particular date as of which compliance with the covenants contained in the indenture is being determined, there have been changes in generally accepted accounting principles from those that applied to the consolidated financial statements of either Issuer or the Guarantor for the year ended December 31, 2022, December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019, respectively, the Issuers may, in their sole discretion, determine compliance with the covenants contained in the indenture using generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied, as in effect as of the end of any fiscal quarter selected by the Issuers, in its sole discretion, that is on or after December 31, 2022, December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019, respectively and prior to the date as of which compliance with the covenants in the indenture is being determined (“Fixed GAAP”), and, solely for purposes of calculating the covenants as of such date, “GAAP” shall mean Fixed GAAP; provided further that, and in the case of GAAP or Fixed GAAP with respect to the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, (1) any lease that is accounted for by any Person as an operating lease as of the issue date for the applicable series of existing senior unsecured notes, (2) the Pinnacle Master Lease and (3) any similar lease to either lease referred to in clauses (1) and (2) and entered into after the issue date for the applicable series of existing senior unsecured notes by any Person may, in the sole discretion of the Operating Partnership, be accounted for as an operating lease for purposes of such notes and the indenture with respect to such notes (and shall not constitute a capitalized lease).

“Gaming Approval” means any and all approvals, licenses, authorizations, permits, consents, rulings, orders or directives (a) relating to any gaming business (including pari-mutuel betting) or enterprise, including to enable the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries or affiliates to engage in or manage the casino, gambling, horse racing or gaming business or otherwise continue to conduct or manage such business substantially as is presently conducted or managed or contemplated to be conducted or managed or (b) required by any Gaming Law.

“Gaming Authority” means any governmental agency, authority, board, bureau, commission, department, office or instrumentality with regulatory, licensing or permitting authority or jurisdiction over any gaming business or enterprise or any Gaming Facility, or with regulatory, licensing or permitting authority or jurisdiction over any gaming operation (or proposed gaming operation) owned, managed or operated by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries.

“Gaming Facility” means any gaming or pari-mutuel wagering establishment, including any casino or “racino,” and other property or assets ancillary thereto or used in connection therewith, including any casinos, hotels, resorts, racetracks, off-track wagering sites, theaters, parking facilities, recreational vehicle parks, timeshare operations, retail shops, restaurants, other buildings, restaurants, theatres, related or ancillary businesses, land, golf courses and other recreation and entertainment facilities, marinas, vessels, barges, ships and equipment.

“Gaming Laws” means all applicable provisions of all: (a) constitutions, treaties, statutes or laws governing Gaming Facilities (including card club casinos and pari-mutuel racetracks) and rules, regulations, codes and ordinances of, and all administrative or judicial orders or decrees or other laws pursuant to which, any Gaming Authority possesses regulatory, licensing or permit authority over gambling, gaming, racing or Gaming Facility activities conducted or managed by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries or affiliates within its jurisdiction; (b) Gaming Approvals; and (c) orders, decisions, determinations, judgments, awards and decrees of any Gaming Authority.

“Income Property” means any real or personal property or assets or vessels (including any personal property ancillary thereto or used in connection therewith or in support thereof) owned, operated or leased or otherwise controlled by the Issuers or their Subsidiaries and earning, or intended to earn, current income whether from rent, lease payments, operations or otherwise. “Income Property” shall not include any Development Property, Redevelopment Property or undeveloped land during the period such property or assets or vessels are Development Properties, Redevelopment Properties or undeveloped land as reasonably determined by an Issuer.

“Indebtedness” means, as of any date of determination, all indebtedness for borrowed money of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries that is included as a liability on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Issuers in accordance with GAAP, excluding: (i) any indebtedness to the extent Discharged or to the extent secured by cash, cash equivalents or marketable securities (it being understood that cash collateral shall be deemed to include cash deposited with a trustee or other agent with respect to third party indebtedness), (ii) Intercompany Debt, (iii) all liabilities associated with customary exceptions to non-recourse indebtedness, such as for fraud, misapplication of funds, environmental indemnities, voluntary bankruptcy, collusive involuntary bankruptcy and other similar exceptions and (iv) any redeemable equity interest in the Issuers; provided that Indebtedness of a Subsidiary of any of the Issuers that is not a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Issuers shall be reduced to reflect the Issuers’ proportionate interest therein.

“Intercompany Debt” means, as of any date, Indebtedness to which the only parties are the Guarantor, the Issuers and any of their respective Subsidiaries as of such date; provided, however, that with respect to any such Indebtedness of which any of the Issuers is the borrower, such Indebtedness is subordinate in right of payment to the notes.

“Interest Expense” means, for any period of time, the aggregate amount of interest payable in cash on Indebtedness of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries, net of interest income and payments received under swap and other hedging agreements or arrangements relating to interest rates, and excluding (i) any commitment, upfront, arrangement or structuring fees or premiums (including redemption and prepayment premiums) or original issue discount, (ii) interest reserves funded from the proceeds of any Indebtedness, (iii) any cash costs associated with breakage in respect of hedging agreements for interest rates, (iv) all cash interest expense consisting of liquidated damages for failure to timely comply with registration rights obligations and financing fees, and (v) amortization of deferred financing costs; provided that the components of Interest Expense relating to a Subsidiary of any of the Issuers that is not a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Issuers shall be reduced to reflect the Issuers’ proportionate interest therein.

“Latest Completed Quarter” means, as of any date, the most recently ended fiscal quarter of the Issuers for which Consolidated Financial Statements of the Issuers (or the Guarantor or another parent guarantor, as applicable) have been completed, it being understood that at any time when the Issuers (or the Guarantor or another parent guarantor, as applicable) are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and in accordance therewith file annual and quarterly reports with the SEC,

the term “Latest Completed Quarter” shall be deemed to refer to the fiscal quarter covered by the Issuers’ (or the Guarantor’s or another parent guarantor’s, as applicable) most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or, in the case of the last fiscal quarter of the year, the Issuers’ (or the Guarantor’s or another parent guarantor’s, as applicable) Annual Report on Form 10-K.

“Lien” means, with respect to any asset (without duplication), any lien, security interest or other type of preferential arrangement for security, including, without limitation, the lien or retained security title of a conditional vendor; provided that, for purposes hereof, “Lien” shall not include any Lien related to Indebtedness that has been Discharged or otherwise satisfied by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries in accordance with the provisions thereof, including through the deposit of cash, cash equivalents or marketable securities (it being understood that cash collateral shall be deemed to include cash deposited with a trustee with respect to third party indebtedness).

“Original Master Lease Properties” means the Penn Master Lease Properties as of the date of the Penn Master Lease.

“Ownership Share” means, with respect to any Subsidiary (other than a wholly owned Subsidiary of any of the Issuers) or any Unconsolidated Affiliate of the Issuers, the Issuers’ relative direct and indirect economic interest (calculated as a percentage) in such Subsidiary or Unconsolidated Affiliate determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of the declaration of trust, articles or certificate of incorporation, articles of organization, partnership agreement, joint venture agreement or other applicable organizational document of such Subsidiary or Unconsolidated Affiliate.

“Penn” means Penn Entertainment, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.

“Penn Master Lease” means that certain Master Lease, dated as of November 1, 2013, between the Operating Partnership (and any Subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership acting as landlord or co-landlord) and the Penn Tenant, as it may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.

“Penn Master Lease Guaranty” means the Guaranty of the Penn Master Lease by Penn in favor of the Operating Partnership or a Subsidiary thereof.

“Penn Master Lease Properties” means, as of any date of determination, the real properties that are leased to Penn Tenant pursuant to the Penn Master Lease.

“Penn Spin-Off” means the spin-off of the Guarantor from Penn to the shareholders of Penn in November 2013, which resulted in the Operating Partnership having title to substantially all of the real estate assets held by Penn prior to the spin-off, and including the entering into by the Penn Tenant and the Operating Partnership (or one or more Subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership acting as landlord or co-landlord) of the Penn Master Lease.

“Penn Tenant” means Penn Tenant, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company, in its capacity as tenant under the Penn Master Lease, and its successors in such capacity.

“Penn Transactions” means, collectively, (a) the Penn Spin-Off and the series of corporate restructurings and other transactions entered into in connection with the foregoing, the acquisition by the Guarantor of the GLPI Assets (as defined in the 2013 Offering Memorandum) and the entering into of the Penn Master Lease, (b) the issuance of the Issuers’ 5.375% Senior Notes due 2023 and the Issuers’ 4.375% Senior Notes due 2018, which have been redeemed in full as of the date hereof and the entering into of the Credit Agreement on October 28, 2013, (c) the payment of the earnings and profits purge described in the 2013 Offering Memorandum, (d) any other transactions defined as “Transactions” in the 2013 Offering Memorandum and (e) the payment of fees and expenses in connection with the foregoing.

“Permitted Debt” means:

(1) Indebtedness incurred under the Credit Facilities on or prior to the date of the indenture; and

(2) Indebtedness represented by the existing senior unsecured notes.

“Permitted Replacement Lease” means (a) any new lease entered into pursuant to Section 17.1(f) of the Penn Master Lease, (b) any new lease entered into with a Qualified Successor Tenant or (c) any assignment of the Penn Master Lease to a Qualified Successor Tenant, in each case, whether in respect of all or a portion of the gaming facilities subject to the Penn Master Lease.

“Person” means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or government or other entity.

“Pinnacle” means Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

“Pinnacle Master Lease” means that certain master lease, dated as of April 28, 2016, between, Pinnacle MLS, LLC, as tenant, and Gold Merger Sub, LLC (as successor to Pinnacle), as landlord, as such Master Lease may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.

“pro forma basis” means:

(1) For purposes of calculating the amount of Total Debt or Secured Debt or Unsecured Debt under “—Certain Covenants-Limitations on Incurrence of Indebtedness-Limitation on Total Debt” and “—Limitation on Secured Debt,” there shall be excluded Indebtedness to the extent secured by cash, cash equivalents or marketable securities (it being understood that cash collateral shall be deemed to include cash deposited with a trustee or other agent with respect to third party indebtedness) or which has been repaid, discharged, defeased (whether by covenant or legal defeasance), retired, repurchased or redeemed or otherwise satisfied on or prior to the date such calculation is being made or for which the Guarantor, the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries has irrevocably made a deposit to repay, defease (whether by covenant or legal defeasance), discharge, repurchase, retire or redeem or otherwise satisfy or called for redemption, defeasance (whether by covenant or legal defeasance), discharge, repurchase or retirement, on or prior to the date such calculation is being made (collectively, “Discharged”);

(2) For purposes of calculating the Coverage Ratio:

(a) in the event that the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries incurs, assumes, guarantees or Discharges any Indebtedness (other than ordinary working capital borrowings) subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the Coverage Ratio is being calculated and on or prior to the date such calculation is being made, then the Coverage Ratio will be calculated giving pro forma effect thereto, and the use of the proceeds therefrom (including any such transaction giving rise to the need to calculate the Coverage Ratio), in each case, as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period and Interest Expense relating to any such Indebtedness that has been Discharged or to the extent secured by cash, cash equivalents or marketable securities (it being understood that cash collateral shall be deemed to include cash deposited with a trustee or other agent with respect to third party indebtedness) shall be excluded;

(b) acquisitions or investments that have been made by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries, including through mergers or consolidations and including any related financing transactions, during the four-quarter period or subsequent to such period and on or prior to the date such calculation is being made, and the change in Consolidated EBITDA resulting therefrom, will be given pro forma effect as if they had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter period, and Consolidated EBITDA for such period shall include the Consolidated EBITDA of the acquired entities or applicable to such investments, and related transactions, and shall otherwise be calculated on a pro forma basis;

(c) (i) any Person that is a Subsidiary on the date such calculation is being made will be deemed to have been a Subsidiary at all times during the applicable four-quarter period, and (ii) any Person that is not a Subsidiary on the date such calculation is being made will be deemed not to have been a Subsidiary at any time during the applicable four-quarter reference period;

(d) the Consolidated EBITDA attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the date such calculation is being made, will be excluded;

(e) the Interest Expense attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the date such calculation is being made, will be excluded, but only to the extent that the obligations giving rise to such Interest Expense will not be obligations of the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries following the date such calculation is being made;

(f) interest on Indebtedness that may optionally be determined at an interest rate based upon a factor of a prime or similar rate, a eurocurrency interbank offered rate, or other rate, shall be deemed to have been based upon the rate actually chosen, or, if none, then based upon such optional rate as the Issuers may designate; and

(g) except with respect to tje 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, for any period that includes any period of time occurring prior to October 30, 2013, the Penn Transactions shall be given pro forma effect as if the Penn Transactions had occurred at the beginning of such period.

“Property EBITDA” means, for any period of time with respect to the Penn Master Lease Properties or any other group of related properties or any property (excluding any properties that are not Income Properties), the sum, with respect to the Penn Master Lease Properties or other group of related properties or property, of the net income (or net loss) derived from such

property for such period (excluding, without duplication, gains (or losses) from dispositions of depreciable real estate investments, property valuation losses and impairment charges);

(1) plus, without duplication and solely to the extent already deducted (and not added back) in arriving at such net income (or net loss), the sum of the following amounts for such period:

(a) interest expense (whether paid or accrued and whether or not capitalized);

(b) income tax expense;

(d) amortization expense;

(e) extraordinary, non-recurring and unusual items, charges or expenses (including, without limitation, property valuation losses, impairment charges, fees, costs and expenses relating to the Penn Transactions, prepayment penalties and costs, fees or expenses incurred in connection with any capital markets offering, debt financing, or amendment thereto, redemption or exchange of indebtedness, lease termination, business combination, acquisition, disposition, recapitalization or similar transaction (regardless of whether such transaction is completed));

(f) expenses and losses associated with hedging agreements;

(g) expenses and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;

(i) the amount of integration costs deducted (and not added back) in such period in computing the net income (or net loss);

(k) to the extent not included in net income or, if otherwise excluded from Property EBITDA due to the operation of clause (2)(a) below, the amount of insurance proceeds received during such period, or after such period and on or prior to the date the calculation is made with respect to such period, attributable to such property;

(2) minus, without duplication and solely to the extent included in arriving at such net income (or net loss), the sum of the following amounts for such period:

(a) extraordinary, non-recurring and unusual gains (other than insurance proceeds);

(b) gains attributable to hedging agreements;

(d) other non-cash gains increasing net income (or decreasing net loss) other than accruals in the ordinary course;

provided that to the extent any amounts referred to in this definition or deducted in calculating net income (or net loss) (including any costs or expenses included in calculating net income (or net loss)) are required to be paid by the Penn Tenant under the Penn Master Lease or any other Person that is a lessee or operator of any such property, such amounts will not be subtracted, and will be added back to Property EBITDA for the applicable property or group of properties.

Property EBITDA will be adjusted, without duplication, to give pro forma effect: (x) in the case of any assets having been placed-in-service or removed from service since the beginning of the period and on or prior to the date of determination, to include or exclude, as the case may be, any Property EBITDA earned or eliminated as a result of the placement of such assets in service or removal of such assets from service as if the placement of such assets in service or removal of such assets from service occurred at the beginning of the period; and (y) in the case of any acquisition or disposition of any asset or group of assets since the beginning of the period and on or prior to the date of determination, including, without limitation, by merger, or stock or asset purchase or sale, to include or exclude, as the case may be, any Property EBITDA earned or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or disposition of those assets as if the acquisition or disposition occurred at the beginning of the period. For purposes of calculating Property EBITDA, all amounts shall be as determined reasonably by an Issuer, and in accordance with GAAP except to the extent that GAAP is not applicable.

“Qualified Successor Tenant” means a Person that: (a) in the reasonable judgment of an Issuer, has sufficient experience (directly or through one or more of its Subsidiaries) operating or managing casinos or is owned, controlled or managed by a Person with such experience, to operate properties subject to a Permitted Replacement Lease and (b) is licensed or certified by each gaming authority with jurisdiction over any gaming facility subject to the applicable Permitted Replacement Lease as of the initial date of the effectiveness of the applicable Permitted Replacement Lease.

“Rating Agency” means (a) Fitch, Moody’s or S&P in the case of the 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes and Moody’s or S&P’s in the case of all of the other notes or (b) if any of Fitch, Moody’s or S&P in the case of the 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes and Moody’s or S&P’s in the case of all of the other notes shall not make a rating on the notes publicly available, a nationally recognized statistical rating agency or agencies, as the case may be, selected by the Issuers (as certified by a resolution of the Issuers’ Board of Directors) which shall be substituted for Fitch, Moody’s or S&P, as the case may be.

“Rating Category” means (a) with respect to Fitch or S&P, any of the following categories: BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D (or equivalent successor categories); (b) with respect to Moody’s, any of the following categories: Ba, B, Caa, Ca, C and D (or equivalent successor categories); and (c) the equivalent of any such category of Fitch, S&P or Moody’s used by another Rating Agency selected by the Issuers. In determining whether the rating of the notes has decreased by one or more gradations, gradations within Rating Categories ((i) + and - for S&P and Fitch; (ii) 1, 2 and 3 for Moody’s; and (iii) the equivalent gradations for another Rating Agency selected by the Issuers) shall be taken into account (e.g., with respect to S&P, a decline in a rating from BB+ to BB, or from BB- to B+, will constitute a decrease of one gradation).

“Rating Date” means the date which is 90 days prior to the earlier of (a) a Change of Control or (b) public notice of the occurrence of a Change of Control or of the intention by the Issuers to effect a Change of Control.

“Rating Decline” with respect to a particular series of notes shall be deemed to occur if, within 90 days after public notice of the occurrence of a Change of Control (which period shall be extended in respect of a Rating Agency so long as the rating of the notes is under publicly announced consideration for possible downgrade by any such Rating Agency with respect to a Rating Category), the rating of such series of notes by at least two of the three Rating Agencies in the case of the 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes and each of the Rating Agencies in the case of all other notes shall be decreased by one or more gradations to or within a Rating Category (including gradations within Rating Categories as well as between Rating Categories) as compared to the rating of the notes on the Rating Date.

“Redevelopment Property” means any real property owned by an Issuer or its Subsidiaries that operates or is intended to operate as an Income Property (a)(i) that has been acquired by an Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries with a view toward renovating or rehabilitating such real property at an aggregate anticipated cost of at least 10% of the acquisition cost thereof and such renovation or rehabilitation is expected to disrupt the occupancy of at least 30% of the square footage of such property or (x) that an Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries intends to renovate or rehabilitate at an aggregate anticipated cost in excess of (y) 10% of the Capitalized Value of such real property immediately prior to such renovation or rehabilitation and such renovation or rehabilitation is expected to temporarily reduce the Property EBITDA attributable to such property by at least 30% as compared to the immediately preceding comparable prior period and or (ii) with respect to which an Issuer or a Subsidiary thereof has entered into a binding construction contract or construction has commenced, (b) that does not qualify as a “Development Property” and (c) that an Issuer so desires to classify as a “Redevelopment Property” for purposes of the notes.

“Revolving Credit Agreement” means the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2022 and as amended on September 2, 2022, by and among the Operating Partnership, as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other agents and lenders party thereto from time to time, including any related notes, guarantees, instruments and agreements executed in connection therewith, and in each case as amended through November 22, 2023 and as amended, modified, renewed, refunded, restructured, replaced or refinanced from time to time including increases in principal amount (whether the same are provided by the original agents and lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility or other agents or other lenders), that governs the Operating Partnership’s Revolving Credit Facility.

“Revolving Credit Facility” means the $1.750 billion revolving credit facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement

“Secured Debt” means, as of any date of determination, the portion of Total Debt as of such date that is secured by a Lien on property or assets of the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries.

“Significant Acquisition” means an acquisition in which the aggregate consideration (whether in the form of cash, securities, goodwill, or otherwise) with respect to such acquisition is not less than five percent (5%) of Total Asset Value immediately prior to such acquisition.

“Significant Subsidiary” means any Subsidiary of an Issuer having (together with its Subsidiaries) assets that constitute five percent (5%) or more of Total Asset Value as of the end any of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Issuers for which Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared prior to the date of determination.

“Statistical Release” means the statistical release designated “H.15” or any successor publication which is published weekly by the Federal Reserve System (or companion online data resource published by the Federal Reserve System) and which establishes yields on actively traded United States government securities adjusted to constant maturities, or, if such statistical release is not published at the time of any determination under the indenture, then such other reasonably comparable index designated by us.

“Subsidiary” means, as to any Person, (i) any corporation more than 50% of whose stock of any class or classes having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the directors of such corporation (irrespective of whether or not at the time stock of any class or classes of such corporation shall have or might have voting power by reason of the happening of any contingency) is at the time owned by such Person and/or one or more Subsidiaries of such Person and (ii) any partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture or other entity in which such Person and/or one or more Subsidiaries of such Person has more than a 50% equity interest at the time. Unless otherwise qualified, all references to a “Subsidiary” or to “Subsidiaries” shall refer to a Subsidiary or Subsidiaries of an Issuer, and in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii) which is required to be consolidated with such Person in accordance with GAAP.

“Term Loan Credit Agreement” refers to the Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2022, by and among the Operating Partnership, as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto from time to time, including any related notes, guarantees, instruments and agreements executed in connection therewith, and in each case as amended through November 22, 2023 and as amended, modified, renewed, refunded, restructured, replaced or refinanced from time to time including increases in principal amount (whether the same are provided by the original agents and lenders under the Term Loan Credit Facility or other agents or other lenders) that governs the Operating Partnership’s Term Loan Credit Facility.

“Term Loan Credit Facility” refers to the $600.0 million delayed draw credit facility under the Term Loan Credit Agreement.

“Total Asset Value” means, as of any date, the sum of the following without duplication: (a) the sum of the Asset Values for all assets constituting Income Properties, Development Properties, Redevelopment Properties or undeveloped land owned by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries at such date, plus (b) an amount (but not less than zero) equal to all unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries (including the proceeds of the Indebtedness to be incurred), plus (c) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions as of such date, plus (d) the book value (determined in accordance with GAAP) (but determined without giving effect to any depreciation or amortization) of all other investments held by the Issuers and their Subsidiaries at such date (exclusive of accounts receivable and non-real estate intangible assets in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, accounts receivable and goodwill and other intangible assets in the case of the 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes and goodwill and other intangible assets in the case of all other notes). Total Asset Value shall be adjusted in the case of assets owned by Subsidiaries of the Issuers which are not wholly owned Subsidiaries of the Issuers to reflect the Issuers’ Ownership Share therein.

“Total Debt” means, as of any date of determination, the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Indebtedness of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries as of such date; provided that (a) Total Debt shall not include Indebtedness in respect of letters of credit, except to the extent of unreimbursed amounts thereunder, and (b) the amount of Total Debt, in the case of Indebtedness of a Subsidiary of the Issuers that is not a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Issuers, shall be reduced to reflect the Issuers’ proportionate interest therein.

“Total Unencumbered Asset Value” means, as of any date of determination, the Total Asset Value for all assets owned by the Issuers or one of their Subsidiaries at such date that are not subject to any Lien which secures Indebtedness of the Issuers and their Subsidiaries; provided, however, that in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes, 2031 Notes, 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes all investments by the Issuers and their Subsidiaries in unconsolidated joint ventures, unconsolidated limited partnerships, unconsolidated limited liability companies and other unconsolidated entities shall be excluded from Total Unencumbered Asset Value to the extent such investments would have otherwise been included.

“Unconsolidated Affiliate” means, with respect to any Person, any other Person in whom such Person holds an Investment, which Investment is accounted for in the financial statements of such Person on an equity basis of accounting and whose financial results would not be consolidated under GAAP with the financial results of such Person on the Consolidated Financial Statements of such Person.

“Unsecured Debt” means, as of any date of determination, that portion of Total Debt as of that date that is not Secured Debt.

“Voting Stock” of any Person as of any date means the Capital Stock of such Person that is at the time entitled to vote in the election of the Board of Directors of such Person.

Events of Default

The following are “events of default” under the indenture with respect to debt securities of a particular series issued under the indenture, including the notes:

(1) default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on the debt securities of a particular series issued under the indenture, including the notes;

(2) default in payment when due of the principal of or premium, if any, on the debt securities of a particular series issued under the indenture, including the notes;

(3) failure by the Issuers or any of their Subsidiaries for 60 days after receipt of notice from the trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the notes then outstanding to comply with any of the covenants or agreements in the indenture (other than a covenant or agreement included in the indenture for the benefit of one or more series of debt securities other than the notes) or the notes;

(4) certain specified events under bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar laws with respect to the Issuers or any of their Significant Subsidiaries;

(5) a default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which there may be issued or by which there may be secured or evidenced any of our recourse Indebtedness (or the payment of which we guarantee), whether such Indebtedness or guarantee now exists or is created after the date of the indenture, if that default: (i) is caused by a failure to pay principal of such Indebtedness at final maturity (a “payment default”); or (ii) results in the acceleration of such Indebtedness prior to its express maturity (which, in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, such Indebtedness has not been Discharged or, in the case of any of the notes, acceleration has not been rescinded, annulled or cured within 20 business days after receipt by us of notice from the trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the notes then outstanding specifying such default), and, in each case, the due and payable principal amount of any such Indebtedness, together with the due and payable principal amount of any other such Indebtedness under which there has been a payment default or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates $100.0 million or more; and

(6) except with respect to the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes, other than in connection with any transaction not prohibited by “-Certain Covenants-Penn Master Lease,” the Penn Master Lease shall have terminated or the Penn Master Lease Guaranty shall have terminated (other than in accordance with the terms of the Penn Master Lease); provided that such termination shall not constitute an event of default if within 90 days after such termination the Operating Partnership has entered into one or more Permitted Replacement Leases (or in the case of the Penn Master Lease Guaranty, a replacement guaranty is entered into in accordance with the Penn Master Lease).

In the case of an event of default arising under clause (4) of the immediately preceding paragraph with respect to the Issuers, all notes then outstanding will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. If any other event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of then outstanding notes (or then outstanding debt securities of a particular series in case of an event of default specific to such series) may declare all the debt securities outstanding under the indenture (or all of the notes of such series, as applicable) to be due and payable immediately.

Holders of the notes may not enforce the indenture or the notes except as provided in the indenture. Subject to certain limitations, holders of a majority in principal amount of then outstanding notes may direct the trustee, in writing, in its exercise of any trust or power. The trustee may withhold from holders of the notes notice of any continuing default or event of default if it determines that withholding notice is in their interest, except a default or event of default relating to the payment of principal or interest.

The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding by written notice to the trustee may on behalf of the holders of all of the notes waive any existing default or event of default with respect to the notes and its consequences under the indenture (or in the case of an event of default specific to a series of debt securities outstanding under the indenture, including the notes, holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the debt securities of such series then outstanding by written notice to the trustee may on behalf of the holders of all of such series waive any existing default or event of default with respect to the debt securities of such series and its consequences under the indenture), in each case, except a continuing default or event of default in the payment of interest on, or the principal of, such debt securities, including the notes; provided that the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of such debt securities (or of the debt securities of

such series, respectively) then outstanding may rescind an acceleration of the debt securities (or the debt securities of such series) and waive the payment default that resulted from such acceleration.

The Issuers are required to deliver to the trustee annually a statement regarding compliance with the indenture. Upon becoming aware of any default or event of default, the Issuers are required to deliver to the trustee, a statement specifying such default or event of default.

Notwithstanding clause (3) of the first paragraph above or any other provision of the indenture, except as provided in the final sentence of this paragraph, the sole remedy for any failure to comply by the Issuers with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” shall be the payment of liquidated damages as described in the following sentence, such failure to comply shall not constitute an event of default, and holders of the notes shall not have any right under the indenture or the notes to accelerate the maturity of the notes as a result of any such failure to comply. If a failure to comply by the Issuers with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” continues for 60 days after the Issuers receives notice of such failure to comply in accordance with clause (3) of the first paragraph above (such notice, the “Reports Default Notice”), and is continuing on the 60th day following the Issuers’ receipt of the Reports Default Notice, the Issuers will pay liquidated damages to all holders of notes at a rate per annum equal to 0.25% of the principal amount of the notes from the 60th day following the Issuers’ receipt of the Reports Default Notice to but not including the earlier of (x) the 121st day following the Issuers’ receipt of the Reports Default Notice and (y) the date on which the failure to comply by the Issuers with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” shall have been cured or waived. On the earlier of the date specified in the immediately preceding clauses (x) and (y), such liquidated damages will cease to accrue. If the failure to comply by the Issuers with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” shall not have been cured or waived on or before the 121st day following the Issuers’ receipt of the Reports Default Notice, then the failure to comply by the Issuers with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” shall on such 121st day constitute an event of default. A failure to comply with the covenant described under the caption “—Certain Covenants-Reports” automatically shall cease to be continuing and shall be deemed cured at such time as the Issuers (or the Guarantor or other parent guarantor of the Issuers, as applicable) furnishes to the trustee the applicable information or report (it being understood that the availability of such information or report on the SEC’s EDGAR service (or any successor thereto) shall be deemed to satisfy the Issuers’ obligation to furnish such information or report to the trustee); provided, however, that the trustee shall have no obligation whatsoever to determine whether or not such information, documents or reports have been filed pursuant to the “EDGAR” system (or its successor).

Amendment, Supplement and Waiver

Except as provided in the next three succeeding paragraphs, the notes and the indenture may be amended or supplemented with the consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the notes of a series then outstanding (including consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, notes), and any existing default or compliance with the notes of a series or any provision of the indenture as it relates to the notes of a series may be waived with the consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the notes of such series then outstanding (including consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, notes).

Without the consent of each holder of notes affected, an amendment or waiver may not (with respect to any notes held by a non-consenting holder):

(1) reduce the principal amount of notes whose holders must consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver;

(2) reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity of any note or alter the provisions with respect to the redemption of the notes;

(3) reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest on any note;

(4) waive a default or event of default in the payment of principal of or interest or premium on the notes (except a rescission of acceleration of the notes by the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes and a waiver of the payment default that resulted from such acceleration);

(5) make any note payable in money other than that stated in the notes;

(6) make any change in the provisions of the indenture relating to waivers of past defaults or the rights of holders of notes to receive payments of principal of or interest or premium on the notes;

(7) waive a redemption payment with respect to any note; or

(8) make any change in the preceding amendment and waiver provisions.

Notwithstanding the preceding, without the consent of any holder of notes, the Issuers and the trustee may amend or supplement the indenture or the notes:

(1) to cure any ambiguity, defect, mistake or inconsistency;

(2) to provide for uncertificated notes in addition to or in place of certificated notes;

(3) to provide for the assumption of the Issuers’ obligations to holders of notes in the case of a merger or consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the Issuers’ assets;

(4) to comply with the rules of any applicable securities depository;

(5) to comply with applicable Gaming Laws, to the extent that such amendment or supplement is not materially adverse to the holders of notes;

(6) to provide for the issuance of additional notes or additional debt securities of any series in accordance with the limitations set forth in the indenture;

(7) to make any change that would provide any additional rights or benefits to the holders of notes (including to provide for any guarantees of the notes or any collateral securing the notes or any guarantees of the notes) or that does not materially adversely affect the legal rights under the indenture of any such holder;

(8) to comply with requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain the qualification of the indenture under the TIA; or

(9) to conform the text of the indenture or the notes to any provision of the Description of Notes contained in the 2013 Offering Memorandum or this prospectus supplement as set forth in an officer’s certificate.

Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance

The Issuers may, at their option and at any time, elect to have all of their obligations discharged with respect to any series of the outstanding notes (“Legal Defeasance”) except for:

(1) the rights of holders of outstanding notes to receive payments in respect of the principal of or interest or premium on such notes when such payments are due from the trust referred to below;

(2) the Issuers’ obligations with respect to the notes concerning issuing temporary notes, the replacement of mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen notes and the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and money for security payments held in trust;

(3) the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of the trustee, and the Issuers’ obligations in connection therewith; and

(4) the Legal Defeasance provisions of the indenture.

In addition, the Issuers may, at their option and at any time, elect to have the obligations of the Issuers released with respect to certain covenants that are described in the indenture (“Covenant Defeasance”) and thereafter any omission to comply with those covenants will not constitute a default or event of default with respect to the notes. In the event Covenant Defeasance occurs, certain events (not including the events described in clauses (1), (2), or (4) under the caption “Events of Default” above pertaining to the Issuers) described under the caption “Events of Default” above will no longer constitute an event of default with respect to the notes. The Issuers may exercise Legal Defeasance regardless of whether they previously have exercised Covenant Defeasance.

In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance:

(1) the Issuers must irrevocably deposit with the trustee, in trust, for the benefit of the holders of the series of notes to be defeased, cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable government securities, or a combination of cash in U.S. dollars and non-callable government securities, in amounts as will be sufficient, in the opinion or based on the report of a nationally recognized firm of independent public accountants, investment bank or appraisal firm, to pay the principal of, premium, if any, on and accrued and unpaid interest on the outstanding notes to be defeased on the stated maturity or on a redemption date, as the case may be, and the Issuers must specify whether the notes are being defeased to maturity or to a particular redemption date; provided that, with respect to any redemption pursuant to “—Redemption-Optional Redemption,” the amount deposited shall be sufficient for purposes of the indenture to the extent that an amount is so deposited with the trustee equal to the redemption amount computed using the Treasury Rate (or the Adjusted Treasury Rate in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) as of the third business date preceding the date of such deposit with the trustee (or the Deposit Date in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes);

(2) in the case of Legal Defeasance, the Issuers must have delivered to the trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to the trustee confirming that (a) the Issuers have received from, or there has been published by, the Internal Revenue Service a ruling or (b) since the date of the indenture, there has been a change in the applicable United States federal income tax law, in either case to the effect that the holders of the outstanding notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of such Legal Defeasance and will be subject to United States federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred;

(3) in the case of Covenant Defeasance, the Issuers must have delivered to the trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to the trustee confirming that the holders of the outstanding notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred;

(4) no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing on the date of such deposit (other than a default or event of default resulting from transactions occurring contemporaneously with the borrowing of funds, or the borrowing of funds, to be applied to such deposit or other Indebtedness which is being Discharged and, in each case, the granting of Liens in connection therewith);

(5) such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under any material agreement or instrument (other than the indenture or any agreement or instrument governing any other Indebtedness which is being Discharged) to which the Issuers are a party or by which the Issuers are bound;

(6) the Issuers must deliver to the trustee an officer’s certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Issuers with the intent of preferring the holders of notes over the other creditors of the Issuers or with the intent of defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors of the Issuers or others; and

(7) the Issuers must deliver to the trustee an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent relating to the Legal Defeasance or the Covenant Defeasance have been complied with.

The Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will be effective on the day on which all the applicable conditions above have been satisfied. Upon compliance with the foregoing, the trustee shall execute proper instrument(s) acknowledging such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance.

Satisfaction and Discharge

The indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further effect as to all notes issued thereunder, when:

(1) either:

(a) all notes that have been authenticated, except lost, stolen or destroyed notes that have been replaced or paid and notes for whose payment money has been deposited in trust and, if provided for in the indenture, thereafter repaid to the Issuers, have been delivered to the trustee for cancellation; or

(b) all notes that have not been delivered to the trustee for cancellation have become due and payable by reason of the mailing of a notice of redemption or otherwise or will become due and payable within one year and the Issuers have irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the trustee as trust funds in trust solely for the benefit of the holders, cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable government securities, or a combination of cash in U.S. dollars and non-callable government securities, in amounts as will be sufficient, without consideration of any reinvestment of interest, to pay and discharge the entire indebtedness on the notes not delivered to the trustee for cancellation for principal, premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of maturity or redemption; provided that, in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes, 2031 Notes, 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes, in the event that any portion of the trust funds so deposited consist of non-callable government securities, the sufficiency of such trust funds shall be determined based upon the opinion or the report of a nationally recognized firm of independent public accountants, investment bank or appraisal firm; provided further that, with respect to any redemption pursuant to “-Redemption-Optional Redemption,” the amount deposited shall be sufficient for purposes of the indenture to the extent that an amount is so deposited with the trustee equal to the redemption amount computed using the Treasury Rate (or the Adjusted Treasury Rate in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) as of the third business date preceding the date of such deposit with the trustee (or the date of such deposit with the trustee, including any such deposit in connection with a Legal or Covenant Defeasance described above under “—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance” in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the 2031 Notes) (the date of any such deposit, a “Deposit Date”);

(2) the Issuers have paid or caused to be paid all other sums then payable by it under the indenture; and

(3) the Issuers have delivered irrevocable written instructions to the trustee under the indenture to apply the deposited money toward the payment of the notes at maturity or the redemption date, as the case may be.

In addition, the Issuers must deliver an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel to the trustee stating that all conditions precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been satisfied.

Upon compliance with the foregoing, the trustee shall execute proper instrument(s) acknowledging the satisfaction and discharge of all of the Issuers’ obligations under the notes and the indenture.

No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and Stockholders

No director, officer, employee, incorporator or direct or indirect partner, member or stockholder, past, present or future, of the Issuers, the Guarantor or any successor entity, as such, will have any liability for any obligations of the Issuers or the Guarantor under the notes or the indenture or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation. Each holder of notes by accepting a note waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the notes. The waiver may not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal securities laws.

Forms and Denomination

The notes are issued as permanent global securities in the name of a nominee of DTC. The notes are issued in fully registered form without coupons and are available for purchase only in denominations of $2,000 and in integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.

Governing Law

The indenture and the notes will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

Concerning the Trustee

If the trustee becomes a creditor of the Issuers or the Guarantor, the indenture limits its right to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to realize on certain property received in respect of any such claim as security or otherwise. The trustee will be permitted to engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any conflicting interest it must eliminate such conflict within 90 days, apply to the SEC for permission to continue or resign.

The holders of a majority in principal amount of then outstanding applicable series of notes will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy available to the trustee with respect to such series of notes, subject to certain exceptions. The indenture provides that in case an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a prudent person in the conduct of such person’s own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the indenture at the request of any holder of notes, unless such holder has offered to the trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense.

In the case the of the 2033, 2032 Notes, 2031 Notes, 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes, the trustee shall be entitled to make a deduction or withholding from any payment which it makes under the indenture for or on account of any present or future taxes, duties or charges if and to the extent so required by any applicable law and any current or future regulations or agreements thereunder or official interpretations thereof or any law implementing an intergovernmental approach thereto or by virtue of the relevant holder failing to satisfy any certification or other requirements in respect of the notes, in which event the trustee shall make such payment after such withholding or deduction has been made and shall account to the relevant authorities for the amount so withheld or deducted and shall have no obligation to gross up any payment hereunder or pay any additional amount as a result of such withholding tax. In connection with any proposed exchange of a certificated note for a global note interest, the Issuers or DTC shall be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to provide or cause to be provided to the trustee all information reasonably requested by the trustee that is necessary to allow the trustee to comply with any applicable tax reporting obligations, including, in the case of the 2033 Notes, the 2032 Notes, 2031 Notes, 2030 Notes and 2024 Notes, without limitation, any cost basis reporting obligations under Section 6045 of the Code. The trustee shall be entitled to rely on the information provided to it and shall have no responsibility to verify or ensure the accuracy of such information.

Certain Provisions of Pennsylvania Law and GLPI’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and Other Governance Documents

Size of Board and Vacancies; Removal of Directors

Pursuant to GLPI’s Articles of Incorporation, each member of GLPI’s board of directors is elected until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor is elected or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. At any meeting of shareholders for the uncontested election of directors at which a quorum is present, the election will be determined by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote in the election.

The Bylaws provide that the number of directors on GLPI’s board of directors will be fixed exclusively by the board of directors. Subject to the rights of holders of any stock having preference over the common stock to elect additional directors, newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the number of directors and any vacancies in the board of directors resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or other cause will be filled by the majority vote of the remaining directors in office, even if less than a quorum is present.

Subject to the rights of any stock having preference over the common stock to elect directors, the Bylaws provide that a director may be removed only for cause (as defined in the Bylaws) by the affirmative vote of: (i) a majority of the entire GLPI board of directors (not including the director whose removal is being considered); or (ii) 75% of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. In addition, under Section 1726(c) of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law, or the PBCL, a court may remove a director upon application in a derivative suit in cases of fraudulent or dishonest acts, gross abuse of authority or discretion, or for any other proper cause. Section 1726(a)(4) of the PBCL also provides that the board of directors may be removed at any time with or without cause by the unanimous vote or written consents of the shareholders entitled to vote thereon.

Pennsylvania State Takeover Statutes

Section 2538 of Subchapter 25D of the PBCL requires certain transactions with an “interested shareholder” to be approved by a majority of disinterested shareholders. “Interested shareholder” is defined broadly to include any shareholder who is a party to the transaction or who is treated differently than other shareholders and affiliates of the corporation and any person, or group of persons, that is acting jointly or in concert with the interested shareholder, and affiliates of the interested shareholder

Subchapter 25E of the PBCL requires a person or group of persons acting in concert which acquires 20% or more of the voting shares of the corporation to offer to purchase the shares of any other shareholder at “fair value.” “Fair value” means the value not less than the highest price paid by the controlling person or group during the 90-day period prior to the control transaction, plus a control premium. Among other exceptions, shares acquired directly from the corporation in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, are not counted towards the determination of whether the 20% share ownership threshold has been met for purposes of Subchapter 25E.

Subchapter 25F of the PBCL generally establishes a 5-year moratorium on a “business combination” with an “interested shareholder.” “Interested shareholder” is defined generally to be any beneficial owner of 20% or more of the corporation’s voting stock. “Business combination” is defined broadly to include mergers, consolidations, asset sales and certain self-dealing transactions. Certain restrictions apply to a business combination following the 5-year period. Among other exceptions, Subchapter 25F will be rendered inapplicable if the board of directors approves the proposed business combination, or approves the interested shareholder’s acquisition of 20% of the voting shares, in either case prior to the date on which the shareholder first becomes an interested shareholder.

Subchapter 25G of the PBCL provides that “control shares” lose voting rights unless such rights are restored by the affirmative vote of a majority of (i) the disinterested shares (generally, shares held by persons other than the acquiror, executive officers of the corporation, directors of the corporation who are also officers of the corporation (including executive officers), and certain employee stock plans) and (ii) the outstanding voting shares of the corporation. “Control shares” are defined as shares which, upon acquisition, will result in a person or group acquiring for the first time voting control over (a) 20%, (b) 33 1/3% or (c) 50% or more of the outstanding shares, together with shares acquired within 180 days of attaining the applicable threshold and shares purchased with the intention of attaining such threshold. A corporation may redeem control shares if the acquiring person does not request restoration of voting rights as permitted by Subchapter 25G or the voting rights of such control shares are not restored or voting rights lapse pursuant to Subchapter 25G. Among other exceptions, Subchapter 25G does not apply to a merger, consolidation or a share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction agreement.

Subchapter 25H of the PBCL provides that if any person or group publicly discloses that the person or group may acquire control of the corporation, or a person or group acquires, or publicly discloses an offer or intent to acquire, 20% or more of the voting power of the corporation and, in either case, sells shares in the following 18 months, then the profits from such sale must be disgorged to the corporation if the securities that were sold were acquired during the 18-month period or within the preceding 24 months.

If shareholders approve a control share acquisition under Subchapter 25G, the corporation is also subject to Subchapters 25I and 25J of the PBCL. Subchapter 25I provides for a minimum severance payment to certain employees terminated within 90 days before the approval if such termination was pursuant to an agreement with the acquiring person whose control shares were accorded voting rights in connection with such control-share approval or two years after the approval. Subchapter 25J prohibits the abrogation of certain labor contracts as a result of a business combination prior to their stated date of expiration.

Amendments to GLPI’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and Approval of Extraordinary Actions

Pennsylvania law and the Articles of Incorporation generally provide that GLPI can amend its Articles of Incorporation, merge, consolidate, sell all or substantially all of our assets, engage in a statutory share exchange or dissolve if the action has first been approved by the board of directors and then by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all shareholders entitled to vote on the matter. The Articles of Incorporation also provide that the amendment or repeal of any Articles of Incorporation provision concerning the indemnification or limitation of liability of GLPI’s directors will require the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the voting power of all of its outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. Pennsylvania law and the Articles of Incorporation permit GLPI’s shareholders to propose amendments to the Articles of Incorporation by petition of shareholders entitled to cast at least 10% of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast thereon, setting forth the proposed amendment, which petition shall be directed to the board of directors and filed with the secretary of the corporation. Pennsylvania law provides that GLPI’s shareholders are generally not entitled by statute to call special meetings of shareholders.

GLPI’s board of directors is authorized to adopt, amend or repeal any provision of the bylaws without shareholder approval. Except as otherwise required by law, any provision of the Bylaws may only be adopted, amended or repealed by the shareholders (i) upon receiving at least 75% of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote thereon or (ii) in the event that the amendment has been proposed by a majority of the board of directors, upon receiving a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote thereon.

Shareholder Meetings

Under the PBCL, shareholders generally will be not entitled to call special meetings of shareholders. Only the chairman of the board of directors or a majority of the directors then in office may call such meetings pursuant to the Bylaws.

Shareholder Action by Written Consent

Under the PBCL, unless otherwise permitted in the articles of incorporation, any action required to be taken or which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders may be taken without a meeting if, and only if, prior to the taking of such action, all shareholders entitled to vote thereon consent in writing to such action being taken.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Shareholder Nominations and Proposals and Proxy Access

The Bylaws contain advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and recommendations of candidates for election as directors other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors. In particular, shareholders must notify the corporate secretary in writing prior to the meeting at which the matters are to be acted upon or directors are to be elected. The notice must contain the information specified in the Bylaws. To be timely, the notice must be received at GLPI’s principal executive office not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. In order to be eligible to present a shareholder proposal or recommend a candidate for nomination for election as a director at a shareholders meeting, a shareholder must have owned beneficially at least 1% of the outstanding GLPI common stock for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. In addition, shareholders or shareholder groups who desire to nominate directly and include candidates for election to the board of directors must own 3% or more of the outstanding GLPI common stock for a continuous period of not less than three years, may nominate only up to a maximum of the greater of (x) two) and (y) twenty percent (20%) of GLPI’s board members and must satisfy certain procedural, eligibility and disclosure requirements set forth in the Bylaws, including, but not limited to, a requirement that a notice of proxy access nomination must be received at GLPI’s principal executive office not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders.

Effect of Certain Provisions of Pennsylvania Law and of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

The restrictions on ownership and transfer of GLPI stock will prohibit any person from acquiring more than 7% of its outstanding common stock (without prior approval of GLPI’s board of directors). The power of GLPI’s board of directors to issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and preferred stock without shareholder approval also could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or other transaction. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock could make it more difficult, or discourage an attempt, to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

These provisions, along with other provisions of the PBCL and the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws discussed above, including provisions relating to the removal of directors and the filling of vacancies, the advance notice and special meeting provisions, alone or in combination, are designed to protect GLPI’s shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with GLPI’s board of directors and by providing GLPI’s board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal.

Shareholders Rights Plan

While the PBCL authorizes a corporation to adopt a shareholder rights plan, GLPI does not have a shareholder rights plan currently in effect.

Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers

The PBCL permits a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation), by reason of the fact that he is or was a representative of the corporation, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In an action by or in the right of the corporation, indemnification will not be made in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which the person has been adjudged to be liable to the corporation.

Unless ordered by a court, the determination of whether indemnification is proper in a specific case will be determined by (1) the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action or proceeding; (2) if such a quorum is not obtainable or if obtainable and a majority vote of a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (3) by the shareholders.

To the extent that a representative of a business corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of a third-party action, derivative action, or corporate action, he or she must be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection therewith.

Pennsylvania law permits a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance for a director or officer against any liability asserted against him or her, and incurred in his or her capacity as a director or officer or arising out of his or her position, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him or her against such liability under Pennsylvania law.

The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that a director shall, to the maximum extent permitted by Pennsylvania law, have no personal liability or monetary damages for any action taken, or any failure to take any action as a director. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws also provide for indemnification for current and former directors, officers, employees, or agents serving at the request of the corporation to the fullest extent permitted by Pennsylvania law. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws also permit the advancement of expenses.

Document

Exhibit 22.1

List of Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities

The following subsidiaries of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) were, as of December 31, 2023, issuers of the (i) $400 million 3.35% senior unsecured notes due September 2024, (ii) $850 million 5.25% senior unsecured notes due June 2025, (iii) $975 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due April 2026, (iv) $500 million 5.75% senior unsecured notes due June 2028, (v) $750 million 5.30% senior unsecured notes due January 2029, (vi) $700 million 4.00% senior unsecured notes due January 2030, (vii) $700 million 4.000% senior unsecured notes due January 2031, (viii) $800 million 3.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2032, (ix) $400 million 6.75% senior unsecured notes due November 2033 each guaranteed by the Company:


Entity			Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
GLP Capital, L.P.			Pennsylvania
GLP Financing II, Inc.			Delaware

Document

Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated February 27, 2024, relating to the financial statements of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. and the effectiveness of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Registration Statement No. 333-266814 on Form S-3

Registration Statement No. 333-192017 on Form S-8

Registration Statement No. 333-249523 on Form S-8

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York

February 27, 2024

Document

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Peter M. Carlino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:	February 27, 2024	/s/ Peter M. Carlino
		Name: Peter M. Carlino
		Chief Executive Officer

Document

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Desiree A. Burke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.;

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:	February 27, 2024	/s/ Desiree A. Burke
		Name: Desiree A. Burke
		Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Document

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Carlino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


			/s/ Peter M. Carlino
			Peter M. Carlino
			Chief Executive Officer
Date:			February 27, 2024

Document

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Desiree A. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


			/s/ Desiree A. Burke
			Desiree A. Burke
			Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date:			February 27, 2024

Document

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

Policy Regarding the Mandatory Recovery of Compensation

Effective October 26, 2023

I. Applicability. This Policy Regarding the Mandatory Recovery of Compensation (the “Policy”) applies to any Incentive Compensation paid to Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc.’s (the “Company”) Executive Officers. The Policy is intended to comply with and be interpreted in accordance with the requirements of Listing Rule 5608 (“Listing Rule 5608”) of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and Rule 10D-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The provisions of Listing Rule 5608 shall prevail in the event of any conflict between the text of this Policy and such listing rule. Certain capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein are defined in Section IV hereof.

II. Recovery.

a. Triggering Event.

Except as provided herein and subject to Section II(b) below, in the event that the Company is required to prepare a Financial Restatement, the Company shall recover any Recoverable Amount (as defined in Section II(d) below) of any Incentive Compensation received by a current or former Executive Officer during the Look-Back Period. The Recoverable Amount shall be repaid to the Company within a reasonably prompt time after the current or former Executive Officer is notified in writing of the Recoverable Amount as set forth in Section II(c) below, accompanied by a reasonably detailed computation thereof. For the sake of clarity, the recovery rule in this Section II(a) shall apply regardless of any misconduct, fault, or illegal activity of the Company, any Executive Officer, or Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) or any committee thereof.

b. Compensation Subject to Recovery.

i. Incentive Compensation subject to mandatory recovery under Section II(a) includes any Incentive Compensation received by an Executive Officer:

a. After beginning service as an Executive Officer;

b. Who served as an Executive Officer at any time during the performance period for that Incentive Compensation;

c. While the Company has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange or a national securities association; and

d. During the Look-Back Period.

ii. As used in this Section II(b), Incentive Compensation is deemed “received” in the fiscal period that the Financial Reporting Measure specified in the applicable Incentive Compensation award is attained, even if the payment or grant of the Incentive Compensation occurs after the end of that period. This Section II(b) will only apply to Incentive Compensation received in any fiscal period ending on or after October 2, 2023.

c. Recoupment.

i. The Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) shall determine, at its sole discretion, the method for recouping Incentive Compensation, which may include (A) requiring reimbursement of Incentive Compensation previously paid; (B) seeking recovery of any gain realized on the vesting, exercise, settlement, sale, transfer, or other disposition of any equity-based awards; (C) deducting the amount to be recouped from any compensation otherwise owed by the Company to the Executive Officer; and/or (D) taking any other remedial and recovery action permitted by law, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

d. Recoverable Amount.

i. The Recoverable Amount is equal to the amount of Incentive Compensation received in excess of the amount of Incentive Compensation that would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amounts in the Financial Restatement, without regard to taxes paid by the Company or the Executive Officer.

ii. In the event the Incentive Compensation is based on a measurement that is not subject to mathematical recalculation, the Recoverable Amount shall be based on a reasonable estimate of the effect of the Financial Restatement, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be set forth in writing. For example, in the case of Incentive Compensation based on stock price or total shareholder return, the Recoverable Amount shall be based on a reasonable estimate of the effect of the Financial Restatement on the stock price or total shareholder return.

e. Exceptions to Applicability.

The Company must recover the Recoverable Amount of Incentive Compensation as stated above in Section II(a) unless the Compensation Committee makes a determination that recovery would be impracticable, and at least one of the following applies:

i. The direct expense paid to a third party to assist in enforcing recovery would exceed the Recoverable Amount, and a reasonable attempt to recover the Recoverable Amount has already been made and documented;

ii. Recovery of the Recoverable Amount would violate home country law (provided such law was adopted prior to November 28, 2022 and that an opinion of counsel in such country is obtained stating that recoupment would result in such violation); or

iii. Recovery would likely cause an otherwise tax-qualified retirement plan, under which benefits are broadly available to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, to fail to meet the requirements of 26 U.S.C. 401(a)(13) or 26 U.S.C. 411(a) and regulations thereunder.

III. Miscellaneous.

a. The Board or Compensation Committee may require that any incentive plan, employment agreement, equity award agreement, or similar agreement entered into

on or after the date hereof shall, as a condition to the grant of any benefit thereunder, require an Executive Officer to agree to abide by the terms of this Policy, including the repayment of the Recoverable Amount of erroneously awarded Incentive Compensation.

b. The Company shall not indemnify any Executive Officer or other individual against the loss of any incorrectly awarded or otherwise recouped Incentive Compensation or any claims relating to the Company’s enforcement of its rights under the Policy.

c. The Company shall comply with applicable compensation recovery policy disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).

IV. Definitions.

a. Incentive Compensation. “Incentive Compensation” means any compensation that is granted, earned, or vests based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a Financial Reporting Measure, but does not include awards that are earned or vest based solely on the continued provision of services for a period of time.

b. Financial Reporting Measure. “Financial Reporting Measure” means any reporting measure that is determined and presented in accordance with the accounting principles used in preparing the Company’s financial statements, and any measures that are derived wholly or in part from such measures. Stock price and total shareholder return are considered to be Financial Reporting Measures for purposes of this Policy. A financial reporting measure need not be presented within the financial statements or included in a filing with the Commission.

c. Financial Restatement. A “Financial Restatement” means any accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that (i) is material to the previously issued financial statements (commonly referred to as a “Big R” restatement), or (ii) is not material to previously issued financial statements, but would result in a material misstatement if the error was left uncorrected in the current period or the error correction were recognized in the current period (commonly referred to as a “little r” restatement). For purposes of this Policy, the date of a Financial Restatement will be deemed to be the earlier of (i) the date the Board, a committee of the Board, or officers authorized to take such action if Board action is not required, concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, and (ii) the date a court, regulator, or other legally authorized body directs the Company to prepare an accounting restatement.

d. Executive Officer. “Executive Officer” shall mean the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, or principal accounting officer (or, if there is no such accounting officer, the Controller), any vice-president of the Company in charge of a principal business unit, division or function (such as sales, administration or finance), and any other officer or person who performs a significant policy-making function for the Company, whether such person is employed by the Company or a subsidiary thereof. For the sake of clarity, ”Executive Officer” includes at a minimum executive officers identified by the Board pursuant to 17 CFR 229.401(b).

e. Look-Back Period. The “Look-Back Period” means the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date of a Financial Restatement and any transition period as set forth in Listing Rule 5608.